Fuck off with your bullshit, that's your answer for everything isn't it, either they're a Jew or some pet Goy. And no matter how slowly and patiently you go over the historical evidence to dare suggest you might be talking crap, you'll still insist that Jewish/Zionist bankers engineered the Holocaust, which didn’t kill that many people anyway, simply to justify Israel’s something-something-something anti-Semitism. Or some bullshit like that.
Doesn't it occur to you that even if you're charitable towards the evidence. That is, pretend you're not utter talking crap, cheery picking crap, or holding things that discredit your argument to impossibly high standards - like I dunno, actual filmed footage - but ignoring the holes in your own evidence. Even then these arguments still simply make no fucking sense, for example even if Zionists secretly control central banks then why the fuck would their end goal be Communism which is a form of government that would effectively nullify their power. Surely their interest would be in promoting free market capitalism. It's illogical in the same way as to why it's illogical a trade federation would create a blockade to limit trade in Star Wars: The Phantom Menace.
And btw, Jews invented communism in the first place.
Also, David Brooks, a Jewish political analyst that works for the New York Times wrote an article called "The chosen getting in" where he fully admits that Jews have supplanted the Anglo Saxon elites and now control America.
So it's conspiracy when a Gentile says it, but gets published in the New York Times when a Jew says it?
We know that Jews own the media and central banks and are the people pushing multiculturalism and Leftism on Western civilization. Everything has been admitted and is well documented.
Right I'll accept all that crap as being true. Why in the fuck would they be actively promoting Leftism on Western civilization if all it's going to undermine their own position? That is by undermining the very institutions that they apparently control already, like the government, central banks or the media. Do you not see how this doesn't make any fucking sense? This is like a tyrant willingly putting themselves to the guillotine in order to promote a revolution against themselves.
Now fuck off shill. Jews invented communism you fucking retard. You don't know anything. Karl Marx was Jewish, Lenin was Jew, Trotsky, the Bolsheviks... And many more. Communism was invented by Jews and 78% of Jews vote left.
You're failing to address the obvious contradiction of you're argument: If like you say Jews love Communism why would they then be in control of the same institutions that they are apparently against, like the government or the banks or corporations etc? It would be like punching yourself in the balls.
Christ it's like a kid came up with this shit. Actually, it's like one of those things you used to think when you were a child that you never realized weren't true until an embarrassingly late age due to having never sat down to think about it.
The first paragraph of the Wikipedia article on Communism states: "In political and social sciences, communism (from Latin communis, "common, universal") is a social, political, and economic ideology and movement whose ultimate goal is the establishment of the communist society, which is a socioeconomic order structured upon the common ownership of the means of production and the absence of social classes, money, and the state."
The Soviet Union had one central bank called the Gosbank which was heavily under state control. Also they didn't really have corporations but rather cooperatives or state run enterprises.. As a thought experiment if there was to be a communist revolution tomorrow like that of the Soviet Union then it is likely that central bankers would be the first against the wall with all their assets seized and redistributed among the people. I don't see any of the Rothschilds being too keen on that prospect, somehow.
OK, If we're being charitable you could argue that there are differing forms of communism that ought not be lumped together with what happened in the Soviet Union - or whether what was practiced in the Soviet Union was really communism at all. But even then there still seem to be clear contradictions present to that of communism and the interests of central bankers that you can't really ignore. So even if you argued that the Soviet Union was closer to being a dictatorship even then if you're a central banker then you're probably still not going to be interested in that state of affairs much either due to the fact that it's likely that whoever has the power is simply going raid your house in the middle the night and murder you just to nick all your stuff. Which probably has some historical precedent somewhere. Yeah I suppose you could suck up to whatever regime is in power but it seems obvious to me that if you have any wealth then your interest would be more into cynically limiting how much power a regime has lest they get around to coming after you.
If it is about collectivizing power - to the point of essentially becoming a part of the regime - and not money then what would be the fucking point? Who wants to be in charge of some system slowly eating itself when your energy would be better spent just figuring ways to skim off wealth.
" If it is about collectivizing power - to the point of essentially becoming a part of the regime - and not money then what would be the fucking point? Who wants to be in charge of some system slowly eating itself when your energy would be better spent just figuring ways to skim off wealth."
That is what it's about. Some will argue that communism is basically Judaism put into modern political form. The Jews don't care about wealth. They print it. They want power. They want to rule over us. Communism is a more totalitarian form of government. It's a system of government that will give them more control over the people than current Western modes of government will permit.
Why let the West decline under a communist government?
Because Israel is their country. They want Israel to prosper and the West to decline. They don't care about the West. They basically just want to control a bunch of impoverished peasants. Poor people are easier to rule over.
"They want power. They want to rule over us." Why, like seriously why?
