A few states have recently tried limiting availability or number of Planned Parenthood centers. A challenge to such efforts could make it up through the courts.
I think they are talking about "surgically excising" certain parts of the ruling. There was recent discussion that from Susan Collins, right? Roe V Wade included elements that made human trafficking easier - moving minors across borders, or so I read. It had a nefarious purpose that those of us (recovering Democrats) didn't see. I also see that the next nominee to be cued up is "unapologetically pro-life" - so THAT will be interesting.
Sorry. I was thinking with my old liberal democrat mindset. What I mean is that at the top of the swamp - they don't care about fetuses at any age - they care about trafficking human beings to make money off of them. Through fetal tissue in research or cosmetics or food, etc. Supplying the pedophile elite. THAT is a little bit more nefarious than a young woman who found herself pregnant and needs a legal protection to retain her right to do with it what she wants. Its going to remain a complex issue. But it needs to be included in the overall dark swamp of human slavery, trafficking, and murder.
view the rest of the comments →
SukkhaMadiqqa ago
A few states have recently tried limiting availability or number of Planned Parenthood centers. A challenge to such efforts could make it up through the courts.
middle_path ago
I get that, but the supreme Court (correct me if I'm wrong) can't just undo previous rulings.
SusiAngelArtist ago
I think they are talking about "surgically excising" certain parts of the ruling. There was recent discussion that from Susan Collins, right? Roe V Wade included elements that made human trafficking easier - moving minors across borders, or so I read. It had a nefarious purpose that those of us (recovering Democrats) didn't see. I also see that the next nominee to be cued up is "unapologetically pro-life" - so THAT will be interesting.
laserpewpewpewpew ago
Wait baby murdering had a nefarious consequence? Hold the phone
SusiAngelArtist ago
Sorry. I was thinking with my old liberal democrat mindset. What I mean is that at the top of the swamp - they don't care about fetuses at any age - they care about trafficking human beings to make money off of them. Through fetal tissue in research or cosmetics or food, etc. Supplying the pedophile elite. THAT is a little bit more nefarious than a young woman who found herself pregnant and needs a legal protection to retain her right to do with it what she wants. Its going to remain a complex issue. But it needs to be included in the overall dark swamp of human slavery, trafficking, and murder.