"Sallyport Global fired two of its investigators after they uncovered evidence of the trafficking as well as alcohol smuggling and major security violations at Balad Air Base."
WASHINGTON (AP) — A congressional investigative panel is demanding documents and testimony from an embattled U.S. defense contractor accused of failing to promptly disclose human trafficking on a base in Iraq.
An investigation by The Associated Press this month found that Sallyport Global fired two of its investigators after they uncovered evidence of the trafficking as well as alcohol smuggling and major security violations at Balad Air Base.
In a letter to Sallyport's Chief Executive Officer, Victor Esposito, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform ordered Sallyport to turn over an extensive list of documents and to make company representatives available to answer questions before June 9. The letter signed by the committee's chairman, Jason Chaffetz, a Republican, and top Democrat, Elijah Cummings, cited the AP's reporting.
"The allegations include prostitution, alcohol smuggling, timesheet fraud, concealment from Department of Defense auditors, and retaliation against employees whose duty it was to investigate these allegations," the letter says.
Sallyport Global Holdings was paid nearly $700 million in federal contracts to secure Balad Air Base, home to a squadron of F-16 fighter jets as part of the U.S.-led coalition against the Islamic State group.
In a statement, Sallyport Chief Operating Officer Matt Stuckart said the company looked forward to speaking to the panel.
"Sallyport takes any suggestion of wrongdoing at Balad Air Force Base in Iraq very seriously and strongly disputes the claims made by two former employees," said Matt Stuckart, Chief Operating Officer. "Since taking over operations January 2014, Sallyport has helped turn Balad Air Base into an instrumental part of the fight against ISIS."
In their letter, the lawmakers wrote, "Protecting American troops and facilities abroad is a solemn responsibility." They then raised concerns about the fired investigators' charge that the company shut down their investigations.
"Making matters worse, according to the report, Sallyport management short-circuited internal investigations and fired the employees responsible for them when they requested to interview Sallyport management suspected of wrongdoing," they wrote.
After the AP's report, the company denied the allegation that company managers had shut down an investigation into alcohol smuggling and human trafficking. They later acknowledged that after learning that the original probe had been stopped, lawyers had asked for a second investigation into new reports of prostitution on the base.
According to the investigators' original report in February 2016, four Ethiopian women who were suspected of working at a hotel in Baghdad as prostitutes moved to the base after customers at the hotel complained about contracting sexually transmitted diseases. Those customers included Sallyport employees, the investigators said.
The House panel is also scrutinizing allegations raised in another AP investigation that contractors have reported fraudulent data in a key military program to counter IS propaganda online.
Based in Reston, Virginia, Sallyport was founded in 2003 to work in Iraq on reconstruction, and has since expanded its operations globally.
Hinnant contributed from Paris. Follow Butler on Twitter at https://twitter.com/desmondbutler and Hinnant at https://twitter.com/lhinnant .
Online: Read documents about Sallyport's activities in Iraq at http://apne.ws/2p87fqZ .
view the rest of the comments →
think- ago
@EffYouJohnPodesta: Please review rule 1 before doing new posts.
I will flair the post '24 hours Grace' per Rule 1, so that you'll have time to research whether the prostitutes were underage.
Pizzagate is about investigating elite pedophilia, not human trafficking of adults.
Thank you.
Also, I will issue a formal ban warning now, due to the high numbers of posts we had to flair 'Edit warning', pull, or flair 'Possible Disinformation'.
Should you submit another post that needs to be flaired, you will be banned from v/pizzagate.
Cheers.
@Vindicator @Crensch @EricKaliberhall @ben_matlock
EffYouJohnPodesta ago
I have no idea if they were under age, I assume that they would be dabbling in all of the stuff. I'll delete it. Thanks for your lovely comment! @carmencita @Cc1914 @ESOTERICshade
carmencita ago
OK it is sad. There should be more looking into this, but hey. I get why.
EffYouJohnPodesta ago
I'm being banned from pizzagate for my last story about sex trafficking with Sallyport Global because the article did not specify whether they were sex trafficking children. The mods here are soooooooo mad that I said Q was fake. And that I proved Vindicator was an idiot for claiming my earlier post about the cops was disinformation.
Vindicator ago
EYJP, wtf are you talking about? If you're going to sling shit, you'd better provide links. Making unbased claims is the most transparent of shill tactics. Also, I see you are shit-talking me without the balls to ping me. Another shill move.
No one gives a shit whether you think Q is fake. Many people think so, and you thought the Derram bot was stalking you. Why would anyone care what you think about Q, or anything else? Get over yourself. You true colors are showing.
EffYouJohnPodesta ago
I always provide links when a link is required. I didn't think I was required to hyperlink to the thoughts in my brain based on your behavior. If you're going to sling shit about me, don't lie in your hyperlink about what was said in the supposed link, thinking nobody is going to ever see the other side.
Vindicator ago
What a retarded argument. If I wanted to lie about what you said, why in hell would I link directly to what you said? FFS. I stand by my comment history, as I always have and always will.
EffYouJohnPodesta ago
You're deceiving people about what I said, clearly.
Vindicator ago
I am quite happy to let the community be the judge of that.
After seeing your lame attempt to push the idea Pizzagate mods are corrupt for enforcing the community-chosen rules and following Voat's sitewide rules on Twitter, I am now convinced you have been deliberately waging a campaign baiting mods to ban so you can play the victim by posting numerous rule-breaking posts which have to be edited.