ardvarcus ago

She had that one all set to go regardless of terrorism or elections results or whatever, just as George W. Bush had the invasion of Afghanistan all set to go and was only waiting for a trigger to justify it.

cm18 ago

Woundn't in be better to just eject the immigrants causing terror attacks?

"He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither."

But, perhaps that's the idea. Continue to import terrorists so you have "justification" for sacrificing freedom. Problem is... that game is getting old and people know it.

derram ago

https://archive.is/KnjIC | :

Theresa May to launch wide-ranging internet regulation and security changes despite not winning majority | The Independent

'Theresa May looks set to launch wide-ranging internet regulation and plans to fundamentally change how technology works despite not having won a majority. '

'She said after the London Bridge attack that she planned four ways to stop terror, which included internet regulation alongside countering propaganda and segregation. '

'Experts have warned that those plans for internet regulation could in fact make life easier for terrorists. ', "Almost all of Ms May's plans for stopping terror have focused on internet communications, despite there being no proof that they are responsible for recent attacks."

'Her manifesto had laid out wide-ranging plans to regulate the internet, which included a commitment to become the "global leader in the regulation of the use of personal data and the internet". '

This has been an automated message.

JesusRules ago

That was the whole purpose of the terror attacks, to take away more rights of the people towards a security state. Similar to 911, the Patriot Act was written before 911.