It says the same lawsuit was brought up in California and thrown out by a judge last month. Not to mention the fact that it happened 20 years ago and conveniently shows up now in the legal system.
I clearly don't know whether this happened or not but this trial would just be people's words against other peoples words at this point, unless somehow evidence was saved from 20 years ago.
If it is simply to slander a politician it was well planned. Trump hung out with a guy who is already convicted of some sexual assault or something along those lines and now 20 years later the truth comes out about something from back then. They could even lean on his old "friend" to testify against him and bribe him with money and whatever else they have at their disposal. If 2-3 people say shit against him it suddenly becomes more credible and then even without evidence involved the media has a field day with it.
view the rest of the comments →
PM_me_your_mitts ago
It says the same lawsuit was brought up in California and thrown out by a judge last month. Not to mention the fact that it happened 20 years ago and conveniently shows up now in the legal system.
I clearly don't know whether this happened or not but this trial would just be people's words against other peoples words at this point, unless somehow evidence was saved from 20 years ago.
If it is simply to slander a politician it was well planned. Trump hung out with a guy who is already convicted of some sexual assault or something along those lines and now 20 years later the truth comes out about something from back then. They could even lean on his old "friend" to testify against him and bribe him with money and whatever else they have at their disposal. If 2-3 people say shit against him it suddenly becomes more credible and then even without evidence involved the media has a field day with it.