I used to run with that theory as well because you assume people got trampled or fell and got hurt or whatever but I keep reading news reports that "He killed almost 60 and shot almost 500." So I use their numbers now.
That means at over 1200' away every other bullet hit someone...
So you acknowledge this isn't true yet you post this bullshit anyway?
So I use their numbers now.
Why in the world would you take something a presstitute said as valuable? It has no value, it is only meant for propaganda purposes. You certainly can't use it as a premise for an argument.
Honestly, I would delete this post. It does nothing to further discussion and only makes Voat look bad. Just my 2 cents.
Maybe you're unfamiliar with what a conspiracy is? Showing how all of their information doesn't make sense is part of what makes it a conspiracy... which is why I posted it in v/conspiracy and not v/news.
I guess I'm just saying that no one who is reputable in the slightest has said that five hundred people were shot. Only dumb presstitutes.
I'm more concerned with all the holes in the story as presented by our FBI because of their authority on the matter.
Like the other poster said, this is akin to when a dumb whore of a presstitute calls an AK a glock. I wouldn't then go and say "See! It is a conspiracy because he had an AK!" No, she is just being a dumb whore doing her job.
I guess a point we might both agree on is that no jew is going to stop and correct these presstitutes when they make mistakes that are beneficial to the agenda, such as falsely claiming that five hundred plus people were shot.
We're on the same page. I prefer to use THEIR words to show how stupid they are as opposed to correcting their misinformation for them. I need to see if I can find the article I read last night. It was kind of hilarious. It talked about all of the scopes he had piled up in his room then explained later that he didn't need any scopes to spray.
“All the guns he had were very expensive, from $5,000 to $10,000 each, which is a lot of money for a gun,” a law enforcement source told The Post. All of the rifles were “high end” and typically used by people in law enforcement professions, the source added.
But earlier in the article it states:
The high-powered weapons also included a .308-caliber AR-10 rifle and an AK-47-type rifle — as well as four Daniel Defense DDM4 rifles, three FN-15s and other rifles made by Sig Sauer, according to reports.
Yah, um... I own a Daniel Defense AR-15. It cost me about $1000 new a few months ago. But the article does state there were only 2 bump stocks (while other articles say 11 or 13).
The news used to always call rifles used in crimes ak-47's and pistols glocks. Inaccuracy is just the way of the media, it's about selling a point, not perfect accurate information distribution to the public.
And your example. "killed 58 people and injured more than 500" they say injured not shot. Even the killed 58 people someone might of had a heart attack and died caused by the shooting.
Even if 500 people were shot ~50% accuracy into a mass of flesh the size of a city block isn't that spectacular. Early audio analysis done by 4chan came up with the guy shooting about 1500shots. So figure 33% accuracy and likely it was much higher than that because people were likely hit more than once.
So I fail to see how this is anything other than a distraction from the real shady shit that is being covered up. Things like why did he rent a car when he owned one, what was his motive, and how did he earn a living.
The only thing I disagree with in your response is that there was a mass of flesh. The venue was about 1/3 full at that time. The numbers given were TOTAL for the entire festival.
view the rest of the comments →
Thegreatestname ago
500 people injured doesn't mean 500 people shot.
HarveyKlinger ago
I used to run with that theory as well because you assume people got trampled or fell and got hurt or whatever but I keep reading news reports that "He killed almost 60 and shot almost 500." So I use their numbers now.
I don't disagree with you though.
1764_sugar_act ago
So you acknowledge this isn't true yet you post this bullshit anyway?
Why in the world would you take something a presstitute said as valuable? It has no value, it is only meant for propaganda purposes. You certainly can't use it as a premise for an argument.
Honestly, I would delete this post. It does nothing to further discussion and only makes Voat look bad. Just my 2 cents.
HarveyKlinger ago
Maybe you're unfamiliar with what a conspiracy is? Showing how all of their information doesn't make sense is part of what makes it a conspiracy... which is why I posted it in v/conspiracy and not v/news.
1764_sugar_act ago
I guess I'm just saying that no one who is reputable in the slightest has said that five hundred people were shot. Only dumb presstitutes.
I'm more concerned with all the holes in the story as presented by our FBI because of their authority on the matter.
Like the other poster said, this is akin to when a dumb whore of a presstitute calls an AK a glock. I wouldn't then go and say "See! It is a conspiracy because he had an AK!" No, she is just being a dumb whore doing her job.
I guess a point we might both agree on is that no jew is going to stop and correct these presstitutes when they make mistakes that are beneficial to the agenda, such as falsely claiming that five hundred plus people were shot.
HarveyKlinger ago
We're on the same page. I prefer to use THEIR words to show how stupid they are as opposed to correcting their misinformation for them. I need to see if I can find the article I read last night. It was kind of hilarious. It talked about all of the scopes he had piled up in his room then explained later that he didn't need any scopes to spray.
But here's a fun one: https://nypost.com/2017/10/03/the-tricked-out-guns-las-vegas-shooter-used-in-massacre/
But earlier in the article it states:
Yah, um... I own a Daniel Defense AR-15. It cost me about $1000 new a few months ago. But the article does state there were only 2 bump stocks (while other articles say 11 or 13).
Thegreatestname ago
The news used to always call rifles used in crimes ak-47's and pistols glocks. Inaccuracy is just the way of the media, it's about selling a point, not perfect accurate information distribution to the public.
And your example. "killed 58 people and injured more than 500" they say injured not shot. Even the killed 58 people someone might of had a heart attack and died caused by the shooting.
Even if 500 people were shot ~50% accuracy into a mass of flesh the size of a city block isn't that spectacular. Early audio analysis done by 4chan came up with the guy shooting about 1500shots. So figure 33% accuracy and likely it was much higher than that because people were likely hit more than once.
So I fail to see how this is anything other than a distraction from the real shady shit that is being covered up. Things like why did he rent a car when he owned one, what was his motive, and how did he earn a living.
HarveyKlinger ago
The only thing I disagree with in your response is that there was a mass of flesh. The venue was about 1/3 full at that time. The numbers given were TOTAL for the entire festival.