You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

shadow332 ago

"pesticides.news", wow looks like an amazingly reliable site there. Look you can get yourself a bioscarf!.

This user only posts from: rt, sputniknews, zero hedge and fucking rense.com. At least whoever made the account is honest about it with the username.

SearchVoatBot ago

This comment was linked from this v/ProtectVoat submission by @benisXDDD.

Posted automatically (#24068) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.

MadWorld ago

Thanks for the update! On Voat, we have a lot of sleeper accounts. This domain is a bit like those sleeper accounts.

Domain: pesticides.news, whois
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registered On: 2017-01-25
Expires On: 2020-01-25
Updated On: 2019-01-26, recently updated.
Traffic History: long time domain(sleeper), only showed a single spike on 2018-09-30.
Submitters:
* 2019-02-18 05:16 PolishBot v/news, 23 days

As you can see, this domain was registered as early as 2017. It was recently updated, followed by submission to Voat. The domain has sufficient amount of data, yet has ZERO user interaction, only shows a single spike in its traffic history. Those are some of the signs of non-authentic website.

@offender also has a good suggestion, to sort users by domain names.

offender ago

That site you're using for traffic history isn't reliable. It's an estimate of traffic based off of it's ranking on alexa, which is why you see a big spike. Going off some SEO tools, it started getting traffic in March 2018.

Here are some potential leads: reach.news and fetch.news

offender ago

@MadWorld

Make a list of the accounts posting from russian news sites and you'll come across a lot of shills. They've been doing this for years on imageboards, it's likely part of a big multi-million-dollar state-run propaganda network.

selpai ago

Says the 5 month old account.

shadow332 ago

There's quite a few of these accounts. I've started to follow them since @MadWorld started his research and I've noticed they all have the same tell-tale signs:

  • only post a limited number of sites, e.g. breitbart, zero hedge, diversitymachtfrei, sputnik news, rt, and so on

  • never comment on the article themselves, never a discussion post, always just a direct link post

  • never post an archived version, always a live link to the site

  • when they comment, it's short comments always along the lines of "gas the kikes, race war nao" "fuck the democrats", etc. (I don't like the dems either but there are things I dislike about Trump too). Their arguments are very, let's say, too simple and one-sided.

I'm not sure if they're bots, but if what I keep asking myself is: if these are people just posting stuff, why don't they EVER archive, why do they use the same shitty sources over and over again? I stopped using breitbart and zero hedge because I noticed, they never write anything original, they just repost a mashup from other sources with overly sensational titles. When I looked into the original articles from, say, the German sources, I've found that what these contolled sites report is in fact misleading or just plain wrong information.

Broc_Lia ago

My assumption is that they're either a clickbait farm, or they're part of the failed op to set up the fake news narrative that no one's gotten around to shutting down yet.

KinkRaven ago

Glysophate contamination in non gmo foods and in the water supply is well established.

You can get a testing kit for under $100 if you want to verify it yourself.

Dr. Stephanie Senef is the source for this research and her papers are available on her MIT site.

The site and poster may be shit but the issue is very real and the documentation is out there.

I doubt you'll bother reading any of it.

Broc_Lia ago

Glysophate contamination in non gmo foods and in the water supply is well established.

Okay?

You can get a testing kit for under $100 if you want to verify it yourself.

Never said otherwise

Dr. Stephanie Senef is the source for this research and her papers are available on her MIT site.

That's nice

The site and poster may be shit but the issue is very real and the documentation is out there.

"Contamination" isn't an issue unless a toxic dosage is present. If it's not then everything you just wrote is irrelevant. Everything you eat is contaminated by something.

KinkRaven ago

Whatever you are clearly a shill and don't bother to read anything.

Keep thinking you are smart and please kys. I enjoy how you skip over the 'glysophates are replacing glycine during protein synthesis' which is caused by minute amounts of it in your system.

Anyway you are a disingenuous little faggot and you need to go back to Reddit or kys

Broc_Lia ago

Have a nice day

KinkRaven ago

Still skipping over the core point.

Do you understand how bad it is and the outcomes when glysophate is replacing glycine during protein synthesis?

Your entire point has been BTFO yet you still act like a fucking Redditor.

Broc_Lia ago

it's likely part of a big multi-million-dollar state-run propaganda network.

More likely a clickbait farm, but whatever

offender ago

maybe, but it's really weird how some of these sites are exported wordpress sites, as HTML and use lots of fake names/aliases