You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Princeofcats ago

Yeah. Flyers might be good. I engage everyone I know at some level: not necessarily the current research but the long history of child abuse by powerful people. I focus on proven cases and and connections to lay a foundation and then present the speculation.

And I use social media - it's not totally censored yet but it'll get you fired I'm sure. Clinton is spinning this right now, and the legacy News is using the FakeNews narrative to its advantage in some ways. I tag old cases of child abuse and such as "FakeNews" from so-called reputable news sources to illustrate how they're ignoring they're own reports.

We have to chip away at the mass psyche that basically doesn't want to deal with this information. We have to do this while shills and impatient people will undermine our position. I stress rational arguments and allowing people to,come to terms with it with a bit of patience. This is the last taboo, really.

toadog123 ago

Agreed. I think a big problem is that you see what you align with on Facebook. so for us, sure it appears semi-uncensored - we're looking for it. Though for those who aren't yet aware, there isn't anyway to get that initial exposure without being confronted by the first page google articles.

One morning soon we're all going to wakeup someone with a large audience will have reported, and shit will hit the fan. I absolutely cannot wait

Princeofcats ago

Until then every conversation counts.