You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

16443685? ago

Something else. My enemies can't understand how I can so perfectly know their rhetoric, know how they think, and not be one of them. They just assume that for me to know them so fucking well, that I have to believe as they do. They imagine fascists are just ignorant, stupid, poor, idiots and that is why they believe the things they do. They can't imagine that in actual fact it is a worldview so superior, so advanced, that it in fact addresses every failing in every other ideology. Fascism IS the final answer and the ONLY answer that anyone who studies everything out there will inevitably conclude is right. Thus, every other ideology requires censorship to exist, as it can only exist in a bubble. Fascism is the light, it is the natural order of things, it is the truth. Fascism does not require a bubble. Fascism can open its doors to everyone (8/pol and /new/) and take on everybody, and in the end, the enemy leaves of his own accord. There's a reason that ANY place of discussion where actual freespeech is allowed INEVITABLY becomes fascist. Fascism wins the debate every time. Fascism has the facts behind it. It stands as a bright torch against which all lies dissipate and shrink back.

16515322? ago

Fascism absolutely requires a scapegoat in order to blame everything on. Does not work otherwise. Study the scapegoat mechanism, or mimetic theory, to understand why there is necessarily a better system than fascism.

16713655? ago

>>12746904

>>12748149

Neither. Simply an anon who understand that fascism requires a scapegoat, it's a core feature, related to its need to feel victimized and therefore needing someone to blame. Pretty simple, not the only one who understands this. For example:

https://www.livescience.com/57622-fascism.html

Paxton, author of several books, including "The Anatomy of Fascism" (Vintage, 2005), said fascism is based more on feelings than philosophical ideas. In his 1988 essay "The Five Stages of Fascism," published in 1998 in the Journal of Modern History, he defined seven feelings that act as "mobilizing passions" for fascist regimes. They are:

  1. The primacy of the group. Supporting the group feels more important than maintaining either individual or universal rights.

  2. Believing that one's group is a victim. This justifies any behavior against the group's enemies.

  3. The belief that individualism and liberalism enable dangerous decadence and have a negative effect on the group.

  4. A strong sense of community or brotherhood. This brotherhood's "unity and purity are forged by common conviction, if possible, or by exclusionary violence if necessary."

  5. Individual self-esteem is tied up in the grandeur of the group. Paxton called this an "enhanced sense of identity and belonging."

  6. Extreme support of a "natural" leader, who is always male. This results in one man taking on the role of national savior.

  7. "The beauty of violence and of will, when they are devoted to the group's success in a Darwinian struggle," Paxton wrote. The idea of a naturally superior group or, especially in Hitler's case, biological racism, fits into a fascist interpretation of Darwinism.

Once in power, "fascist dictatorships suppressed individual liberties, imprisoned opponents, forbade strikes, authorized unlimited police power in the name of national unity and revival, and committed military aggression," Paxton wrote.

Try to keep up.

16713661? ago

>>12746748

Still the most kiked up posts of 2019 ATM. Sasuga.

17508009? ago

is it?

anon is quoting professor Girard. you are uninformed, this has absolutely nothing to do with kikes, unless it's you throwing pilpul. learn.

16713659? ago

Once in power, communist dictatorships suppressed individual liberties, imprisoned opponents, forbade strikes, authorized unlimited police power in the name of national unity and revival, and committed military aggression

16713657? ago

Orwell had hilariously good insight as to why it can be hard to describe fascism.

"But Fascism is also a political and economic system. Why, then, cannot we have a clear and generally accepted definition of it? Alas! we shall not get one — not yet, anyway. To say why would take too long, but basically it is because it is impossible to define Fascism satisfactorily without making admissions which neither the Fascists themselves, nor the Conservatives, nor Socialists of any colour, are willing to make. All one can do for the moment is to use the word with a certain amount of circumspection and not, as is usually done, degrade it to the level of a swearword."

From: George Orwell, "What is Fascism?", 1944

http:// www.orwell.ru/library/articles/As_I_Please/english/efasc