Who the hell wants to rule over a bunch of peasants? All they're ever going to do is get unhappy with their lot and revolt. In fact they're arguably harder control because they actually have stuff to lose, so there is nothing holding them back. If you just wanted to run a failed state there are plenty of those in Africa already. There is literally no motivation for this by itself. If their interest is power and not money then their welcome to run the fucking show, 'cause you couldn't do a worse job, in these places. Surely the better thing to do is to cynically put yourself in a postilion where you're making massive amounts of money because you literally are the bank. And in such a situation you would what to be involved with a successful country due to the fact that there would be more money to skim. The last possible thing you would want is to have a revolution or a dictatorship that is going to potentially fuck with that arrangement. I would argue that this is what Judaism is about rather that any notions of having power just because. This notion that you want power just for the sake of having power just doesn't make sense.
Also, If they wanted the West to decline because of Israel then who is going to defend them from the billion plus Muslims who all want to see them wiped off the face of the earth?
Hypothetically speaking: Would you go to work for free even if you're the boss and got to order people around? That would be fun for a bit but then after a while would anyone still continue to do this for free without having any benefit to themselves? Sure some might like having the feeling of authority or continue for some ideological reasons but after awhile most people will eventually want to get paid or otherwise use this position to advance their own agenda somehow. Added to this would be the responsibility to keep this shared delusion going as long as possible otherwise having to deal with the prospect of it falling apart with could potentially get you executed. Power isn't really a top down thing when you think about it but rather organic in nature. That is Caesar is only Caesar because everyone around him believes this to be so, and if he doesn't do his job well enough there are more than enough people willing to knife him in the back. What you have are corrupt institutions built upon nepotism and self interest with idiots looking to fuck each other over at the first opportunity, If you want to be racist then I suppose you could say that Jews simply excel in this environment.
Also Israel makes use of a lot of American equipment, controls a tiny area of land and has an infinitesimal population in comparison to the Arab world. While their military punches above their weight for sure the fact remains that if the US and Europe were to stop existing tomorrow then they would get wiped off the face of the earth in a heartbeat just through sheer weight of numbers. Due to being completely surrounded by enemies. And If you're arguing that they're able to protect themselves then you're in effect defeating your own argument because then they would have no interest in what would happen in other countries.
I'm thinking that you've just not actually sat down and thought this through.
view the rest of the comments →
RedditSuxBalls ago
Fuck off with your bullshit, that's your answer for everything isn't it, either they're a Jew or some pet Goy. And no matter how slowly and patiently you go over the historical evidence to dare suggest you might be talking crap, you'll still insist that Jewish/Zionist bankers engineered the Holocaust, which didn’t kill that many people anyway, simply to justify Israel’s something-something-something anti-Semitism. Or some bullshit like that.
Doesn't it occur to you that even if you're charitable towards the evidence. That is, pretend you're not utter talking crap, cheery picking crap, or holding things that discredit your argument to impossibly high standards - like I dunno, actual filmed footage - but ignoring the holes in your own evidence. Even then these arguments still simply make no fucking sense, for example even if Zionists secretly control central banks then why the fuck would their end goal be Communism which is a form of government that would effectively nullify their power. Surely their interest would be in promoting free market capitalism. It's illogical in the same way as to why it's illogical a trade federation would create a blockade to limit trade in Star Wars: The Phantom Menace.
HillarysPenis ago
There is no conspiracy. Everything is admitted.
And btw, Jews invented communism in the first place.
Also, David Brooks, a Jewish political analyst that works for the New York Times wrote an article called "The chosen getting in" where he fully admits that Jews have supplanted the Anglo Saxon elites and now control America.
So it's conspiracy when a Gentile says it, but gets published in the New York Times when a Jew says it?
We know that Jews own the media and central banks and are the people pushing multiculturalism and Leftism on Western civilization. Everything has been admitted and is well documented.
Your shilling has no power here. Beat it Jew.
RedditSuxBalls ago
Right I'll accept all that crap as being true. Why in the fuck would they be actively promoting Leftism on Western civilization if all it's going to undermine their own position? That is by undermining the very institutions that they apparently control already, like the government, central banks or the media. Do you not see how this doesn't make any fucking sense? This is like a tyrant willingly putting themselves to the guillotine in order to promote a revolution against themselves.
HillarysPenis ago
78% of Jews vote left.
http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/ben-shapiro-why-jews-vote-leftist
Now fuck off shill. Jews invented communism you fucking retard. You don't know anything. Karl Marx was Jewish, Lenin was Jew, Trotsky, the Bolsheviks... And many more. Communism was invented by Jews and 78% of Jews vote left.
Now stop shilling.
RedditSuxBalls ago
You're failing to address the obvious contradiction of you're argument: If like you say Jews love Communism why would they then be in control of the same institutions that they are apparently against, like the government or the banks or corporations etc? It would be like punching yourself in the balls.
Christ it's like a kid came up with this shit. Actually, it's like one of those things you used to think when you were a child that you never realized weren't true until an embarrassingly late age due to having never sat down to think about it.
HillarysPenis ago
And who the fuck says that communists oppose banks and corporations?
You don't think the Soviet Union had banks and corporations?
The Jews will control everything. The government, the banks and the corporations. Like the already do.
It's about control, not money. They'd rather governmental control over economic control.
