10 Compelling Reasons Why the Vegas Shooting Has Disappeared from Headlines
Now, a month and a half later, there are few answers to the most deadly mass shooting in recent U.S. history – and perhaps even more strange – the case has been jettisoned from the 24/7 mainstream media cycle, despite the fact that the most basic of questions have yet to be answered.
One would assume that such a high-profile case would garner widespread interest from investigative teams across the spectrum of major broadcast mass media and cable news, and yet, there are no penetrating journalistic investigations delving into the many unanswered questions.
In fact, coverage and investigation into the highly dubious shooting are virtually non-existent outside of online alternative news media.
-
The official timeline of the mass shooting has been changed at least three different times.
-
Paddock wired $100,000 to an account located in the Philippines a week prior to the massacre.
-
Investigators claim Paddock’s laptop was missing its hard drive when they found it in his hotel room.
-
Paddock reportedly took cruises that made port stops in the Middle East.
-
Authorities now claim an officer discharged his weapon in Paddock’s hotel room – after denying it for the first month after the attack. (This raises the question of why police discharged a weapon if Paddock had already committed suicide prior to law enforcement breaching the room? And why they lied about it after the fact.)
-
Security guard Jesus Campos, who reportedly came across Paddock as he began his attack was allegedly shot in the leg, but a spokesperson for UMC Quick Care, the walk-in health clinic facility Campos supposedly went to after being shot, said they had “heard nothing” about Campos visiting them.
-
During an interview on Fox News with Tucker Carlson, an attorney for the victims revealed that not only did police officers respond to Campos after he was shot, they were right outside of Paddock’s door before he began shooting out of his hotel room window. “As of yesterday it was that two—we knew about Campos—but there were two other police officers from MGM that were on the floor prior to the shooting,” Craig Eiland said.
-
Eiland also noted that MGM Grand claims to have a “corporate watch center” that trains its employees to report any suspicious activity. So if a guest arrived at Mandalay Bay Hotel with 27 rifles and 5,000 rounds of ammunition stored in 10 bags, why didn’t the employees who helped him, or the cleaning service who visited his room regularly, report suspicious activity? And if they did, why wasn’t it addressed?
-
On Halloween, a suspect, identified as Sayfullo Habibullaevic Saipov, rented a pickup truck, drove it onto a busy bicycle path and mowed down innocent people. Almost immediately after the horrific attack that left 8 dead and a dozen more injured, video of Saipov, an Uzbekistan native, was released. There has yet to be a single image of Stephen Paddock released from the thousands of cameras inside and outside of the Mandalay Bay Casino.
-
Campos disappeared days after the shooting, reportedly leaving the country, thus, being a no-show to numerous scheduled television news interviews. Upon his return to the U.S., he did a softball, scripted, interview on the Ellen DeGeneres Show where no penetrating journalism, nor tough questions were asked. The interview was almost comical in the sense that DeGeneres did more narrating of the actual events than Campos, which allowed for him to not divulge any information.
I highly recommend watching this playlist on End Times News Report's youtube channel. He has been doing extensive research on the Vegas shooting.
@HarveyKlinger posted NEW: NY Times doctoring/editing Vegas Shooting timeline? - This is a VERY well done video
@Cc1914 @new4now @Carmencita @ESOTERICshade @Commoner
view the rest of the comments →
LostandFound ago
Ola I will drop back later to provide more detail but theres MANY more questions surrounding this event. All I have for now is crumbs, over on 8ch was the most concentrated collection of autists I could find. Please have a look at this http://archive.is/Rfrmc / https://8ch.net/pol/res/10779049.html there's 8 threads so probably over 6k posts just on this.
re: point 7 it has been confirmed that there were two police officers inside the building when the shooting started.
Why a whole hour before they enter / Why use explosive breach thats not visible on the photos from outside the room - door looks pretty intact / why say that there were 200 rounds emptied into the building when theres little to no evidence of this taking place. Think what your front door would look like with 200 rounds peppered through it + then blown of its hinges.
This also was supposed to contain raw security footage https://hooktube.com/watch?v=A0RGF-ZEolM but was insta scrubbed from YT - hook should have copied it over but also scrubbed ....
Cigarette5mokingman ago
i have the raw security footage video. i saved it before it went down. you can see it (or atleast a segment of it on one of the tucker carlson clips easily found on youtube. if not, ask me, i can upload it someonewhere in its entirety. its over an hr of unedited security footage. not exactly sure of the location. Somewhere off of Giles by the church as far as I can tell.
thoht ago
Where...?
Cigarette5mokingman ago
Where what?
thoht ago
Sorry: where would this raw security footage video you mention be accessible? Would you be so kind as to upload the video and post a link in this thread (perhaps in your original comment) so other's can access it? Thank you.
