There wasn't any problem with me understanding your comment. I was calling you out as a possible shill account yet here you are, not denying, not defending yourself from accusation but clarifying a previous comment as if I didn't understand what you were trying to convey. The issue isn't with what you're conveying, but rather why and what your motives are behind them.
There have been two comments now by you, one here and one on another thread that struck me as oddly worded. I almost commented on it but decided against it. I saw this post and your comment and that is when I responded.
Then we have terminology that you are using such as:
This is a prime example of the slippery slope neolibs poo-pooed as conspiracy screed.
I've never seen anyone use language like that. Who the fuck says, "poo-pooed" and "conspiracy screed". What the fuck is "conspiracy screed"? Wait, don't tell me, I don't care to know. All the above is very fishy for a very young account.
I'll make it very clear, you appear to either be a Legitimate voat user or someone who is paid to present opposing opinions and/or create doubt in accepted fact on here in order to sow doubt among the voat users us in regards to issues that aren't clear cut.
Member how libtards say its not a big deal to censor certain words? that was just a ploy to keep boxing in what is allowed to say.
So now some dude who criticized abortion is in trouble.
And why should I deny being a shill... My opinions are clearly right wing. If I just had sex with a chick and someone called me gay, would I even get mad, let alone bother to deny it?
Not your bro. Huge flag right there calling someone bro. First time it has happened on here and I've had plenty of conversations at this point to know that you do not fit the normal voat user.
I don't need an explanation of the situation I understand it fine. Never was the issue. The issue I have is with you as a user and what appears to be your trying to put up this "right wing opinion" front in order to sow division. I made this clear and yet you still don't understand.
First off the fact that you call Common Sense opinions and facts right wing is another flag. You have common sense, which is what the MSM labels as "right wing" and then you have insanity which is called "The Left".
For all we know you are putting up these "Right Wing" opinions in order to make yourself look right wing. It has happened before and continues to this day.
Like I said though, I could be wrong, but your comments are odd. Either way, I don't care any further than what I have posted. I made a comment to note what I saw was odd and if I turn out to be right, well at least I called you out on it.
view the rest of the comments →
northportage ago
One of Ontario's first political prisoners.
duh_1234 ago
That's not even attacking a race, gender, etc. This is a prime example of the slippery slope neolibs poo-pooed as conspiracy screed.
valk2 ago
Can't decide if you're controlled opposition or a legit user. Concerning if you are larping.
duh_1234 ago
What I'm saying is first they come for things like "ending racism," then they come for unpopular opinions, then they come for unsanctioned opinions.
valk2 ago
There wasn't any problem with me understanding your comment. I was calling you out as a possible shill account yet here you are, not denying, not defending yourself from accusation but clarifying a previous comment as if I didn't understand what you were trying to convey. The issue isn't with what you're conveying, but rather why and what your motives are behind them.
There have been two comments now by you, one here and one on another thread that struck me as oddly worded. I almost commented on it but decided against it. I saw this post and your comment and that is when I responded.
Then we have terminology that you are using such as:
I've never seen anyone use language like that. Who the fuck says, "poo-pooed" and "conspiracy screed". What the fuck is "conspiracy screed"? Wait, don't tell me, I don't care to know. All the above is very fishy for a very young account.
I'll make it very clear, you appear to either be a Legitimate voat user or someone who is paid to present opposing opinions and/or create doubt in accepted fact on here in order to sow doubt among the voat users us in regards to issues that aren't clear cut.
duh_1234 ago
Ok bro, I'll use simple words.
Member how libtards say its not a big deal to censor certain words? that was just a ploy to keep boxing in what is allowed to say.
So now some dude who criticized abortion is in trouble.
And why should I deny being a shill... My opinions are clearly right wing. If I just had sex with a chick and someone called me gay, would I even get mad, let alone bother to deny it?
valk2 ago
Not your bro. Huge flag right there calling someone bro. First time it has happened on here and I've had plenty of conversations at this point to know that you do not fit the normal voat user.
I don't need an explanation of the situation I understand it fine. Never was the issue. The issue I have is with you as a user and what appears to be your trying to put up this "right wing opinion" front in order to sow division. I made this clear and yet you still don't understand.
First off the fact that you call Common Sense opinions and facts right wing is another flag. You have common sense, which is what the MSM labels as "right wing" and then you have insanity which is called "The Left".
For all we know you are putting up these "Right Wing" opinions in order to make yourself look right wing. It has happened before and continues to this day.
Like I said though, I could be wrong, but your comments are odd. Either way, I don't care any further than what I have posted. I made a comment to note what I saw was odd and if I turn out to be right, well at least I called you out on it.