I've found hidden data in one of the Podesta email images, but I dont know the password! HELP!!! [Steganography]

I've found hidden data in one of the Podesta email images, but I dont know the password! HELP!!! [Steganography] (pizzagate)

submitted 7.9 years ago by TheUltimateDebate

I was using a Steganography detection software and it flagged the following image as using a steganography method called "jphide": http://i.imgur.com/a3pUmpH.jpg

Now, the thing is that when I try to use Jphide to uncover the data it asks for a password, and the only thing I had to try with was the filename, but because I originally found the image from THIS site http://hollaforums.com/thread/8067477/politics/open-directory-found-from-the-podesta-emails-large.html and on the site the image was called "1477744604436.jpg" (which does not seem to be the original name from the Podesta emails because when I searched for that filename it didn't come up with any results). I therefore need YOUR help in finding the Podesta e-mail from where this photo was taken from, so that we can see if there are any suggestions of a password that we can use to crack the image file. Most probably the password will be the name of the original file, so if ya'll PLEASE can help me locate this photo from the Podesta e-mails we might have a chance to uncover what's hidden in this file!!

For anyone who's interested, this is how it looked when I scanned the photos. You will see that the photo in question is flagged as being encrypted with "jphide" steganography method: http://i.imgur.com/VtlG3My.jpg

God Bless!

456 comments

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

NoRagrets 7.9 years ago

In the thread on 4chan, "SwissGuy" appears to have used an app available at http://hanynet.com/isteg/
This is software for a Mac which I do not have access to.

Using OpenStego I tried to decrypt the image in OPs post (downloaded from wikileaks, not imgur).
Following instructions from Swiss Guy, I tried 3 possible strings as the password, none worked.
e63csp284426lfb
g68mr68626420yke.23.1417453546899
g68mr68626420yke.23.1417453546962

So then I tried reproducing Swiss Guys experiment.
Tried decrypting pizza.jpg (downloaded from https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10037)) with OpenStego using password q11mr1694671qaj.9.1249698062233
Did not work.

Edit: Formatting

Edit2: Retried all the above tests using alternative Stegonography software as OP mentioned jphide.
Tests still fail using JPHS for Windows

Edit3: It's important to note that when OP uploaded the file to Imgur, he may have fucked with the encryption, so it's necessary to download the original from Wikileaks;

PS C:\Users\[REDACTED]\Downloads> (Get-FileHash .\a3pUmpH.jpg -Algorithm MD5).Hash
367F795D2554BE4CEDFD51D89E6A4A87
PS C:\Users\[REDACTED]\Downloads> (Get-FileHash .\IMG_20141128_223509_244.jpg -Algorithm MD5).Hash
E401E278D4464A4314327D5AA9259E9D

link

Investigate1999 7.9 years ago

Everybody, please suggest strings that this guy can use. I thought that I saw some gibberish strings floating around in our discussions.

link

BarryOSeven 7.9 years ago

WikiLeaks is compromised, mails had been tampered with.

We need the image from a first hour backupper.

link

DriftingDevoid 7.9 years ago

I would be interested in this link too

edit: or do some checksum comparison with the one I've just downloaded

link

Atarian 7.9 years ago

I'm interested in why you think that?

(I haven't been on this sub in a while)

link

BarryOSeven 7.9 years ago

The mere fact that Assange is acting suspicious. He still gave no proof of live, no real proof. Just two interviews in which at least one has been CGI for sure.

He could just wave outside the window.

So until he shows real proof of life I assume WikiLeaks compromised and advise everybody to do so.

link

ich1baN 7.9 years ago

Assange isn't dead. There's no way this interview with Sean Hannity is with a double... Sean is literally sitting 2 feet from Julian. This isn't CGIed... the only way possible is if Sean is in on it and he has been on Julian's side this whole time... actually the only journalist that has given him airtime even well before he was this highly controversial:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYZ-aYwm5Fo

link

oldman123 7.9 years ago

send link to archive and ill compare markers

link

BarryOSeven 7.9 years ago

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/35941

Could you try to find if the image hash in this email is the same as the one from the backup?

link

oldman123 7.9 years ago

easily, but where is the backup?

link

BarryOSeven 7.9 years ago

Oh I misunderstood, i thought you had a backup.

Maybe it's a good idea to try to find someone with a backup (must be here somewhere) and compare all current wikileaks mails with the backup.

It could prove wikileaks has been compromised and it could show us which images had steganography

link

oldman123 7.9 years ago

I know which images have steg lol

link

BarryOSeven 7.9 years ago

for sure?

Could you please supply us with a list with all images which had stegano?

If we could wordlist this using multiple steganotools chances are high imho it will return something.

I don't think the Pedo-sta bro's are entering a 64char passphrase everytime they receive an image.

Actually, there has to be a mark they use for the other pedo's to show them there is stegano in the image. Like using cards in images. Or double dots on line endings something like that.

If they had to pull every image through their stegano decrypter using a long passphrase it would be hell for them, there has to be something to let eachother know there is stegano.

link

Investigate1999 7.9 years ago

Is it possible that there is a water mark that is barely visible? I used GIMP to see if there might be something, but I'm concerned that I might not be using it properly. I tried to use something like a historigram or whatever.

link

BarryOSeven 7.9 years ago

It won't work that way. There are mutliple methods to add stegano in which some of the methods allows the user to spot there is stegano in it (LSB, change pixel values slightly)

But sometimes they hide it in other places of the file, png layers or something else.

I do recall an image of some Arabian article sent to Hillary Clinton, somebody spotted there was hidden data in it. It looked like some sort of optical illusion.

I think that one was important. Who knows what the optical illusion does to somebody's mind. Could be some sort of emotion tampering basilisk or something.

link

Investigate1999 7.9 years ago

I used a hexeditor to look at the beginning of an Arctic [or Antarctic?] image and the end of it, and found nothing.

By the way, thanks for your explanation.

link

BarryOSeven 7.9 years ago

Yup, that could be a way to find one method. But if they are using Least Significant Byte stego they are altering the least significant bytes to have values which can decrypt it. It would change the image slightly but not really noticable without seeing the original.

Personally I think there is stegano in images, but I think it will be hard to decompress them because I think the criminals forked an existing tool and modified it slightly to use for their personal nasty stuff.

If I were pedosta I would do that.

link

Investigate1999 7.9 years ago

I totally agree with you in general. I'm just not skilled enough to form an informed opinion.

Maybe we need a specific forum for us to discuss only images and the hidden data.

link

oldman123 7.9 years ago

The program he used was a full copy of hiderman and then he even had them encrypted in a way that when you look at it through hiderman it'll say nothing is there. It's there. The jphide shit is wrong. Hiderman and force decryption.