I've noticed on Voat that the discussion on the front page often centers on the Muslim terror attack du jour.
However if you've been paying attention and thinking critically for the past decade or so, you'll know that basically every Muslim terror attack from San Bernardino to Charli Hebdo to the Westminster 3/22 attack were all staged events. It couldn't be more obvious that there was a definite point in time in our lives when the United States chose to switch its fearsome bogeymen from the Russian Communist to the radical lone wolf Islamic extremist.
I'm not here to dispute whether every rape and murder or act of vandalism by a Muslim refugee is authentic. I'm sure they are low-IQ primitive people who don't behave like Westerners in western society.
I'm not here to make a pro-Islam or pro-Immigration statement at all, in fact there are plenty of good reasons to oppose the transformation of Europe and the US via immigration.
I'm not really here to debate the authenticity of any major terror attack. From my extensive research I can't think of a single one that wasn't a state-sponsored fabricated hoax event complete with crisis actors, a coincident terror drill, a guy yelling "Allah Akbar," conflicting reports, lack of real medical response, etc.
Even if you show someone on Voat hard evidence of a terror attack being faked, such as the goofy hoax that took place in London on 3/22, where there wasn't even blood on either of the knives, or where a dummy was literally placed under a bus wheel but showed no signs of having been crushed, the person might say "You're a retard because we already know Muslims do things like this" -- and they are referencing three or four other terror attacks that were also fake!
They simply don't understand that it's in the interest of the powers that be to inculcate this blind fear and hatred of Muslims. I'm not saying we need to go out and hug Muslims and make Refugees Welcome signs. I'm saying we need to seriously consider all evidence that confirms the fact that there hasn't been a single terror event reported as having been committed by jihadists that was a real attack with real injuries. I will now list the ones I can think of and we'll see if there's actually a single attack that was actually perpetrated by Muslims or if Voaters are simply circlejerking in tune to the mainstream media.
7/7 London Subway bombing
9/11
Boston Hoaxathon Bombing
San Bernardino
Nice truck attack
German Christmas truck attack
Charli Hebdo
Ohio State University car attack
Brussels bombing
Paris Bataclan Hoax
Sweden truck attack
I'm sure I forgot some. All of the above are proven frauds, demonstrable hoaxes; yet they serve as some kind of evidence to the ignorant Voater who, because of their prominence in the MSM and sensationalism, assumes them to be legitimate and make any other report of a new Muslim terror attack more believable.
It's basically a cycle of bullshit that right-wingers are stuck in. They're so eager to have their anti-Muslim opinions verified and substantiated that they believe any garbage put out by the media networks without stopping for one minute to look at the evidence and see that they're being rooked.
view the rest of the comments →
fremar ago
i believe most of the attacks are falseflag ops. with real victims. from the moment the terrorists use the sewer system for a attack i'll believe it to be true. (sewer system is full of methane gas which is highly explosive, using this will completely immobilize a city , bring disease , rats , etc ; TRUE terror) the attacks are not STAGED , they are REAL.
blackguard19 ago
From my research it's obvious to me that none of the above attacks with the exception (maybe!) of 9/11 had any real victims. With Boston Marathon for example, there were amputee actors and fake blood and the same is true for several of these. In other words there's no evidence of any real injuries or real medical response
fremar ago
true, if you look to the shooting from paris in the concerthall, there were 1500 people there, only 96 injured or dead , then the "terorists" make it a hostage , then one of them is on the run, gets persued by police , and instead of capturing the guy, interrogate for more information , they shoot him dead ! this was so telling for me... the police never wanted any answers because they had NO questions ! it are all false flag ops , even 911 .
blackguard19 ago
Even the photo of the Bataclan was clearly staged. We only got that one photo of all the "dead bodies" but it just doesn't reflect reality at all. So many times in events like these when you get "graphic images" they are grainy low-res pics and this is no exception. And you can see how the fake blood smear was mopped into a heart shape in a very unnatural way. Some of the bodies look like dummies and do not have blood exuding from them.
Then if you look into the history of the Bataclan and the band that was allegedly playing at the time, they look like Mossad ops. The whole thing was a farce with fake blood and bad acting.
fremar ago
the band are not with the mossad , the singer is a friend from josh homme ( queens o/t stone age ) the ex mossads i have met are pretty big guys and jews. that singer is not a jew nor is he big enough to be a mossad agent. the photos could be staged , i find more answers in the actions of the police and justice department.
blackguard19 ago
Well there are Israeli ties to the theater itself and as with any false flag where Islamic terror is blamed you can assume Mossad has a hand in it. I can't pinpoint the band's connection to Israel but I know they have toured there and Jesse Hughes made strong pro-Israel, anti-BDS statements.
The entire band seems to me to have been a cover-up. I don't view them as even a real band, but as some kind of outfit for the purpose of adding a Satanic theme to this fake shooting. If you listen to their songs, they're so incredibly bad that it's almost impossible to believe they are even a real band, let alone one that people would pay to see.
fremar ago
well trust me , thats not a satanic band , its more pop/punk/rock band. and its a real band. when someone visits israel , it doesnt mean they are for sure with the mossad or any secret agency. there are probbably a lot of bands touring there. that doesnt make them affiliated with the mossad. trust me , you do not get easily hired by the mossad.why don't you settle for the government itself from france/brittain/germany/usa/etc , they all answer to the same elite.
blackguard19 ago
Absolutely I think the people who do this are some kind of NATO troupe that is enacting a one-world governmental agenda, like you say.
However, the instances where Israel has connections in many of these events I've named are too numerous not to notice, and it only follows that their intel agency would carry out some of the hoaxing.
In fact like with 9/11 we see that the perpetrators operate on long time scales and plan these events years in advance. It wouldn't surprise me therefore to find out that a band had been formed with the idea in mind that one day they would participate in a staged shooting.
One of the other photos from the Bataclan event that surfaced here recently was a picture allegedly right before the shooting broke out, and was extensively photoshopped to include people making the Satan horns hand gesture. The song the Eagles were playing at the time, allegedly, in fact was called "Kiss The Devil."
You're right that one comment or appearance in Israel does not prove any real connection, but I'm saying the band was definitely "in on it."