http : // childprotectionresource.online/the-nspcc-and-child-protection-what-i-learned-this-month-about-speaking-up/
http : // archive.today/EsjsO
"(as an interesting aside I found myself subject to a recent actual blackmail attempt by the pro-paedophile organisation Prostasia after querying why they had a man involved in their organisation who had been arrested in 2012 for sexual contact with a child under 13."
NSPCC. James Makings. Munroe Bergdorf. Prostasia. Bad news for children
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
@Piscina did a post on this incident two weeks ago: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3275351
WeirdlyEerie ago
Hi V. That link doesn't mention Prostasia blackmailing Philmore. Prostasia needs more eyes, it is replete with convicted offenders, age play, child sex dolls, etc and it asked for donations in the wake of the exposure of the NSPCC via Munroe and the rubberpup who hired him, Makings.
Perhaps you are correct rw: Philmore's main occupation, "family barrister ", but she operates her blog page I linked, also queried bonafide journos regarding who wipp pitch, how will pitch, and which publications will publish this story. Perhaps "muckraker" will suffice for the nitpicking? Thx
Also, I attempted to post the links unbroken, but was given a message that my link(s) came from a banned domain. So I did my lo tech thang. Thanks!
Vindicator ago
Okay. No problem about the links if you got the error. I noticed one was "http" instead of "https".
WeirdlyEerie ago
I am so lqme i cannot re CV kon whats the diff with the https minus the s. Argh, i am the dumb. But i do appreciate the others like @shewhomustbeobeyed for the help with archuving etc
Vindicator ago
The "s" means "secure". It has to do with certificates that allow your browser to verify it isn't a phishing spoof site. Lots of places set up their firewall to prevent domains without it. That's about as much as I know about the topic. :-)
WeirdlyEerie ago
Thanks, appreciate your hard work
Vindicator ago
Right back at ya, WE