RedditSuxBalls ago
The first paragraph of the Wikipedia article on Communism states: "In political and social sciences, communism (from Latin communis, "common, universal") is a social, political, and economic ideology and movement whose ultimate goal is the establishment of the communist society, which is a socioeconomic order structured upon the common ownership of the means of production and the absence of social classes, money, and the state."
The Soviet Union had one central bank called the Gosbank which was heavily under state control. Also they didn't really have corporations but rather cooperatives or state run enterprises.. As a thought experiment if there was to be a communist revolution tomorrow like that of the Soviet Union then it is likely that central bankers would be the first against the wall with all their assets seized and redistributed among the people. I don't see any of the Rothschilds being too keen on that prospect, somehow.
OK, If we're being charitable you could argue that there are differing forms of communism that ought not be lumped together with what happened in the Soviet Union - or whether what was practiced in the Soviet Union was really communism at all. But even then there still seem to be clear contradictions present to that of communism and the interests of central bankers that you can't really ignore. So even if you argued that the Soviet Union was closer to being a dictatorship even then if you're a central banker then you're probably still not going to be interested in that state of affairs much either due to the fact that it's likely that whoever has the power is simply going raid your house in the middle the night and murder you just to nick all your stuff. Which probably has some historical precedent somewhere. Yeah I suppose you could suck up to whatever regime is in power but it seems obvious to me that if you have any wealth then your interest would be more into cynically limiting how much power a regime has lest they get around to coming after you.
If it is about collectivizing power - to the point of essentially becoming a part of the regime - and not money then what would be the fucking point? Who wants to be in charge of some system slowly eating itself when your energy would be better spent just figuring ways to skim off wealth.
HillarysPenis ago
" If it is about collectivizing power - to the point of essentially becoming a part of the regime - and not money then what would be the fucking point? Who wants to be in charge of some system slowly eating itself when your energy would be better spent just figuring ways to skim off wealth."
That is what it's about. Some will argue that communism is basically Judaism put into modern political form. The Jews don't care about wealth. They print it. They want power. They want to rule over us. Communism is a more totalitarian form of government. It's a system of government that will give them more control over the people than current Western modes of government will permit.
Why let the West decline under a communist government?
Because Israel is their country. They want Israel to prosper and the West to decline. They don't care about the West. They basically just want to control a bunch of impoverished peasants. Poor people are easier to rule over.
RedditSuxBalls ago
Still not making much sense:
"They want power. They want to rule over us." Why, like seriously why?
Who the hell wants to rule over a bunch of peasants? All they're ever going to do is get unhappy with their lot and revolt. In fact they're arguably harder control because they actually have stuff to lose, so there is nothing holding them back. If you just wanted to run a failed state there are plenty of those in Africa already. There is literally no motivation for this by itself. If their interest is power and not money then their welcome to run the fucking show, 'cause you couldn't do a worse job, in these places. Surely the better thing to do is to cynically put yourself in a postilion where you're making massive amounts of money because you literally are the bank. And in such a situation you would what to be involved with a successful country due to the fact that there would be more money to skim. The last possible thing you would want is to have a revolution or a dictatorship that is going to potentially fuck with that arrangement. I would argue that this is what Judaism is about rather that any notions of having power just because. This notion that you want power just for the sake of having power just doesn't make sense.
Also, If they wanted the West to decline because of Israel then who is going to defend them from the billion plus Muslims who all want to see them wiped off the face of the earth?
HillarysPenis ago
"They want power. They want to rule over us." Why, like seriously why?
Human nature.
You're not intelligent enough to have this discussion with.
Why would people want to control other people? Like are you serious?
Have a good night.
And btw, Israel has the 4th most powerful military in the world. They can protect themselves.
Bye.
RedditSuxBalls ago
Hypothetically speaking: Would you go to work for free even if you're the boss and got to order people around? That would be fun for a bit but then after a while would anyone still continue to do this for free without having any benefit to themselves? Sure some might like having the feeling of authority or continue for some ideological reasons but after awhile most people will eventually want to get paid or otherwise use this position to advance their own agenda somehow. Added to this would be the responsibility to keep this shared delusion going as long as possible otherwise having to deal with the prospect of it falling apart with could potentially get you executed. Power isn't really a top down thing when you think about it but rather organic in nature. That is Caesar is only Caesar because everyone around him believes this to be so, and if he doesn't do his job well enough there are more than enough people willing to knife him in the back. What you have are corrupt institutions built upon nepotism and self interest with idiots looking to fuck each other over at the first opportunity, If you want to be racist then I suppose you could say that Jews simply excel in this environment.
Also Israel makes use of a lot of American equipment, controls a tiny area of land and has an infinitesimal population in comparison to the Arab world. While their military punches above their weight for sure the fact remains that if the US and Europe were to stop existing tomorrow then they would get wiped off the face of the earth in a heartbeat just through sheer weight of numbers. Due to being completely surrounded by enemies. And If you're arguing that they're able to protect themselves then you're in effect defeating your own argument because then they would have no interest in what would happen in other countries.
I'm thinking that you've just not actually sat down and thought this through.