The demographic progression of Equatorial Guinea suggest that they are far away from a "Darwin Award". Cognitive abilities obviously do not warrant a winning evolution strategy in all circumstances.
There was a great diary posted on a forum a while back of these two guys trying to drive across the Congo, also a low IQ country, in a specially equipped 4 wheel drive. Every single person they encountered who was not involved in the church asked them for a bribe.
A similar video showed a two truck convoy, and they got robbed and arrested constantly across africa by dark skinned negroids, the fuel was robbed from them by their OWN BLACK WORKERS they hired!!! Africa was 100% corrupt and low IQ and the video was to prove africa was an "OK place".
It is NOT at all an "OK place". It is a dystopian niggertopia shithole.
New Guinea isn't an African country nor is it filled with Africans. It's filled with people who are the same thing as Australian Aborigines. Melanesians is the term most people use.
Care to elaborate? I'm certainly open to the possibility that TPTB are lying to us about many of the diseases, but there was something that made a whole lot of people very ill.
And we lowered the medically established minimum IQ for retardation of 85 to 70-75 in 1992.
They are still below it.
The threshold I.Q. level for a diagnosis of mental retardation has been progressively lowered over the years, in part because of awareness of the damaging social prejudice suffered by those labeled "retarded." In 1959, the American Association on Mental Deficiency set 85 as the I.Q. below which a person was considered to be retarded.14 In 1992, the renamed American Association on Mental Retardation lowered the mental retardation "ceiling" to an I.Q. of 70-75,15 but many mental health specialists argue that people with I.Q.s of up to 80 may also have mental retardation. 16 Flexibility in the I.Q. standard is important because tests given at different times may show slight variations due to differences in the tests and because of testing error -- the standard error measurement on I.Q. tests is generally three to five points.
Implying that sage local Magumbu with his 85 IQ luckily showed up on testing day and prevented a vacuous rift opening in space time when tabulating the results.
birth canal width , which varies dramatically between the races, allows larger cranium.
Neanderthal DNA allows most current races to have larger birth canals.
The problem with birth canal shapein humans is a very severe DNA problem , becuuse to change the human skeleton, even a little bit, you need mutations on almost EVERY CHROMOSOME in unison. The skeleton in mammals is so stable from alterations, that all mammals have the same exact total number of bones, if female mammal. A mouse has the same number of bones as a blue whale or an elephant or giraffe. This amazing fact is one reason the birth canal is such a limiter on brain size. There should be countless science papers on racial differences of birth canals and racial IQs and "cranial volume".
The human in any race can just barely squeeze out most of the births, and many do not fit on exit.
A cursory web search shows that the number out bones varies widely in mammals.
Evolution does not proceed by mutation. It happens by some genetic variations having more offspring. This does not happen simultaneously in one person. It would happen in many different people. They would, on average, have slightly more descendants. Those descendants would interbreed, combining several large birth canal variations in the same person, which would help them to have even more descendants.
Look at the drastic skeletal variations in dogs. They were produced by a few thousand years of (human directed) evolution.
when bones fuse , like the many many bones in a skull, some people might undercount them, or not pay attention to the tiny ear bones, but a simple one to show is the neck. mammals have widely divergent necks but all have the same number of bones in a neck, and because they do not fuse, they do not get undercounted. other undercounted bones are rib bones that start as cartilage in newborns mammals but calcify eventually and sometimes remain undercounted in some species, but microscopic embryo comparisons show better similarity.
laypeople try hard to come up with examples to try and refute how most mammals skeletons are shockingly similar, and you do not get my point on why it is so hard to have a mutation to add an extra limb. to add an extra limb would require changes to MOST ALL CHROMOSOMES. Why? because the skeleton is so profoundly secure and protected by being coded across so many chromosomes for some odd reason. Its as if life automatically grows in the womb atop a scaffold of skeleton, automatically putting the layers onto the skeleton, and needing the skeleton to form in a secure way to rely upon it as a scaffold.
