One individual will say anything to stop another individual from torturing the first.
The information obtained is based on selfish interests (not wanting to drown), and not concluded based on solid intelligence or facts.
Let's say a terrorist breaks into your house and starts torturing you. They want to know if Bush was behind 911. Will you tell them Bush is responsible to stop the torture, or will you continue to feel like you are going to die for several hours because "solid intelligence" is so fucking important?
view the rest of the comments →
Cant_Call_It ago
Can someone dumb this down for the ignorant?
cyks ago
One individual will say anything to stop another individual from torturing the first.
The information obtained is based on selfish interests (not wanting to drown), and not concluded based on solid intelligence or facts.
Let's say a terrorist breaks into your house and starts torturing you. They want to know if Bush was behind 911. Will you tell them Bush is responsible to stop the torture, or will you continue to feel like you are going to die for several hours because "solid intelligence" is so fucking important?
Cant_Call_It ago
Oh. I thought there was more to this image than that. I assumed I was missing something. I appreciate the explanation though!
Vaati ago
TL;DR The CIA effed up with the information arguing for the war in Iraq
B3nd3r ago
Nope. They got exactly what they wanted. Everything went according to plan.