What you're missing is the variable of credibility. People have put their reputations at stake here. I don't know about you, but I wouldn't take the chance, as that becomes easily provable and boom, there it goes, all of it gone. Secondly, the timing is off. There were way better times to have pulled off a hoax of this magnitude for maximum impact.
Saying ''I have no facts'' is equivalent to "I have no proof" otherwise she would be suicided... and on the otherside, until Guccifer 2.0 is unmasked, i imagine people will make up their own minds on his credibility. I do agree with you on wikileaks, I've been paying closer attention for the last 4 months, and their modus operandi has unusually changed. There was no need for that.
view the rest of the comments →
DarkMath ago
Can someone help me understand why a screenshot that could easily have been photoshopped is presented as solid evidence?
What am I missing?
The_Roman_Numeral ago
What you're missing is the variable of credibility. People have put their reputations at stake here. I don't know about you, but I wouldn't take the chance, as that becomes easily provable and boom, there it goes, all of it gone. Secondly, the timing is off. There were way better times to have pulled off a hoax of this magnitude for maximum impact.
DarkMath ago
I'm not trying to be my usual sarcastic self but Robbin Young says "I have no facts".
On the other side of the conversation is Guccifer 2.0 who is a hacker and consequently has lost most of his credibility.
What this whole thing tells me is Wikileaks doesn't have jack shit or they've been compromised. Either way it's not good.
The_Roman_Numeral ago
Saying ''I have no facts'' is equivalent to "I have no proof" otherwise she would be suicided... and on the otherside, until Guccifer 2.0 is unmasked, i imagine people will make up their own minds on his credibility. I do agree with you on wikileaks, I've been paying closer attention for the last 4 months, and their modus operandi has unusually changed. There was no need for that.