That would be going way to far, so far as to destroy the establishment itself. It would be a "vindicated in death" sort of event, the type that people pay attention to.
No if anything trump is the "cia" candidate, he is the type of guy they would want in charge so that he would give them more power.
Now if that bomb where to go off in Philly...
But seriously it would take at least a month to smuggle in that type of a bomb.
Depending on who is funding the theoretical attack, a collapse of structure and hierarchy might be the goal. Could be by enemies or allies. Enemies was us to burn (especially trump, an apparent nationalist), and an ally might want a "phoenix from the ashes" controlled rise to power. Essentially this would be a controlled collapse to mask a coup. A seemingly organic revolution might be the only way to slide a coup by the military.
The second fits with some of the principles of the NWO theories; namely state police militarization, the continued harassment of the middle east (after isreal's 6 days war), emasculation of white males, dissolving of borders, immigrant quotas, ecct. Each of these either create a threat, or insure its successful deployment.
"Frenemy," if you want to get all grade-school. Treacherous, treasonous, conniving, conspiratorial, unfaithful, or perfidious, if you want to sound like a walking thesaurus. I think "double-agent" is probably the best descriptor though.
view the rest of the comments →
senpaithatignoresyou ago
And martyr trump?
That would be going way to far, so far as to destroy the establishment itself. It would be a "vindicated in death" sort of event, the type that people pay attention to.
No if anything trump is the "cia" candidate, he is the type of guy they would want in charge so that he would give them more power.
Now if that bomb where to go off in Philly... But seriously it would take at least a month to smuggle in that type of a bomb.
dildonkers ago
This.
Trump dies by Islamist hands? He's proven right about everything. His supporters will revolt and I doubt the military will go against them.
Sciency ago
Depending on who is funding the theoretical attack, a collapse of structure and hierarchy might be the goal. Could be by enemies or allies. Enemies was us to burn (especially trump, an apparent nationalist), and an ally might want a "phoenix from the ashes" controlled rise to power. Essentially this would be a controlled collapse to mask a coup. A seemingly organic revolution might be the only way to slide a coup by the military.
The second fits with some of the principles of the NWO theories; namely state police militarization, the continued harassment of the middle east (after isreal's 6 days war), emasculation of white males, dissolving of borders, immigrant quotas, ecct. Each of these either create a threat, or insure its successful deployment.
TreadCarefully ago
Is there a word for an ally who is an enemy of everything you stand for?
Sciency ago
"Frenemy," if you want to get all grade-school. Treacherous, treasonous, conniving, conspiratorial, unfaithful, or perfidious, if you want to sound like a walking thesaurus. I think "double-agent" is probably the best descriptor though.
TreadCarefully ago
I love the word perfidious. It sounds so, Sith.