You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Random101 ago

Being able to predict the future is an incredibly convincing method of knowing whether someone is telling the truth.

Sometimes people can predict the future because the have a full understanding of the initial conditions and the laws which govern possible outcomes. Sometimes they can predict the future because they've got insider information. In both of these cases there is no reason to trust these sources, even though they have the ability to provide useful information.

Chiken-lover_Hater ago

You've only come here since the storm started, so you should be aware that we have gained a lot of knowledge and followers in the recent past. Predicting that the terrorist was Bangladeshi - that is unheard of. Q is clearly an insider. It's still not fully decided that Q is 100% benevolent, but that's why we're encouraging skepticism.

Random101 ago

Sure. The White House has a history of leaking information and Trump likes social media so even without the predictions it's reasonable to think that someone like Q could exist. I haven't seen anything to make me think that Q is malicious or deceitful, but I'm wary of his "Trump is our saviour" line. Trump's America-first policy doesn't work well in a global context, he speaks of reciprocity but that doesn't work for a stateless people like the Palestinians.

Christosgnosis ago

Not our business to fix America's problems by only simultaneously solving all problems for all people everywhere. When someone is drowning they're not going to be saved by someone else that is drowning too

Random101 ago

Survival is basic. You've got to walk it back until you can collect enough parts of the puzzle to make sense of it.

https://ibb.co/gx9Ypb