If someone tells me "This _____ happened to me last month", I might be inclined to believe them, or not. But by getting multiple witnesses on said event, the chances of it actually happening increase, correlated with the number of credible witnesses.
At least three people that I've come across in my research have stated on the record in interviews that there have been discoveries of ancient technologies in Antarctica and that is why we have been seeing many dignitaries and politicians visiting down there including Obama and John Kerry (on election day of all times!).
I've spent many years researching and contemplating ET, genetic manipulation, antigravitics and darn near all authors and lecturers there are on these subjects, and I -- for the first time in my life -- am convinced we are on the cusp of at least partial disclosure.
Anyway, onto the names:
* Clif High (Linguistic programmer via big data analysis, claims can tease out future events based on combing millions of data sets.
* Corey Goode
* Max Spiers (likely died for his research and claims)
DearClaudio ago
I want to see something on this matter that doesn't scream distraction.
itsafuckshitstack ago
i wouldnt count on disclosure though