You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Don-Keyhote ago

Did the rticle not mention predatory homosexuals or were you too cowardly to? Sexually mature and willing girls shouldn't even be on oUr radar. Look at hollywood, diddling boys is the greater crime because they grow up to offend as well

burnerdrone04 ago

It didn't. I take it the author of the article was involved with producing the "non-abusive" type of CP using child models in lingerie and provocative poses often with their parents permi$$ion. The angle from the author that was new to me was his familiarity of how the CP distribution networks operate. It didn't cover rape, molestation or any other form of abuse that happens privately. Only the stuff that is turned into CP for distribution. In the case of sexually mature and willing, I still view it as harmful because of my moral views and I also think that there are certain things you just shouldn't introduce to kids (like drugs). I don't think it's okay to give a kid drugs because they are willing. I don't think it's okay to shoot child porn because the kids are willing. I believe pornography in general distorts sexuality and causes interpersonal relationship problems at a minimum. If you're talking about a 17 year old girl who want's to pose naked for money, I still object because of moral reasons (unless she is a nude model for an art class... see grey area).