Basically I'm good at math and have a really strong intuition. I am really feeling like I'm onto something big here okay. Follow with me in this simple piece of math I will share with you. I strongly suggest you try your own experiments as this is deep knowledge I have figured out myself you won't hear elsewhere.
My theories are as such and you must apply the philosophy to anything you wish to uncover on this plane.
The digits 1-9 being single digits 10-99 being double and 100-999 being triple is a lie.
The digits should work as such -
Single digits 1-11
Double digits 12-143
Triple digits 144-1727
Using this method of thinking you remove your assumption 1+1=2. It's wrong, it doesn't all of math is wrong in theory. 1 is actually 1.08 so 1+1 is actually 2.16 roughly.
Using this logic of thinking I have decoded something that has to do with Pie, I am not sure if there is a reward but I am claiming it with this post.
We don't live in a 3d reality. We live in a 4d reality. 3D reality is merely 3 dimensions 3 being 30% of 10, 4 being 33.3% of 12.
I will share with you some math here that is very simple. People will troll it but use your brain and think and you can peel back that even math is wrong and how you can correct it.
http://pad3.whstatic.com/images/thumb/7/72/Equal-Areas.jpg/900px-Equal-Areas.jpg
This is the model we will use. I am going to throw at you simple math so please try to follow I'll answer questions til I go to bed.
First I will remind everyone we are going to attempt to convert everything as if digits were to 12 and not to 10. By doing that you adjust by % I believe.
3.33 = 4 (Because 3.33/10 = 4/12)
3.1415=3.75~
3.75 is exactly 15/16ths of 4.
The way you find pie is by creating a circle with the same area as a square. Assuming all numbers go to 12.
If 3.33 is really 4 then pie is really somewhere around 3.75. The reason it is where it is is because -
If you find the area to those two shapes the square and the circles they both equal.
The area is pie 3.1415
1.77x.177 = 3.13
Almost the same area, for that reason since 3.75 (pie) is 15/16ths of 4, the perimeter of the circle will be 15/16ths of the square.
1.77x4= 7.08
Pie(diameter) = 6.28 - This number is off by a bit because it's .8 difference which is about 12% instead of the 6.5% I was hoping close to. Remember above we aren't exactly in line so there is going to be some sway
In conclusions even though the numbers don't add up exactly. I believe you can calculate pie by converting all digits as thou they are single digits until 12 instead of 10. Making 144 the value of 144 but treated like the number 100. Making the number 100 the value of 100 but treated like a 2 digit number.
Our reality is made for numbers to be like this and pie is really calculated by figuring out by reversing the formulas they gave us and compensating for the number changes.
Cheers write feed back please it is late I work tomorrow I would write more otherwise and make working equations.
Pie - perimeter - radius = X - perimeter - side lengths
If you're following sweet I hope when I get home in 16 hours there is something here, cheers all.
view the rest of the comments →
antiracistNew ago
This post was really hard to follow.
Are you doing anything different than working in base 12?
What does the reality we live in have to do with math?
What benefit is there to computing pi in this manner?
@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh
scandalous-goat ago
It's not base 12… it is some sort of exponential base, I think.edit: never mind, I was not calculating the numbers properly.
antiracistNew ago
I still have no idea wtf is going on. How does he get 1 to be 1.08?
Flat_Earth-Fat_Girth ago
Because I am saying we are missing 2 single digit numbers in our mix. The ancient method is that way definitely. It's waved in our face.
antiracistNew ago
Then that's base 12. And 1 is still 1 in base 12, not 1.08.
Where do you get 1.08 from?
Use A and B as your extra single digits.
Then all of your single digits are:
1) 0
2) 1
3) 2
...
9) 8
10) 9
11) A
12) B
So there we have 12 single digits, from 0 to B.
How the hell do we get 1.08 from that?
Flat_Earth-Fat_Girth ago
We don't ignore it, I never used that in any part of the equations I showed anyway. lol.
antiracistNew ago
Why aren't you counting 0 as a single digit?
Flat_Earth-Fat_Girth ago
i am just didnt write it in that one instance