Well there's quite a bit of misinformation in there, but thank you for clarifying that you don't like feminists. I wouldn't have guessed.
This part in particular:
"The problem you claim is when an ISP is also a content provider, such as Comcast providing cable TV and Internet, and they make streaming video suck unless it's their traffic -- This isn't a problem if other ISPs can compete with them. Then a smaller or municipal ISP could provide a better service. We lack choice due to government sanctioned oligopolies -- but the left doesn't like to think about that too hard"
Are you fucking crazy? This is exactly the issue that the left has a problem with. Government sanctioned monopolies. Your orange-faced ignoramus has nominated a man for Secretary of State who has a vested interest in circumventing or derailing international sanctions against Russia so that he can line his pockets with more billions. It's the most corrupt abuse of power since Nixon and he hasn't even been sworn in yet.
Comcast owns MSNBC. Do you want everyone who has no choice but to use Comcast for internet service (a good chunk of America) to get free MSNBC in their homes and on their cell phones but have to pay for FAUX News? Why would you want this? How are you dipshits going to get your made up stories about child sex slaves in pizza parlors? It doesn't matter what the law currently says. This should be illegal. I don't accept your basic premise that "Net Neutrality" is a piece of legislation and not an idea. That's like saying you don't believe murder should be illegal because you don't believe in the death penalty. If you don't like the way the law is written, then oppose that, not the principle.
view the rest of the comments →
split ago
Well there's quite a bit of misinformation in there, but thank you for clarifying that you don't like feminists. I wouldn't have guessed.
This part in particular:
"The problem you claim is when an ISP is also a content provider, such as Comcast providing cable TV and Internet, and they make streaming video suck unless it's their traffic -- This isn't a problem if other ISPs can compete with them. Then a smaller or municipal ISP could provide a better service. We lack choice due to government sanctioned oligopolies -- but the left doesn't like to think about that too hard"
Are you fucking crazy? This is exactly the issue that the left has a problem with. Government sanctioned monopolies. Your orange-faced ignoramus has nominated a man for Secretary of State who has a vested interest in circumventing or derailing international sanctions against Russia so that he can line his pockets with more billions. It's the most corrupt abuse of power since Nixon and he hasn't even been sworn in yet.
Comcast owns MSNBC. Do you want everyone who has no choice but to use Comcast for internet service (a good chunk of America) to get free MSNBC in their homes and on their cell phones but have to pay for FAUX News? Why would you want this? How are you dipshits going to get your made up stories about child sex slaves in pizza parlors? It doesn't matter what the law currently says. This should be illegal. I don't accept your basic premise that "Net Neutrality" is a piece of legislation and not an idea. That's like saying you don't believe murder should be illegal because you don't believe in the death penalty. If you don't like the way the law is written, then oppose that, not the principle.