I have seen various pictures of Srayzie here on Voat. I have seen various pictures of GothamGirl on Voat.
Crensch stated if it was in public domain, it’s fair game. Srayzie is a public figure.
TrigglyPuff gets banned over a parody sub.
I’m starting to notice a pattern. It’s called #paytriotPussyPass.
Or is it, create a bunch of alts which coincidentally happen to know new registrations are open before a site wide notice is made, then post the same shit as the other side, but because it’s a crappy alt, you don’t get in trouble.
Why is it ok that mud slinging on crappy alts isn’t punished and whack a mole game played, while taking out a solid main is?
Or are we gonna play the “muh sub, muh rules” which can easily mean that my sub rules override Voat rules within legal parameters? Crensch and his scorched earth policy is not what Voat was about.
Please, clarify the rules for all. (We won’t ask if you were one of the multiple people she sent for pics to.)
view the rest of the comments →
19472788? ago
So this ( https://voat.co/v/fatpeoplehate/3303044/19428491 ) I would think is clearly a dox - username and pic combined In one image. Also this ( https://voat.co/v/fatpeoplehate/3302428/19427533 ) where the user in the pic is hinted at in title and then named by OP in comments.
But this ( https://voat.co/v/8chan/3296785/19464765 ) - just a dump of photos without naming or linking to the doxees voat account still seems like doing while technically may not be, "it's just a series of images of a random woman posted for no reason" but if that was me I would want it gone. If someone has seen that woman in other pictures someone else or the same person has posted in connection with that woman's voat username and then that woman in the pictures without connection is kinda being doxxed again, no?
@PuttItOut I will just report when it feels wrong but clarity would be nice so I don't flood your report inbox.