I am being pedantic and counting bones before they "fuse" into other shapes of bones merged into a multi-part "bone"
I would call the fused bone one bone. Evolution need not use a single mechanism for calcifying tissue. The fetal similarity does, however, inform us of what is going on behind the scenes.
because the skeleton is so profoundly secure and protected by being coded across so many chromosomes for some odd reason.
It is actually well understood, at least by the standards of genetics. The genes that create the body plan are ancient. Profoundly ancient. Ancient as in we inherit them from the common ancestor we share with insects. Ever wonder why scientists spend so much time dorking around with fruit flies? A few thousand bucks and some nuclear radiation gets them 50,000 mutated flies with many genes equivalent to ours. For example, they have fruit flies with legs where their antennae should be. Turns out a copy of the master gene for legs had ended up near the promoter gene for antennae.
Its as if life automatically grows in the womb atop a scaffold of skeleton, automatically putting the layers onto the skeleton, and needing the skeleton to form in a secure way to rely upon it as a scaffold.
It grows atop a scaffold of invisible Hox-related hormones and their receptors. Hormone gradients and receptor thresholds determine the size and shape. And that is why body plan is so evolutionarily stable. The Hox-related hormones determine much about body structure and organ location. Consider the number of vertebrae in the neck. There is probably a relay chain of hormones and receptors, one for each vertebra. To add a vertebra would require that both its hormone and receptor were duplicated, later diverged, and that all the non-bone tissues were sensitive to both. That is unlikely with the small population sizes and low evolutionary pressure faced today.
But not for all bones. Consider human polydactyly (extra fingers) from a dominant mutation. People with it are fully functional. It is presently being selected for in Mexico. Men with it are more confident that their children are not the result of sexual infidelity.
Brain folding of outer layers of brain, and going through puberty latest, allowing wider bell curve of IQ shape.
Also birth canal size is how far it can stretch before hitting BONE pelvis limits , not resting volume or resting shape!
the earlier you go through puberty, the more profoundly the two brain hemispheres are less "specialized".
asians go last, and have least "secondary sexual characteristics", then causians, then hispanics, then blacks. blacks go through puberty first. As do "jocks" in your high school memories. In medieval times and before, they castrated males to make them smarter to make them "scribes", and it worked for some (wider bell curve shape).
BRAIN FOLDING?
Many many "brain folding genes" exist, and other morphology brain genes. Mammals have some, primates have more, Hominids have more, and Caucasians and others that have Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA admixtures have even more IQ bestowing brain folding genes.
A "H.Sapiens sapiens" brain on a lab bench looks dramatically more wrinkled (furrowed) than a negro brain. The wrinkles increase surface area. The Negros lack this huge IQ boost because a pure bred african in africa has 0 percent (none) Neanderthal DNA, but instead they have DNA from an extinct talking ape called "H. heidelbergensis"
brain folding "wrinkles" increases surface area of outer most part of brain, and each major species jump in intelligence shows another gene that adds more wrinkles. mammals got some marsupials lack, primates got some other animals lack, apes got some more, neanderthals gave non negro humans more, and a few of the 1,000 identified high IQ genes add MORE WRINKLES.
you can find science papers, complex ones, identifying EACH of the few critical brain folding genes I metioned above.
ADOLESCENT BRAIN VOLUME (but birth too!)
Adolescent : African-descended people (Blacks) average cranial capacities of 1267 cm³, European-descended people (Whites) 1347 cm³, and East Asian-descended people (East Asians) 1364 cm³
Birth :
The races differ in average brain size and this shows up at birth. Rushton (1997) analyzed the enormous US data set known as the Collaborative Perinatal Project. It recorded head circumference measurements and IQ scores from 50,000 children followed from birth to age 7 (Broman, Nichols, Shaugnessy, & Kennedy, 1987). The results showed that at birth, 4 months, 1 year, and 7 years, the East Asian children in the study averaged larger cranial volumes than did the White children, who averaged larger cranial volumes than did the Black children. Within each race, the children with the larger head sizes had the higher IQ scores and by age 7, the East Asian children averaged an IQ of 110, White children an IQ of 102, and Black children an IQ of 90. Moreover, the East Asian children, who averaged the largest craniums, were the shortest in stature and the lightest in weight, whereas the Black children, who averaged the smallest craniums, were the tallest in stature and the heaviest in weight. Therefore, the race differences in brain size were not due to body size.
