You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

294618357 ago

What ever happened to the federal government only being permitted to hold the 10 square miles of D.C., some ports, and military bases? Any act by US Congress(should be United States in congress assembled) that violates the agreement established in The Constitution for the united States of America is void, unless something changed? Smells like UN's Agenda 2030 to me. Declare almost all land protected via some bullshit act or another, and force a migration into the major cities.

Thomascro83 ago

What's makes it worse IMO is that it's no longer going through the states as it ahould. They are just declaring it and passing it. There's a huge fight about it in Utah right now over 2 newly declared federal landmarks. Now they can lease the land to businessmen who build hotels and resorts.

294618357 ago

Exactly. People delegate a certain amount of responsibility to the city/town level, which delegates a certain amount to the county, then to the state. Last and least is the federal government. The Constitution for the united States of America is the supreme law of the land because it's the terms and conditions by which we allow the federal(aka contractor) government to be on our land. They are British subjects(Citizens) known as Inhabitants of the United States allowed to reside on the land(residents). The indigenous people have domicile and are known as the free, sovereign, and independent People of the United States according to The Definitive Treaty of Peace( Treaty of Paris)