No, it wasn't acting. It really happened, and it put that child's life in very serious danger. It was criminally irresponsible. One slip and that child was as good as dead, and it easily could have happened. Keeping two hands on him would have been bad enough, but he even had the baby in just one arm as he dangled him over the edge. That baby had no say in his life being gambled with that way. Children are at the mercy of people around them, and that child was let down.
That was narcissism on his part, narcissistic risk-taking with the boy's life. And because he was rich and "legendary" - and only because he was - there were no consequences. The sobering thing is, if he'd ever really faced some consequences, he might very well be alive today, forced to face what was wrong with him and so saved from himself. But what people got from him, for themselves, mattered more than his life did.
You could say the same thing about anybody that ever puts a child in an automobile. One eye off the road for a second, and the child could certainly die.
I think you're misunderstanding me. It is acting, on a much bigger scale. Some celebrities' entire lives are veritable shows. That incident made for a good "episode" so you have no idea why he did it or what was going on. Notice how he was hiding his face? He wasn't in control of the situation, obviously.
You should start wondering why so many celebrities died on 2016. A lot of shows were "terminated" by the people running them. Nothing about Hollywood is real, and I'd say 70-80% of celebs have little to no control over their actions. You're conditioned to heap scorn on them because that's all you can see on the surface. You should be wondering about who is causing them to do this stuff behind the curtain.
Well, first, I wonder why you seem quite unfamiliar with Jackson's life. Are you possibly not very old? The incident in Berlin was well-known, and also that he covered the faces of his children all the time, quite oddly, and I believe possibly also himself at times.
While it may be impossible to say, too, that he wasn't being controlled or influenced by someone to act out, on the other hand, there is also plenty of evidence to support that he was merely a powerful person himself acting out what he wanted to do in these incidents.
As for celebrities dying last year, I don't think that 2016 was in and of itself unusual at all. It certainly didn't seem like it, but more like the election made Hollywood grim so they responded more than usual to entertainer deaths. But notable entertainers die just about every day, usually only getting a few second's mention on the news, except for the more famous ones, who get more coverage. Quite a number of them die each year too. If you go back and look year by year, you'll see that's the case.
I agree, just wanted to put the video up of what the other person was talking about. I don't think it was as big of a deal as everyone made of it. For instance, my parents used to toss us in the back of a truck and go driving down the freeway when I was about 5 years old. Today they would be on the news. It's all part of the "state" wanting to own everyone's children. That baby is fine and he had no intention on hurting him, just like I'm fine and my parents had no intention of hurting me.
view the rest of the comments →
ThePuppetShow ago
Here's the video. It was when everyone was trying to get a picture of the baby.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9ElddgJCgyg
PleadingtheYiff ago
He's acting....very odd in that situation.
Look into his life more, it wasn't what it seemed on the surface.
Psalm100 ago
No, it wasn't acting. It really happened, and it put that child's life in very serious danger. It was criminally irresponsible. One slip and that child was as good as dead, and it easily could have happened. Keeping two hands on him would have been bad enough, but he even had the baby in just one arm as he dangled him over the edge. That baby had no say in his life being gambled with that way. Children are at the mercy of people around them, and that child was let down.
That was narcissism on his part, narcissistic risk-taking with the boy's life. And because he was rich and "legendary" - and only because he was - there were no consequences. The sobering thing is, if he'd ever really faced some consequences, he might very well be alive today, forced to face what was wrong with him and so saved from himself. But what people got from him, for themselves, mattered more than his life did.
crazy_eyes ago
You could say the same thing about anybody that ever puts a child in an automobile. One eye off the road for a second, and the child could certainly die.
PleadingtheYiff ago
I think you're misunderstanding me. It is acting, on a much bigger scale. Some celebrities' entire lives are veritable shows. That incident made for a good "episode" so you have no idea why he did it or what was going on. Notice how he was hiding his face? He wasn't in control of the situation, obviously.
You should start wondering why so many celebrities died on 2016. A lot of shows were "terminated" by the people running them. Nothing about Hollywood is real, and I'd say 70-80% of celebs have little to no control over their actions. You're conditioned to heap scorn on them because that's all you can see on the surface. You should be wondering about who is causing them to do this stuff behind the curtain.
Psalm100 ago
Well, first, I wonder why you seem quite unfamiliar with Jackson's life. Are you possibly not very old? The incident in Berlin was well-known, and also that he covered the faces of his children all the time, quite oddly, and I believe possibly also himself at times.
While it may be impossible to say, too, that he wasn't being controlled or influenced by someone to act out, on the other hand, there is also plenty of evidence to support that he was merely a powerful person himself acting out what he wanted to do in these incidents.
As for celebrities dying last year, I don't think that 2016 was in and of itself unusual at all. It certainly didn't seem like it, but more like the election made Hollywood grim so they responded more than usual to entertainer deaths. But notable entertainers die just about every day, usually only getting a few second's mention on the news, except for the more famous ones, who get more coverage. Quite a number of them die each year too. If you go back and look year by year, you'll see that's the case.
ThePuppetShow ago
I agree, just wanted to put the video up of what the other person was talking about. I don't think it was as big of a deal as everyone made of it. For instance, my parents used to toss us in the back of a truck and go driving down the freeway when I was about 5 years old. Today they would be on the news. It's all part of the "state" wanting to own everyone's children. That baby is fine and he had no intention on hurting him, just like I'm fine and my parents had no intention of hurting me.
PleadingtheYiff ago
I mean, it's obvious that the whole scene was contrived intentionally to create controversy.
Go watch the Truman Show again, and then start looking at celebs and how they act. It's very enlightening.