I mean true East Asians (chinese coastal cities, korea, japan, with two helpings of Neanderthal genes, from two mating events with Denisovians (neanderthal bearing genes) :
Modern asian humans (smart non-Thai asians) interbred with Denisovans TWICE in history :
2008 : N-234 : Racial Differences in Pelvic Anatomy by Magnetic Resonance Imaging : DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318169ce03:
White women have a wider pelvic inlet, wider outlet
C sections are allowing negroid hybrids, and shorter mothers, to bear living offspring with larger heads whom make more money and pass genes on , WE ARE EVOLVING LARGER HEADS in meritocracy based nations :
Thanks for the links, I'll be saving those. It's tragic to see how students in White countries are performing worse and worse in tests results and the institutions and politicians pretend that they can't seem to figure out the connection to the racial demographic shift. Right now the Kalergi plan seem to be working; the population in White countries are getting dumber and dumber.
DNA is well proven to be source of 80% of IQ based on mammoth research studies.
Important point to consider. Living conditions and diet can in extreme cases lower IQ test results ... they cannot raise them. The IQ under ideal environmental and social conditions -- for example, this test of South African university students -- is wholly conditioned by genetics.
What I mean by "active" IQ is that no one has a solid # as their IQ. Everyone falls into a range. If I eat a well balanced diet for a week, get however many hours of sleep my mind and body needs to thrive, and completely avoid stressors my IQ will be higher than had I done any of those things differently: garbage (((diet))), lalck of sleep OR too much sleep, be exposed to any number of stressors.
Posted automatically (#111120) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@TFS: Click here to suppress your anonymous crosslink notifications)
view the rest of the comments →
TFS ago
Yes. Scroll down to the bottom of the list for the African countries. Equatorial Guinea wins the Darwin Award with a smashing average IQ of 59!
https://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/average-iq-by-country/
TreeMan32 ago
sounds like poor education!
not
wolf_534 ago
The demographic progression of Equatorial Guinea suggest that they are far away from a "Darwin Award". Cognitive abilities obviously do not warrant a winning evolution strategy in all circumstances.
Olivefigs ago
Scary
curiouserdude ago
There was a great diary posted on a forum a while back of these two guys trying to drive across the Congo, also a low IQ country, in a specially equipped 4 wheel drive. Every single person they encountered who was not involved in the church asked them for a bribe.
zum ago
A similar video showed a two truck convoy, and they got robbed and arrested constantly across africa by dark skinned negroids, the fuel was robbed from them by their OWN BLACK WORKERS they hired!!! Africa was 100% corrupt and low IQ and the video was to prove africa was an "OK place".
It is NOT at all an "OK place". It is a dystopian niggertopia shithole.
MurkSquatch ago
New Guinea isn't an African country nor is it filled with Africans. It's filled with people who are the same thing as Australian Aborigines. Melanesians is the term most people use.
TFS ago
Yes, that is correct. I wrote Equatorial Guinea, that's in Africa. Remember where the Ebola outbreak was? They supposedly got it from bat-soup.
MPreg ago
Ebola is a hoax
TFS ago
Care to elaborate? I'm certainly open to the possibility that TPTB are lying to us about many of the diseases, but there was something that made a whole lot of people very ill.
MPreg ago
How do you know a whole lot of people were very ill? Cuz someone reported it?
TFS ago
Alright, what's your take on the situation then?
