but I guess you know more about Twitter & "dynamic" images than the developers making APIs for twitter. LOL.. But I digress, he's lying too - right? Only you are to be believed.
OK Karen - So prove me wrong, go make a twitter post RIGHT NOW with a dynamically changing image/validator (not a GIF or vid). Make a short unedited desktop video showing the dynamic images changing in real time. Use a clock website for the card link so we see it changing. It must be verifiable so post twitter & video link here.
If you're right, it should be easy to do and test. It's not even a lot of work since the validator is doing most of the work for you. I'll wait. Easy Peasy, right? I mean, if you get it working - we're millionaires after selling it to twatter.
You can keep claiming that all you want, but it's wrong.
Again, as I posted in the previous post - prove it, go create a dynamic image/tag using twatter validator. You can't. Do you understand why yet?
If I'm wrong, PUBLICLY PROVE ME WRONG with a short video. If you really are in "business" as you claim, it should literally take you less than 3 minutes to do this and a few mins to upload. I mean, it's dynamic, right? You shouldn't have to do anything, RIGHT? So, here I am again calling your BULLSHIT out.
This is why you guys keep losing, you make stuff up and hope the general population believes you. Your entire theory revolves around lies. You keep repeating the same mantra over and over again. "I'm a expert" , "I would know", "I work in this industry, I know", "Don't be retarded", "Believe me", "My friend who is an expert, wrote this", "Al Gore created the internet and told me this is true", etc..
But if it's so simple and easy and you're such an expert - POST PROOF. I'm calling you out dude. Post proof. It's that fucking simple. But you CAN'T and we both know why.
Where is your example chief? I didn't see a link where you tested and verified it. I'm still waiting here.
Why can't you just prove it as I've requested two times. What is the problem? Why is it so hard to provide proof to show your statements are accurate. Why do you just keep writing me back instead of just proving it.
I mean, you said you're an expert in the industry, right? It's so easy to do, right? You're 100% sure Q is wrong, right? WHY CAN'T YOU PROVIDE PROOF?
Post proof. Otherwise, you're just flat out lying. You people make me laugh. You have no honor, no integrity. You lie and mislead to get what you want. I have no idea how you look at yourself in the mirror. No wonder so many liberal men today are cucks.
Interesting that you released it as a bunch of jpegs instead of a video. The reason I asked for a VIDEO was so it was one contiguous shot where we could see if you changed something in between.
Instead, you released a bunch of static images but how can we know if you changed something between screenshots?
That's like trying to say: "I know the winning lottery numbers" and then showing a piece of paper after the results are already out with the numbers on it. Why do you think I asked for A VIDEO.
PS. You can use VLC to record a clip and post it. It's free and takes like 2 seconds. I'm sure you'll figure it out. You can record the clip faster than taking the 10 screenshots you sent out.
i posted the archive links. damn man. why not just test it out yourself? takes about 15 minutes. make a bunk site on a bunk site builder, set the og tag, post a tweet, go through the steps i laid out.
Q was saying something totally different and folks went off the rails. OR Q misstepped and didn't think it was necessary to clarify. either way, i'm over it.
view the rest of the comments →
Meez ago
Well that would be great and all, except you're completely wrong.
Read about it here:
https://mobile.twitter.com/TruthandArtTV1/status/1269461735037001728
PS. and next time do a bit of FUCKING research before opening your trap, uneducated shill.
telleveryoneyouknow ago
except that dude is wrong you dumb motherfucker. the images load dynamically. i would know.
Meez ago
Liar. I actually do work in the field.
Perhaps you missed devs COMMENTs that the tags are static once posted.
https://archive.is/Jd2IA#selection-1493.129-1493.221
but I guess you know more about Twitter & "dynamic" images than the developers making APIs for twitter. LOL.. But I digress, he's lying too - right? Only you are to be believed.
OK Karen - So prove me wrong, go make a twitter post RIGHT NOW with a dynamically changing image/validator (not a GIF or vid). Make a short unedited desktop video showing the dynamic images changing in real time. Use a clock website for the card link so we see it changing. It must be verifiable so post twitter & video link here.
If you're right, it should be easy to do and test. It's not even a lot of work since the validator is doing most of the work for you. I'll wait. Easy Peasy, right? I mean, if you get it working - we're millionaires after selling it to twatter.
So let's see the proof, Mr. "I would know".
telleveryoneyouknow ago
Don’t be retarded. Someone used the validator to update the images across the site AFTER GF died. Not before. https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1269461234400792578.html
Meez ago
You can keep claiming that all you want, but it's wrong.
Again, as I posted in the previous post - prove it, go create a dynamic image/tag using twatter validator. You can't. Do you understand why yet?
If I'm wrong, PUBLICLY PROVE ME WRONG with a short video. If you really are in "business" as you claim, it should literally take you less than 3 minutes to do this and a few mins to upload. I mean, it's dynamic, right? You shouldn't have to do anything, RIGHT? So, here I am again calling your BULLSHIT out.
This is why you guys keep losing, you make stuff up and hope the general population believes you. Your entire theory revolves around lies. You keep repeating the same mantra over and over again. "I'm a expert" , "I would know", "I work in this industry, I know", "Don't be retarded", "Believe me", "My friend who is an expert, wrote this", "Al Gore created the internet and told me this is true", etc..
But if it's so simple and easy and you're such an expert - POST PROOF. I'm calling you out dude. Post proof. It's that fucking simple. But you CAN'T and we both know why.
telleveryoneyouknow ago
Image is set by meta open graph tag
Way back machine open graph tag is set to the correct image (Obama’s commencement)
Current open graph tag is new GF image
Validator helps cache bust the rest of the cards
What is the problem?
Meez ago
Where is your example chief? I didn't see a link where you tested and verified it. I'm still waiting here.
Why can't you just prove it as I've requested two times. What is the problem? Why is it so hard to provide proof to show your statements are accurate. Why do you just keep writing me back instead of just proving it.
I mean, you said you're an expert in the industry, right? It's so easy to do, right? You're 100% sure Q is wrong, right? WHY CAN'T YOU PROVIDE PROOF?
Post proof. Otherwise, you're just flat out lying. You people make me laugh. You have no honor, no integrity. You lie and mislead to get what you want. I have no idea how you look at yourself in the mirror. No wonder so many liberal men today are cucks.
telleveryoneyouknow ago
sad i even had to go through this exercise at all but non technical people are assuming incorrectly
here's my example in more detail: https://voat.co/v/QRV/3862721
Meez ago
Interesting that you released it as a bunch of jpegs instead of a video. The reason I asked for a VIDEO was so it was one contiguous shot where we could see if you changed something in between.
Instead, you released a bunch of static images but how can we know if you changed something between screenshots?
That's like trying to say: "I know the winning lottery numbers" and then showing a piece of paper after the results are already out with the numbers on it. Why do you think I asked for A VIDEO.
PS. You can use VLC to record a clip and post it. It's free and takes like 2 seconds. I'm sure you'll figure it out. You can record the clip faster than taking the 10 screenshots you sent out.
telleveryoneyouknow ago
i posted the archive links. damn man. why not just test it out yourself? takes about 15 minutes. make a bunk site on a bunk site builder, set the og tag, post a tweet, go through the steps i laid out.
Q was saying something totally different and folks went off the rails. OR Q misstepped and didn't think it was necessary to clarify. either way, i'm over it.