The same article also named the guys running the Washington Post weather blog as in the top 50. And another restauranteur, Jose Andres, and three women who work as party planners. It's GQ, not a serious politics mag, so I think they just might have been trying to throw some people in who don't work in politics so it's not super boring.
I'm not sure about that....
I'm guessing the owner at a florist shop, or a taxi-cab company owner might wonder why they were over-looked, if that were the case.
The mag would state that their the most socialite business owner, or some other type of identification, instead of the most influential/powerful.
Something's not right there.
What's GQ's overall deal, other than a mag about gentlemen?
view the rest of the comments →
Sentastixc ago
Indeed. This is one of the main pieces of circumstantial evidence that proves that more is going on than meets the eye.
pizzathrowaway ago
The same article also named the guys running the Washington Post weather blog as in the top 50. And another restauranteur, Jose Andres, and three women who work as party planners. It's GQ, not a serious politics mag, so I think they just might have been trying to throw some people in who don't work in politics so it's not super boring.
cosmicmind ago
I'm not sure about that.... I'm guessing the owner at a florist shop, or a taxi-cab company owner might wonder why they were over-looked, if that were the case. The mag would state that their the most socialite business owner, or some other type of identification, instead of the most influential/powerful.
Something's not right there. What's GQ's overall deal, other than a mag about gentlemen?
pizzathrowaway ago
It's mostly about fashion and style and culture.