MPreg ago
Its a hoax disease to scare people. Fear mongering.
Ocelot ago
59...good God in heaven. And that's the AVERAGE.
Absolutely NOT human.
GrizzlyDark ago
Like Lord of the Flies there I'm sure. But more violent. And less intelligent.
GusStappo ago
And we lowered the medically established minimum IQ for retardation of 85 to 70-75 in 1992.
They are still below it.
The threshold I.Q. level for a diagnosis of mental retardation has been progressively lowered over the years, in part because of awareness of the damaging social prejudice suffered by those labeled "retarded." In 1959, the American Association on Mental Deficiency set 85 as the I.Q. below which a person was considered to be retarded.14 In 1992, the renamed American Association on Mental Retardation lowered the mental retardation "ceiling" to an I.Q. of 70-75,15 but many mental health specialists argue that people with I.Q.s of up to 80 may also have mental retardation. 16 Flexibility in the I.Q. standard is important because tests given at different times may show slight variations due to differences in the tests and because of testing error -- the standard error measurement on I.Q. tests is generally three to five points.
wolf_534 ago
An IQ 75 White person will appear handicapped, while an IQ 75 Black person will appear normal.
non_alcoholic_nignog ago
Loool this is so true. Running into a 70 IQ African you would think “just another nigger”
GrizzlyDark ago
kek. I want to see 10 75 iq whites and 10 75 iq blacks just to compare
burnthegoyimhaters ago
That would end in a fight if you put those two groups in a room. Guaranteed.
GrizzlyDark ago
https://imgflip.com/i/41ux7x
SpiritExpedition ago
Implying that sage local Magumbu with his 85 IQ luckily showed up on testing day and prevented a vacuous rift opening in space time when tabulating the results.
Leveraction ago
I said this on gateway pundit and got banned.
zum ago
True! and those are accurate and charitable and remeasured often by scientists.
DNA is well proven to be source of 80% of IQ based on mammoth research studies.
The two bombshell 80% DNA source of IQ studies ! :
2018 : 1,016 genes
paper = Genome-Wide Association Meta-Analysis In 269,867 Individuals Identifies New Genetic And Functional Links To Intelligence
Nature Genetics (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0152-6
Now 1,016 genes are proven correlated to IQ (many are brain , skull, or birth canal related, some might be merely (non-negroid) genes in general.
2018 : 538 genes
UK Biobank DNA yields 538 genes that are linked to intellectual abilities - genetic effects on intelligence and personality
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20180313/Large-number-of-genes-associated-with-intelligence-discovered.aspx
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-017-0005-1
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-017-0005-1
pop science description of the above :
538 genes that are thought to be linked to intelligence (by comparing 300,000 test subjects) :
http://www.frontlinegenomics.com/news/20419/using-dna-to-predict-intelligence/
SKIN COLOR proven related to IQ:
https://files.catbox.moe/eko2da.png
@anticlutch backed up over 40 videos on African low IQ to :
https://mega.nz/folder/vaYERCJB#_K0dREBS3X-MYoRZj-dE0Q
watch them and learn. YouTube, bitchute, and even archive.org keeps deleting these. So far only catbox never deleted science DNA videos on black IQ.
WATCH the videos! Save them :
https://files.catbox.moe/eko2da.png
The most accurately re-measured of all african countries are the low IQ ones, out of sheer amazement.
Equatorial Guinea is very very accurately average IQ of 59 with HALF its population lower than IQ 59 ! HALF!
european ago
How does birth canal factor ? Is it related to amounts of stress induced during birth?
zum ago
birth canal width , which varies dramatically between the races, allows larger cranium.
Neanderthal DNA allows most current races to have larger birth canals.
