I'm not really sure where to post this, it's more of a thought or observation than anything. Remember the 60's and 70's? Bands like The Who, The Beatles, Buffalo Springfield and many others thought it was their responsibility as musical artists to give a voice for political messages.
Is it me, or is that completely gone now? I can only think of a handful of songs from the past couple of decades with much a message. During the Vietnam war, so many musicians wrote songs in protest. That didn't happen with the war in Iraq.
My thought is, that if you are good enough to be a music star, you have to play ball with the corporate execs and they probably all got together and decided to ban such music and not allow it. The musicians today just want to make money, for the most part of course.
But am I crazy, has this been discussed? It just seems odd that now, musicians don't use their voice to send messages to the world like they used to.
view the rest of the comments →
Sosacms ago
I felt like 90s had a lot of anger/unrest music then it's just gotten more and more happy go lucky until it's just songs about how fun their weekend was.
But is the music effecting the public or does the public effect the music?
Morpheus ago
Music affects the public.
440hz and sound activated DNA fragments.