Thimerosal and aluminum hydroxide are used as vaccine activators. Those activators provoke the immune system which then searches for the cause and hopefully focuses on the vaccine elements. But if other foreign elements like pollen are present the immune system may focus on them, and we get a nice pollen allergy. An allergy is an overreacting immune system.
Maybe we should not vaccinate our kids in times with high pollen concentrations. Your thoughts?
view the rest of the comments →
gazillions ago
Since this in conspiracy here's one for you. Why is it white people who think letting their kid die from disease is better than vaccinating them? Add to that the idea of euthanasia as a white thing. Few others are crying out for it. Abortions are mainly white and black unless it's sex selective abortion coming from one of the cultures that kills girls anyway.
L48B ago
Sorry, most of those diseases are not deadly or crippling in any way. There are a lot of toally stupid vaxinations like flu. Exceptions, like polio, exist. Measels vaccine is more dangerous than naturally getting measels ... let that sink in.
What do you think does cause the massive increase in allergies ? As a victim myself i can assure you allergies have a very heavy impact on my life.
gazillions ago
I grew up with a kid who was deaf because her mother was exposed to measles while she was pregnant with her. You don't see that anymore, so you don't think it can happen. It used to happen more frequently. The kids were sent to boarding schools for the deaf.those schools weren't tiny, they were large. Up until the early 1980's two and a half million people a year died of measles. Shrug away polio if you want, but it was deadly in real life, not just in your imagination. Between 3 to 5% of the entire population died of the flu after ww 1 People still die of the flu.
Look up small pox on wiki.
But then overpopulation is a huge problem and people dying is what nature is all about. Just don't bother imagining that means people in far away, undeveloped parts of the world that you have no business with. It means you and your family as well.
Figbash ago
"Between 3 to 5% of the entire population died of the flu after ww 1 People still die of the flu."
If you are referring to the Spanish Influenza epidemic, is started DURING WWI, and it wasn't the flu that killed so many. It was the immunological response to it. That's why it killed mostly the young and healthy and spared the very young and the elderly. And why transmission was so high; soldiers returning to and being shipped off to war. Deaths from "influenza" today are mostly the immune compromised, those on chemo, dialysis, the elderly with secondary problems, and a large part of the population is afflicted with 'first world diseases' like cardiovascular, diabetes and cancer, making them more likely to die from a secondary infection that causes organ failure because they already are one foot in the grave. Most of your big pharma drugs give alerts that if you have TB or exposed to certain diseases, not to take them because they essentially KILL your immune system.
"But then overpopulation is a huge problem.."
don't fret on that buttercup, the marxists are fomenting WWIII as we speak to take care of that "overpopulation" problem.
gazillions ago
Ugh. People don't die from cancer, they die drom their body's response to it. People who die from the flu are not all elderly, or ill with something else. Also the flu viruses mutate constantly. It may or my not be a good thing to get flu shots. I generally do not. But I've never seen a valid or good argument against them. Except for quit saving everybody as a general phisophy.