I don't know if it was a tactical time weapon to avert MAD or the Texas Superconducting Super Collider that was cancelled in this timeline- but I'm confident that we are in the alternate timeline. How it happened, I don't know- but it did. The SSC was over 3 times more powerful than this timeline's LHC collider at CERN. LHC was able to find Higgs Bosons which give particles mass. I think in the other time the SSC was able to find whatever it is that gives space a time component and also the time anti-particle that annihilates time.
In any case, I don't know how it happened, but I know it did and somehow some information transferred to this time line. Specifically, for me knowledge of a scar that I never had until this week. I remember always having a scar on my right temple, but in this time I've ignored the memory because I've had a lipoma in that spot for years. However, this week I had the lipoma removed and now I'm developing the exact scar and accompanying nerve damage I always remember having. I remember it right on my face, but the growth has kept me distracted.
I think this may also be where the Mandela Effect comes from, because many of the changes people remember occurred around the time that the SSC was canceled and it's funding was redirected to the International Space Station and Space Cooperation with the Russians.
view the rest of the comments →
Tancred ago
How would you test your claim?
A simpler explanation for your confusion is just bad memory. Like the deja vu effect, where something recent got falsely stored in long term memory, making you think that what just happened also happened, exactly like that, a long time ago.
goatboy ago
Finish building the SSC and take it up past 18 TeV, but if I am right it might start producing time and anti-time particles.
Tancred ago
How would you know whether it produces these new particles?
What are their measurable properties?
goatboy ago
I have no idea. That information would have developed in a time stream and from 2 decades of observations and at energy levels that dont exist in this time.
Tancred ago
Ok so you have an untestable claim about supposed things which we know nothing about and your answer is that this information hasn't developed yet.
Do you see the issue with this?
goatboy ago
Untested and untestable aren't the same things.
Also, the phenomena that caused physicists to theorerize about tachyons and tachyon condensate need a better explanation. The data that created tachyon speculation are the next big physics mysteries after higgs bosons. The data that created that speculation needs a better explanation than faster than light or imaginary mass particles.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon
Tancred ago
You're just rationalizing at this point and you don't see the problem. I can't help you. Good luck.