No. You can't do one better unless you can answer my original question. Which really can't be done logically.
The reasoning used in the video you linked to is extremely flawed. The basic premise put forward is that because there is perspective to sunrays at twilight when viewed by a person, that this means that stars act in the same way and those in the South are moving similar to a mirror version of the North. For this theory to work we must also accept that stars are going around us like they are on some kind of a semi-globe.
Therefore I assume you may think you have answered my question - but what you have linked here does not make sense. As the moon moves around the flat Earth how could it change it's orientation? Are there two moons? Does the original moon disappear when it reaches the Southern hemisphere? Apparently there is no Southern hemisphere on a flat Earth so explain why there should be any difference at all.
I'll give you a clue; it's an impossible conundrum to answer. So unless you can provide me with some logical and verifiable explanation to answer my original question I remain with my belief that you are deluding yourself into believing a fallacy. A fallacy that was disproved centuries ago.
There is a point in the video (15:27) when the narrator correctly states 'that's a hard one to visualise', and this is very true. Do you know why it's true? Because it's impossible for this entire 'idea' to actually function.
view the rest of the comments →
Konran ago
No. You can't do one better unless you can answer my original question. Which really can't be done logically.
The reasoning used in the video you linked to is extremely flawed. The basic premise put forward is that because there is perspective to sunrays at twilight when viewed by a person, that this means that stars act in the same way and those in the South are moving similar to a mirror version of the North. For this theory to work we must also accept that stars are going around us like they are on some kind of a semi-globe.
Therefore I assume you may think you have answered my question - but what you have linked here does not make sense. As the moon moves around the flat Earth how could it change it's orientation? Are there two moons? Does the original moon disappear when it reaches the Southern hemisphere? Apparently there is no Southern hemisphere on a flat Earth so explain why there should be any difference at all.
I'll give you a clue; it's an impossible conundrum to answer. So unless you can provide me with some logical and verifiable explanation to answer my original question I remain with my belief that you are deluding yourself into believing a fallacy. A fallacy that was disproved centuries ago.
There is a point in the video (15:27) when the narrator correctly states 'that's a hard one to visualise', and this is very true. Do you know why it's true? Because it's impossible for this entire 'idea' to actually function.