Jesus Christ i was trying to refrain from explaining myself further but i feel that i must now. The above thread which I started was a honest effort at looking through Tonys Podesta's friends (who we already know is inner circle) to make lists and crosscheck other peoples business that may be involved in his sphere of influence. Clearly there is a large ring of pedophiles that operate across the world, and pizzagate revelations in the past month and a half, have shed a tiny light on an already known topic. So i Dont think my approach here was batshit crazy. In reference to @legionwill who has been bashing me about my past submissions as well as this one, I say; In haste upon, finding these photos on these profiles, and without putting much time into reading deeper i simply posted here to VOAT where i asked for others to archive since i had trouble doing so quickly from my phone at the time. I even made an edit to the post which states i made these findings in haste and im simply sharing them with all you other supposed investigators. people posts nonsense shit on here all day, and old news, and disinformation, and i dont see all these haters @legionwill spewing racial slurs and hate at them; quite like they are here on my thread.
This is supposed to be a place where we can share information and help each other follow leads, if its old news, or if it has no merit, thats the whole fucking idea, that we get to discuss it.
In retrospect many good points have been made about posting these photos without more incriminating evidence, and i admitidly misunderstodd some of the context perhaps, but thats why we share this.

as to the CPLOVE there is nowhere to indicate that it is being used as "campus progressives" in this case, and if you arent well versed enough to know what CP means in the real pedo world, download yourself a tor browser and type CP in Ahmia.fi. I Am certainly not the first to say this either, im being a tad sarcastic., but truth nonetheless. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cp

None of my submissions here have ever stated anything in bad faith. I joined Voat after watching the censorship on other forums, and since i had a prior knowledge to the franklin coverup, the hampstead case, and SRA in general, i wanted to contribute following leads. Most of my submissions have discussion on both sides, three out of the four were making connections to legitimate people involved, there are far worse people on here doing undoubtably intentional misdirection disinfo, but its not me. I challenge anyone to look at my past submissions.

I feel fine with speaking my mind when i find possible connections and sharing them with the community, we should all feel welcomed and safe in doing so. my only apology is relaying a possibly bad lead, but we all take that risk when sharing leads, kudos to those of you that encourage open convo, in theory the "shit posts" should fall to the bottom of the submissions anyways, so why all the hate here, just saying?