They're jumping through mental hoops with the ruling.
The way I understand it, it's not what was said that was illegal, but the fact that it was said with "divisive intent," or some shit.
Basically, you're not allowed to say things that hurt people's feelings or things that might make people not like a shitty religion, and somehow that restriction does not infringe on your freedom of speech or expression.
In other words, it's the arbitrary rule of hurt feelings that governs now. As if that's anything new in Eurabia.
view the rest of the comments →
Hayashimo ago
They're jumping through mental hoops with the ruling.
The way I understand it, it's not what was said that was illegal, but the fact that it was said with "divisive intent," or some shit.
Basically, you're not allowed to say things that hurt people's feelings or things that might make people not like a shitty religion, and somehow that restriction does not infringe on your freedom of speech or expression.
In other words, it's the arbitrary rule of hurt feelings that governs now. As if that's anything new in Eurabia.
Pwning4Ever ago
It's intense mental gymnastics, go to Europe and say Jesus was insane and married a whore. The European fuckers won't pay you any mind.
PapShamir ago
Right. It's relative to an implicit group threat.