Cigarette5mokingman ago
https://mega.nz/#!szQTRDbA
!m2FxdLYK-aNsjBRHvn87JFwgzoowW1ZYd15a3gqmRMQ
thoht ago
Thanks!!!! ^_^
Cigarette5mokingman ago
For reference, I have pinpointed the specific location of the camera: here
new4now ago
We never did see opposite wall of the door
Cigarette5mokingman ago
There is no wall opposite the door. The door to 32-135 faces down a long hallway.
new4now ago
Really doesn't matter I guess
Hotel, Police,FBI, Media all BSing anyways
Cigarette5mokingman ago
your point is still valid, we still have yet to see A LOT of things. (like paddock checking in to the hotel at least.) but i did need to clarify, as im sure many people are still confused by what happened/layout/etc.
new4now ago
The fact none of that stuff being supplied says a lot
They sure are mum, and with so many people involved, well it's like a Pandora box
LostandFound ago
It should have been a shit show, whats the internals of a hotel made from plaster and chipboard vs. 200 rounds from auto rifles at a few meters range. And we are supposed to believe that this was what was left as a result after 200 & an explosive breach. Plus consider that we were also told at one stage that paddock was drilling holes in the door when compos arrived.
https://i.imgtc.com/FKukxM3.jpg https://i.imgtc.com/xT8uPaO.jpeg
Cigarette5mokingman ago
Definitely not 200 rounds, but the door was definitely explosively breached. The explosion can be heard in the police scanner audio.
"Breach breach breach" KABOOM
LostandFound ago
I appreciate that but there's no damage on the visible section of the door or door frame. Why only breach on one side? More questions than answers on that one.
cynicaloldfart ago
HT doesn't host (or save) any content. It simply pulls from YT's api. So if it gets scrubbed from YT, HT can't access it.
LostandFound ago
TIL that something I thought I knew was wrong. Thanks for clarifying that :)
Cc1914 ago
Wow that video is already gone! I went to show it to my husband and poof!
Cc1914 ago
Wow that video says it all!
thoht ago
How do we know this video is even "real", as opposed to engineered? The public in general would not be expected to even be able to tell whether this is even Las Vegas, and whether this is even the night of the shootings. A well done analysis demonstrating these things would help, but it still doesn't preclude the possibility that this video itself might have been digitally altered to show whatever the creator wants it to show.
Cigarette5mokingman ago
The video is real. Theres no question about it. There's also another video from the same camera, the day afterward, that captures Sean Hannity and crew preparing and conducting an interview with a victim from the shooting.
thoht ago
I am a bit puzzled that there could be "no questions about it". In seeking truth, it is useful to question everything, and systematically subject the object(s) of our questioning to tests that will shed light on the matter. That's the whole reason for this thread, to begin with: questioning of the "official" story the mainstream uniformitarian media is feeding us. I honestly barely understand what I'm looking at when I see the video referenced above, and what is being implied. There's a helicopter at night, presumably flying in a city that is implied to be Las Vegas, at night, presumably on the date of the recent massacre. However, 1) how does the viewer know this is actually Las Vegas, if you've never been there or if you're simply not familiar with the city from this view?. A comparison between known pictures and/or videos of Vegas as viewed from that angle with the footage in the video would help to establish that this is indeed Vegas. Then there's the issue of timing. 2) How would one be reassured that this video was taken the night of the massacre? 3) It does indeed seem like this helicopter is shooting gunfire, but we cannot see what it might be shooting at. How is it "clear" that it is shooting at the crowd? 4) Are there possible alternative explanations to what we're seeing in the video? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1j35hVO6sPg
Cigarette5mokingman ago
not sure if we're speaking about the same video. i'm talking about the raw security footage facing the fuel takes. Its an hr and half of video from a motion sensor camera close to the route 91 venue. It was featured on Tucker Carlson (in segmented form). If you would like to see it in full, I linked you above a download option. Sorry for the confusion.
Cc1914 ago
How do " we" ? You've been a member for 12 hours and you say "how do we even know if it's Real ?" There are plenty more videos just like that out there . Kinda hard to engineer
thoht ago
I am unsure how the length of time I have been a member on Voat under this username is relevant at all. For all you know, I might have been a member with other usernames for much longer. Anyway, by "we", I mean "humanity", or, more generally "whoever watches the video". It would be very useful to reassure the viewer if these other videos were posted along with the one above. Multiple pieces of evidence from various sources would make the case for the video a lot stronger. I disagree that this would be hard to engineer. Consider the highly advanced state of our current technology, as in the following small example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Yq67CjDqvw
Cc1914 ago
Ok fair.. What I'm saying is there are several homegrown videos showing the same helicopters . To me it seems hard to have people who randomly came up with similar stories of what happened . Who really knows .. this whole thing , and the Santa Rosa fires plus numerous other so-called natural happenings , it's just insane !
thoht ago
I was trying to post a speculative possibility, but I don't have enough CCP under this username to do so. Alas, I'm even limited to 10 comments per day -hence my delay in replying here U_Uu. I agree there's a lot of insanity in the world -but linking the Santa Rosa wild fires to the Las Vegas massacre is quite a leap. California experiences wild fires periodically (possibly at an increasing rate, given the changing climate).
Cc1914 ago
I'm not linking the fires to Vegas . Just was pointing out that it's all insane.