There are now multiple "Hillary says..." memes coming out, which range from surprising to offensive.
Then there's a ridiculous thread over on the Conspiracy subRed about her hateful book reviews.
Most will not believe that HRC is already passed on (see Victory of the Light tweets), and there're quite a few YT videos analyzing the fact that at many (odd) appearances, she doesn't look like herself (one even had buck teeth). Sure you could argue that those are body doubles, since this is supposedly common among politicians. However, given all the black projects and suppressed technologies (see 5,000+ US patents hidden away/confiscated for "national security"), it's MORE likely all these are clones of HRC, given her polarizing public persona, she must be "maintained" as a propaganda + distraction tool.
She will continue to be used by the MSM and intel agencies as distraction fodder until full disclosure happens.
clamhurt_legbeard ago
If you think secret cloning technology that either a) quickly ages the clone to age 70, or b) existed decades ago, is more probable than padding and makeup on a person acting as a body-double then you have no idea how probability works.
You're a moron.
englishwebster ago
while I don't doubt that govt has tech they wont share for one reason or another, I have a real hard time absorbing the idea of a clone. shes 70 years old. if her clones are too then that suggests perfect cloning was done in 1950.
and no, i wont buy into the concept of faster aging or growing in a test tube or whatever. shes still alive and yes, she is part of a major distraction. but a clone? no.