I just witnessed a social experiment bring performed on a test subject, unbeknownst to them. Why are they trying to discover what is human? Why does the left try to analyze so hard what makes us tick? Is it just a ruse into creating a more willing agent on their chessboard?
To withhold any more suspense would be rude. But consider my rambling, how would you feel to be one of these camera men who each were told who or what object to film upon opening. I'm sure the reporter was being joked all day that if the first iPhone purchaser dropped his phone would make for good TV.
But what of the customer? Who has been a loyal servant to the left, he's their favorite player. A loyal consumer, and then he shatters his phone. And the reporter acts to pick up pieces, while the cameras cover every angle as he picks up the phone. The whole line of people watch. Probably over half of the faggots in line watching secretly happy. Fucking jealous of bullshit attention. Wanting to buy buy up a product they didn't even need to replace.
Was it a designed trigger? ;P
The left is up to no good.
If you are working in the news industry, you are manipulated to distract.
I imagine some people have to be coming to their senses. They don't even have to have been given direct orders, it's simply power of suggestion. These faggots working on TV trying to be funny and friendly and flirty. All acting famous like the celebrities (((the left))) wants you to eat up and strive to be...
Fucking fake. An actor.
A controlled player. Drones.
In this game.
Figure out your position. Stand with me or against me. It matters not because I will be designing a game, a test to better identify who are truly just acting.
Just a little treat, it will be a spontaneous timed game. Where there are repercussions on everyone's scores based on everyone's answer.
I don't know the appropriate time needed to identify controlled agents, but I am working on some figures. To keep enough steps in the chain of thought.
If I do it correctly, it could identify things you may not know about someone you're playing against in as little as 2 rounds.
Eualos ago
You'd think so, if they weren't such self-absorbed twats
Eualos ago
You'd think so, if they weren't such self absorbed twats
Drenki ago
Look, mate, if you're looking for stuff to get riled up about, you'll never stop finding it. Ask yourself, did they rile you up or did you let yourself get riled up?
fusir ago
Sometimes in the profession world when you discover that you are a pawn of a chess player you ask how can I be a better pawn.
It's to their career's interest to be an effective pawn. These people are all vain because they are in a media industry. They look to the guy at the top and ask how do I get there. And the people in charge know that's what their workers do so they place their most loyal pawns at the top.
patriot_biz ago
I disagree with that. I think Hillary Clinton is a good example of someone who makes all the right moves but in the end she's not awarded the prize because she's simply not likable. Being a good person is more important than climbing the ladder.
fusir ago
Makes all the right moves like disapearing for three weeks in the height of campaign season?
TreborPJ ago
Fuck the media as a whole. They have deceived many through their selective news reporting. Now the entertainment is so sexualized, violent, and uneducated social drama. where someone's personality is damn near half the entertainment. I can't stand what information and entertainment is forced to the common people who still rely on their tv.
1moar ago
You're preaching to the choir from the back of the room. Catch up.