The problem with birth canal shapein humans is a very severe DNA problem , becuuse to change the human skeleton, even a little bit, you need mutations on almost EVERY CHROMOSOME in unison. The skeleton in mammals is so stable from alterations, that all mammals have the same exact total number of bones, if female mammal. A mouse has the same number of bones as a blue whale or an elephant or giraffe. This amazing fact is one reason the birth canal is such a limiter on brain size. There should be countless science papers on racial differences of birth canals and racial IQs and "cranial volume".
The human in any race can just barely squeeze out most of the births, and many do not fit on exit.
Commie_Meta ago
A cursory web search shows that the number out bones varies widely in mammals.
Evolution does not proceed by mutation. It happens by some genetic variations having more offspring. This does not happen simultaneously in one person. It would happen in many different people. They would, on average, have slightly more descendants. Those descendants would interbreed, combining several large birth canal variations in the same person, which would help them to have even more descendants.
Look at the drastic skeletal variations in dogs. They were produced by a few thousand years of (human directed) evolution.
zum ago
wrong
when bones fuse , like the many many bones in a skull, some people might undercount them, or not pay attention to the tiny ear bones, but a simple one to show is the neck. mammals have widely divergent necks but all have the same number of bones in a neck, and because they do not fuse, they do not get undercounted. other undercounted bones are rib bones that start as cartilage in newborns mammals but calcify eventually and sometimes remain undercounted in some species, but microscopic embryo comparisons show better similarity.
laypeople try hard to come up with examples to try and refute how most mammals skeletons are shockingly similar, and you do not get my point on why it is so hard to have a mutation to add an extra limb. to add an extra limb would require changes to MOST ALL CHROMOSOMES. Why? because the skeleton is so profoundly secure and protected by being coded across so many chromosomes for some odd reason. Its as if life automatically grows in the womb atop a scaffold of skeleton, automatically putting the layers onto the skeleton, and needing the skeleton to form in a secure way to rely upon it as a scaffold.
Commie_Meta ago
Thanks for the detailed and interesting reply.
I would call the fused bone one bone. Evolution need not use a single mechanism for calcifying tissue. The fetal similarity does, however, inform us of what is going on behind the scenes.
It is actually well understood, at least by the standards of genetics. The genes that create the body plan are ancient. Profoundly ancient. Ancient as in we inherit them from the common ancestor we share with insects. Ever wonder why scientists spend so much time dorking around with fruit flies? A few thousand bucks and some nuclear radiation gets them 50,000 mutated flies with many genes equivalent to ours. For example, they have fruit flies with legs where their antennae should be. Turns out a copy of the master gene for legs had ended up near the promoter gene for antennae.
Look up Hox genes.
It grows atop a scaffold of invisible Hox-related hormones and their receptors. Hormone gradients and receptor thresholds determine the size and shape. And that is why body plan is so evolutionarily stable. The Hox-related hormones determine much about body structure and organ location. Consider the number of vertebrae in the neck. There is probably a relay chain of hormones and receptors, one for each vertebra. To add a vertebra would require that both its hormone and receptor were duplicated, later diverged, and that all the non-bone tissues were sensitive to both. That is unlikely with the small population sizes and low evolutionary pressure faced today.
But not for all bones. Consider human polydactyly (extra fingers) from a dominant mutation. People with it are fully functional. It is presently being selected for in Mexico. Men with it are more confident that their children are not the result of sexual infidelity.
Olivefigs ago
Then how do Asians get to be the higher iq race despite a narrower birth canal as well as smaller head sizes at birth?
zum ago
Brain folding of outer layers of brain, and going through puberty latest, allowing wider bell curve of IQ shape.
Also birth canal size is how far it can stretch before hitting BONE pelvis limits , not resting volume or resting shape!
the earlier you go through puberty, the more profoundly the two brain hemispheres are less "specialized".
asians go last, and have least "secondary sexual characteristics", then causians, then hispanics, then blacks. blacks go through puberty first. As do "jocks" in your high school memories. In medieval times and before, they castrated males to make them smarter to make them "scribes", and it worked for some (wider bell curve shape).
