You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI ago

What the fuck is up with that? Free speech? Apparently Not.

Look at their mod log, it is a pro-censorship subverse. You must be approved to post there because it makes censorship easier when you just set the default for everybody to "censored". If you value free speech then you should block v/greatawakening and use other qtard subs like v/theawakening or v/qrv.

Also, please keep the qtard posts to those ghettos

Joe_McCarthy ago

In my observation there has been a good bit of deliberate disruption of that sub. People attacking it with porn, off topic submissions, etc. If that sort of thing happens enough it is predictable that submissions would be set to mod approval. There are a lot of trolls on Voat. There are also a lot of people that don't like QAnon a/o @Crensch. And in essence some are trying to cause trouble.

There is probably more to it than that. But there most definitely is that.

WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI ago

I don't know why you would defend censorship. There's no excuse for it. Furthermore, censorship invites those sorts of disruptions. Your post sounds like you assume it's the non-qtards that disrupt that sub, but why would you assume qtards would tolerate being censored? People on /qrv/ hate /greatawakening/ with a passion. One is the 8chan crowd and the other is reddit hugbox crowd.

It's also stupid to assume that the censor deals out censorship fairly and dispassionately. Nothing breeds resentment within a community as strongly as censorship does, and the censors always end up trampling on their own community.

Joe_McCarthy ago

@Crensch is not the most rational person I've met - so I'm sure some of his actions are excessive. But I also run a sub myself and know that sometimes there is a need for 'censorship'. You seem to be ignoring, or don't care about, the fact that we have a lot of, shall we say, psychos on Voat. They come in, they hurl insults, they deliberately post crap to disrupt the sub. You mentioned QRV. That place is continually plastered with tranny porn. No one wants to see that shit.

So the upshot is that if sub restrictions are put in place - there is probably some reasonable reasoning for it being placed there.

WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI ago

You mentioned QRV. That place is continually plastered with tranny porn.

I have qrv blocked but sometimes I stop over there to see what they're talking about. When I visit I sort by "hot" and have never seen tranny porn. If people have been posting it there then that must mean that /qrv/ is an example of things working correctly by letting the community use upvotes and downvotes as quality control.

Joe_McCarthy ago

I'm not going to spend all day digging around looking for tranny shit from QRV - but here are a couple of the threads:

https://voat.co/v/QRV/3698240

https://voat.co/v/QRV/3690978

It all gets heavily downvoted. But in that sub downvotes have no effect on SCP and CCP and are otherwise irrelevant as it is an anon sub. There's no 'censorship' there - so some jagoff disrupts the place with that stuff.

WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI ago

The main purpose of upvotes and downvotes is quality control. Punishing the person who posted it by taking their scp/ccp away was just a side effect of making low quality posts, and doesn't really even matter anymore now that the scp/ccp thresholds for new posts are gone.

Joe_McCarthy ago

Are you saying having negative CCP no longer limits how much one can post?

In any event the voting system is basically irrelevant in QRV because it has no impact on thread visibility as it's an anonymous sub.

WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI ago

It certainly isn't stopping the spammers like it did 9 months ago