No problem. While I'm pondering, what are the chances Seth Rich is NOT the leaker and is a complete nonstory to lead everyone down a false path?
Assange seemed to imply it, but he could have done that to protect the real leaker..
Just a thought.. Unfortunately I'm a skeptic, and I think it's highly likely WLeaks was compromised late last year, if the whole thing wasn't a sham from start to finish, which is still on the table for me.
Of the two narratives, I believe that Seth Rich was the leaker over the Russians. I would like to see half of the resources dedicated into investigating the Seth Rich story as is put into the Russian story.
Haha, the Russians. If anything at all, the information was released to HELP Americans. They exposed corruption, fraud and horrors of human trafficking.
If the Russians did it (haha), I would consider them my friend.
But I have no doubt the Russians are deadly and powerful, and we should stop poking the fucken bear.
I guess leaving the Seth Rich case as an unsolved murder does "send a message" like Podesta mentioned in an email. But I also think the person who pulled the trigger was likely a trained assassin, and not a known name. We would have to prove the people who hired him and decided his fate, which is only going to be done with emails/texts/etc.
Let me guess, they have all this evidence, but it's matter of "national security."
view the rest of the comments →
FE_Rebekah ago
If he's in witness protection, why leave it as an "unsolved murder" rather than car accident or alcohol poisoning or suicide?
If he's in witness protection or not, why would "they" leave the case as open? Unless they are setting up a patsy too, I don't get the logic.
If it's a real murder, why make it look like a real unsolved murder?
If it's not a real murder, why make it look like a real unsolved murder??
Honestly, none of it is making any sense to me.
strange_69 ago
Thank you. All good points.
FE_Rebekah ago
No problem. While I'm pondering, what are the chances Seth Rich is NOT the leaker and is a complete nonstory to lead everyone down a false path?
Assange seemed to imply it, but he could have done that to protect the real leaker..
Just a thought.. Unfortunately I'm a skeptic, and I think it's highly likely WLeaks was compromised late last year, if the whole thing wasn't a sham from start to finish, which is still on the table for me.
strange_69 ago
Of the two narratives, I believe that Seth Rich was the leaker over the Russians. I would like to see half of the resources dedicated into investigating the Seth Rich story as is put into the Russian story.
FE_Rebekah ago
Haha, the Russians. If anything at all, the information was released to HELP Americans. They exposed corruption, fraud and horrors of human trafficking.
If the Russians did it (haha), I would consider them my friend.
But I have no doubt the Russians are deadly and powerful, and we should stop poking the fucken bear.
I guess leaving the Seth Rich case as an unsolved murder does "send a message" like Podesta mentioned in an email. But I also think the person who pulled the trigger was likely a trained assassin, and not a known name. We would have to prove the people who hired him and decided his fate, which is only going to be done with emails/texts/etc.
Let me guess, they have all this evidence, but it's matter of "national security."