BRAIN FOLDING?
Many many "brain folding genes" exist, and other morphology brain genes. Mammals have some, primates have more, Hominids have more, and Caucasians and others that have Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA admixtures have even more IQ bestowing brain folding genes.
A "H.Sapiens sapiens" brain on a lab bench looks dramatically more wrinkled (furrowed) than a negro brain. The wrinkles increase surface area. The Negros lack this huge IQ boost because a pure bred african in africa has 0 percent (none) Neanderthal DNA, but instead they have DNA from an extinct talking ape called "H. heidelbergensis"
brain folding "wrinkles" increases surface area of outer most part of brain, and each major species jump in intelligence shows another gene that adds more wrinkles. mammals got some marsupials lack, primates got some other animals lack, apes got some more, neanderthals gave non negro humans more, and a few of the 1,000 identified high IQ genes add MORE WRINKLES.
you can find science papers, complex ones, identifying EACH of the few critical brain folding genes I metioned above.
ADOLESCENT BRAIN VOLUME (but birth too!)
Adolescent : African-descended people (Blacks) average cranial capacities of 1267 cm³, European-descended people (Whites) 1347 cm³, and East Asian-descended people (East Asians) 1364 cm³
Birth :
https://menghublog.wordpress.com/2012/04/20/brain-size-iq-and-racial-group-differences-evidence-from-musculoskeletal-traits/
East Asian descent?
I mean true East Asians (chinese coastal cities, korea, japan, with two helpings of Neanderthal genes, from two mating events with Denisovians (neanderthal bearing genes) :
Modern asian humans (smart non-Thai asians) interbred with Denisovans TWICE in history :
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/03/180315140718.htm
2008 : N-234 : Racial Differences in Pelvic Anatomy by Magnetic Resonance Imaging : DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318169ce03:
C sections are allowing negroid hybrids, and shorter mothers, to bear living offspring with larger heads whom make more money and pass genes on , WE ARE EVOLVING LARGER HEADS in meritocracy based nations :
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-12-instances-c-sections-evolutionary.html
@Commie_Meta
Commie_Meta ago
Thanks too! This is a spectacular comment.
Olivefigs ago
Thanks for your detailed reply, I appreciate it. I learned a few new things and am saving your comment!
Commie_Meta ago
You and your facts! Begone!
Olivefigs ago
Lol but he did reply with a lot of info
anticlutch ago
http://archive.md/pLaAU
http://archive.md/WGcel
http://archive.md/VEs4q
http://archive.md/VEs4q
TFS ago
Thanks for the links, I'll be saving those. It's tragic to see how students in White countries are performing worse and worse in tests results and the institutions and politicians pretend that they can't seem to figure out the connection to the racial demographic shift. Right now the Kalergi plan seem to be working; the population in White countries are getting dumber and dumber.
Anarchy99 ago
That's because they are medically damaged. The parents are probably also medically damaged
ardvarcus ago
Important point to consider. Living conditions and diet can in extreme cases lower IQ test results ... they cannot raise them. The IQ under ideal environmental and social conditions -- for example, this test of South African university students -- is wholly conditioned by genetics.
anticlutch ago
Diet can't lower true IQ.
Diet can lower "active" IQ.
What I mean by "active" IQ is that no one has a solid # as their IQ. Everyone falls into a range. If I eat a well balanced diet for a week, get however many hours of sleep my mind and body needs to thrive, and completely avoid stressors my IQ will be higher than had I done any of those things differently: garbage (((diet))), lalck of sleep OR too much sleep, be exposed to any number of stressors.
zum ago
lack of iodized salt robs a nation of 2.5 IQ points, if they shun iodized salt for historic cultural reasons.
non iodized salt is banned in 49 out of top 50 nations for the past 18 years.
but thats one example of what you stated.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this anonymous v/ScienceAnon comment.
Posted automatically (#111120) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@TFS: Click here to suppress your anonymous crosslink notifications)