Let's give some advice to ecelebs, who want to do their part for the movement, but aren't willing to put their face to their beliefs?
How do they make sure to not accidently reveal their powerlevel?
Should they make subtle references?
What should be the limit in terms of politics they can talk about?
How do they make sure to still be honest with themselves and not have a constant mental self-censorship blockade in them, which will surely also affect their popularity and enjoyment for the viewers?
How should they handle more private correspondence with other people? Be more open about themselves?
What if it's very private like a gf?
Would it be too risky to meet other people that are Nationalists? Like people in a right-wing political party/IB/etc?
How do they make sure to not cuck out? Would saying that they aren't racist already be cucking, because there is a difference between public policy and how you see other individuals?
TL;DR
How do ecelebs not cuck out/accidently sperg out, but still do their part to help the movement?
PS:
fucking cuck, just reveal your face and talk about what you honestly believe
-
This would be a crime in many countries
-
I already made a thread about this and the majority told me, that the prefer the covert approach
OP - https://8ch.net/pol/res/12683203.html
view the rest of the comments →
16164709? ago
If you want to do some real damage but you think tackling anything political head in is too risky, reveal your true power level but only regarding topics outside of the purview of the mainstream narrative. There are literally a dozen different topics you can speak about openly with your audience that will result in your message gaining their rapt attention.
If you're a well-read Renaissance Man of /pol/, you can approach topics like the modern American lifestyle, from health and nutrition, to the cheap, built to decay cardboard apartment developments and the way they atomize and impoverish us. Literally every white man, and most white women, with an IQ above room temperature can relate to your points ripped straight off of /pol/ and they will engage and crave more because no one in the mainstream can risk an honest discussion ob things like this.
To quote the prophetic speech from the movie Network:
The difference between real life and that movie is there is no mainstream personality willing to honestly address the fact that everything is fucked. They can't address these issues because if people begin to wake up en masse, the entire apparatus keeping them in their comfy seat behind their fancy newsroom set (or their bloated editor's paycheck, or their role on their hit TV show, etc) will collapse and the walls will fall in around them. So be the person who starts waking others up.
Everyone who recognizes that something is wrong with this modern world is trying to piece together what it is that makes it this way and why it is getting worse. Find a topic where the mainstream narrative refusss to offer a piece to that puzzle and then be the one to give it to your audience. They want that piece of the puzzle and as long as you stay away from running into a topic with psychological brick walls built around it (say, trying to directly address race realism to the audience of a gaming Youtube channel), you will have your audience demanding more pieces, hopefully igniting the flame of curiosity within them to pursue completion of the puzzle on their own.
16166369? ago
(Continued)
Everyone here who truly believes in securing the existence of our people and a future for white children need to understand this concept. What made /pol/ powerful was its ability to discuss practically any topic under the sun and uncover some fundamental truth about it that could never be discussed in the mainstream, but nevertheless rang true to everyone who came upon it.
(((They))) have spent the past 4 years trying to box us all into a neat little cornee where we are only able to discuss a handful of concepts without us either collapsing into a back and forth online flame war between ourselves (ask yourself this, why does every interesting thread devolve into 2-4 people calling each other shills for 30+ posts each?) or spilling our sphagetti everywhere in the real world. Reject their oppression and find at least topic you are willing to master in terms of yout ability to teach to others as well successfully argue for it in a debate setting. You must know how to passionately deliver your message and also defend it against (((those))) who will try to discredit you in front of your audience with pilpul and other logic traps.
All that being said, here is an example of an easy tooic that is highly approachable for any normie: environmentalism. EcoFascism has been a staple of /pol/ culture since the very beginning so you should all be familiar with some of its key tenets such as:
There are obviously a lot of details and supporting arguments I've leff unadressed in those points as well as dozens of better arguments I don't have time to come up with right now but you get my point. We can subvert their programming simply by approaching issues that everyone lives with day to day from an angle of approach they are unable to cover. We can all do this on a variety of topics but all I'm asking you to do is master one. Once you've broken through one piece of the narrative, the right kind of people will see there's more missing pieces to the puzzle and begin putting it togwther themselves.
Personally, all it took for me was the issue of a complete degeneration of relations between the sexes. It seemed like the ways in which young men and women interacted in pursuit of fulfilling our natural pairing instinct completely broke overnight in 2012 or so. I figured out somsthing was 'wrong' all on my own but it took the fallout from GamerGate for that first puzzle piece, that there were powerful people actively trying to influence the behavior of young men and women and that they apparently saw this degenracy as desirable, for me to start asking more questions searching for more answers… and now I'm here. (Puzzle piece #2 was discovered upon realizing they desired to influence people to degenracy more than rhey desired artistic merit or even profit, the answer lay on who they targeted and (((who))) was doing the targeting).
16172306? ago
That's Cass Sunstein's legacy, as his team did the same thing on Usenet in the 90's pretty much destroying it, so that Bubba and Shillary could maintain an iron grip on the narrative.
His strategy was pretty much sew FUD and fuck up the S/N ratio; it's probably because there are veterans of that like me and others who see it and expect it and know how to mitigate it who really scares them. Also, we have anonymity.
16172317? ago
It’s unfortunate how effective this method is and how hard it is to counteract. I believe I instinctively skim past the derailment posts but what’s left of the conversation after those who earnestly engage and those who simply tap out can be slim.