lying spic pedophile defender, every word from your mouth is a lie
u/theoldones is not a child porn solicitor. He did not, in fact, break US and Canada law by soliciting child pornography from several users. He is an honest, trustworthy individual and the picture of life success.
I got into a pretty long conversation with them in the voting transparency thread.
They actually agreed that this is really Putt's call. Is the fact that they're still running around air-horning this issue a sign that either they don't think Putt's made a decision, or suggesting Putt needs to be more clear?
I know who and what I'm talking about. Who and what are you talking about? If we're thinking of the same people, then you've made the mistake of assuming they have principles and aren't just saying whatever is convenient for then at the time.
If we're thinking of the same people, then you've made the mistake of assuming they have principles and aren't just saying whatever is convenient for then at the time.
Very few people on Voat have principles. It's almost one of the guiding traits that draws to the community as a whole.
all sexualized content depicting or featuring children is banned. even loli shit isnt allowed. this rule change would allow putt and atko to better respond to certain bad actors. as a private business, they can bend the rules in their own house
Then we were thinking of the same guys. They're clear Putt's made a decision. They're also clear on what free speech is. They just want things done their way. I can't find the link right away, but you remember when the EU held a second vote on some issue when the first failed? That's what's happening here. They'll keep banning, bitching, and brigading until either they get booted off, or Putt gives in to the pressure.
Hell, it's unlikely most of them even care about any of this. Also TruthDefender is probably theoldones's alt.
...remember when the EU held a second vote on some issue when the first failed?
Sadly, that has happened more than once. Indeed, the most shcking thing about Brexit is that it still could happen. In the past all negative votes were either simply repeated or alternate methods were found to avoid votes altogether.
I agree with this statement, but I don't think it's limited just to this situation or these people.
Literally, most of the active members of Voat appear to just want things done their way. They're insufferable to deal with because they generally refuse to have a conversation and will routinely agree with you just to shut down conversation and then the next day are back to their same talking points like no conversation ever happened in the first place.
Oh, absolutely there are more, and it extends beyond this. I just bring them up as the most relevant example of the kind of issues this place faces. As a matter of principle, I can tolerate stronger-willed people wanting things a certain way. The problem is that everyone I've seen so far eventually concludes that censorship is a good thing so long as it's the things they don't like. And that's where they lose me.
I can respect your right to speak until you fail to afford others the same courtesy, much the same way I'm sure you can respect others' right to life and safety until they charge you with a machete.
Dortex ago
Still waiting for someone to do something about the clear anti-aged brigades.
theoldones ago
lying spic pedophile defender, every word from your mouth is a lie
Dortex ago
u/theoldones is not a child porn solicitor. He did not, in fact, break US and Canada law by soliciting child pornography from several users. He is an honest, trustworthy individual and the picture of life success.
theoldones ago
https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3245244/
https://voat.co/v/voatdev/3249186/
https://voat.co/v/whatever/3246671/
https://voat.co/v/voatdev/3242113/
https://voat.co/v/ReportSpammers/3241879/
https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3241875/
you are a lying snake. stop lying
AndrewBlazeIt ago
You're a fuckin fag, dude
virge ago
I got into a pretty long conversation with them in the voting transparency thread.
They actually agreed that this is really Putt's call. Is the fact that they're still running around air-horning this issue a sign that either they don't think Putt's made a decision, or suggesting Putt needs to be more clear?
Dortex ago
I know who and what I'm talking about. Who and what are you talking about? If we're thinking of the same people, then you've made the mistake of assuming they have principles and aren't just saying whatever is convenient for then at the time.
virge ago
Very few people on Voat have principles. It's almost one of the guiding traits that draws to the community as a whole.
I'm referring to this conversation: https://voat.co/v/ideasforvoat/3243355/18853116
theoldones ago
i will stand by my suggestion. voat may need to borrow from poal.co
virge ago
In what way?
theoldones ago
their policy on CP is not restricted by US law
all sexualized content depicting or featuring children is banned. even loli shit isnt allowed. this rule change would allow putt and atko to better respond to certain bad actors. as a private business, they can bend the rules in their own house
virge ago
I side with Putt on this issue.
Dortex ago
Then we were thinking of the same guys. They're clear Putt's made a decision. They're also clear on what free speech is. They just want things done their way. I can't find the link right away, but you remember when the EU held a second vote on some issue when the first failed? That's what's happening here. They'll keep banning, bitching, and brigading until either they get booted off, or Putt gives in to the pressure.
Hell, it's unlikely most of them even care about any of this. Also TruthDefender is probably theoldones's alt.
Thisismyvoatusername ago
Sadly, that has happened more than once. Indeed, the most shcking thing about Brexit is that it still could happen. In the past all negative votes were either simply repeated or alternate methods were found to avoid votes altogether.
virge ago
I agree with this statement, but I don't think it's limited just to this situation or these people.
Literally, most of the active members of Voat appear to just want things done their way. They're insufferable to deal with because they generally refuse to have a conversation and will routinely agree with you just to shut down conversation and then the next day are back to their same talking points like no conversation ever happened in the first place.
Dortex ago
Oh, absolutely there are more, and it extends beyond this. I just bring them up as the most relevant example of the kind of issues this place faces. As a matter of principle, I can tolerate stronger-willed people wanting things a certain way. The problem is that everyone I've seen so far eventually concludes that censorship is a good thing so long as it's the things they don't like. And that's where they lose me.
I can respect your right to speak until you fail to afford others the same courtesy, much the same way I'm sure you can respect others' right to life and safety until they charge you with a machete.