They're jumping through mental hoops with the ruling.
The way I understand it, it's not what was said that was illegal, but the fact that it was said with "divisive intent," or some shit.
Basically, you're not allowed to say things that hurt people's feelings or things that might make people not like a shitty religion, and somehow that restriction does not infringe on your freedom of speech or expression.
In other words, it's the arbitrary rule of hurt feelings that governs now. As if that's anything new in Eurabia.
Like in germany you can smoke all the weed you want, you just not allowed to posses, produce, buy, sell store, im- or export it, because you know prohibiting you from smoking it would be infringement of your rights to individualism/free expression.
view the rest of the comments →
Hayashimo ago
They're jumping through mental hoops with the ruling.
The way I understand it, it's not what was said that was illegal, but the fact that it was said with "divisive intent," or some shit.
Basically, you're not allowed to say things that hurt people's feelings or things that might make people not like a shitty religion, and somehow that restriction does not infringe on your freedom of speech or expression.
In other words, it's the arbitrary rule of hurt feelings that governs now. As if that's anything new in Eurabia.
HeavyBrain ago
Its not just the speech.
Like in germany you can smoke all the weed you want, you just not allowed to posses, produce, buy, sell store, im- or export it, because you know prohibiting you from smoking it would be infringement of your rights to individualism/free expression.