As promised, here is our financial status as of January 25, 2016.
Our hosting bills for the months 7, 8 and 9 of 2015 (the ones we paid out of pocket): $15'442.89.
CloudFlare DDoS protection for 2015 and Jan 2016: $1'593.33.
We are currently using our startup credits to cover our hosting bills. This will end by June 2016 and then we're on our own.
We have some 21k in bitcoin and a smaller amount in Dogecoin, and we plan to use this to cover the costs we paid out of pocket. PayPal donations have also helped cover some of the costs above and costs prior to 7 2015. We plan to decrease our hosting costs by further optimizing our platform, but there is also an option to migrate to another hosting provider if we can get more value for our money.
We are in the process of setting up our merchant account with a US bank, and if all goes well, we should be able to sell products and services and process credit cards.
If I missed to mention this, Voat is now a registered Delaware company and me and PuttitOut are the sole owners. Company registration is also another large cost which we covered ourselves. We have not taken any investments (although we did receive quite a few offers and inquiries).
With massive optimization and cost cuts, starting with July 2016, our monthly costs will easily go above 5k and we will obviously need your help to stay online. I may have missed to mention some costs, I will update this announcement if I remember anything. Please note that I wrote this in haste (I have a full time job which is rather exhausting as you may have noticed).
@PuttitOut: please feel free to edit this thread if you wish to add something or correct any mistakes I may have made.
If you have ideas what we can do to help keep Voat online, this is your time to shine. One-time sale of products/services usually don't work in the long term, so we need to think of something which will provide recurring income.
I have to run out, but I'll be back later to answer any questions you may have. I'm looking forward to hearing your ideas.
Finally, a big thank you to all who donated, but also thank you everyone else who wanted to donate but could not, for whatever reason.
4631302? ago
I will white-list the site if you run non-intrusive ads on the sidebars.
AlwaysInService ago
Like a couple of other people said - I wouldn't mind disabling my AdBlock for Voat, as long as it's not some videos with ads that would freeze my laptop for hours. If you set up the bank account so that we can donate through PayPal I will also gladly do that.
Creative_voat_user ago
It's too bad there's no real way if decentralising entire websites (if there is, let me know) I might not be able to donate money, but I'd gladly donate bandwidth.
Subtenko ago
Is this what the 111 days thing is about? Is there an update on this thread?
Also, you the voat guys have any financial background? or good with finances? idk just asking cause if not, it would be good to find someone trustworthy to fit the duty
fieryaries44 ago
Its looking like it may end up being some type of donation system, like if everyone who loves the site would chip in a few dollars then maybe
DrSmartV ago
Either your fedora is too tight, or you're just being absurdly wrong on purpose.
DrSmartV ago
Yes: Bitcoin is a pyramid scheme, and it's alternative, cash, is an actual currency.
spaghettijesus ago
Have a page where users can voluntarily click through and watch various advertisements. Add a section for Contribution Points in the user profile page, similar to Submission Contribution Points: Comment Contribution Points:, for Voat.co Financial Contribution Points. There can be trophies and other incentives for users to click through ads. If a user consistently earns Financial Contribution Points, a little icon can be displayed next to their user name when they post, so other users know which users are helping to keep the site running.
To take it a step farther, these Financial Contribution Points can be used to earn, or buy, downvoats. Users will have a "stash" of downvoats they can dish out; Each downvoat you dish out, one will be subtracted from your stash. Once your stash of downvoats is up, you would have to earn more in order to downvoat posts. You earn more by watching a few ads. This creates an incentive for users to watch ads and help support the site. Upvoats are free :)
Scine ago
I'd be ok with ads, or donating a couple of bucks.
That being said, I'm an IT Infrastructure Manager, so I'm coming from this from a technical standpoint. Could you host this site in house and have a significantly smaller bill? Not sure about the amount of infrastructure you have to run things, but that might be something worth taking a look at.
I'd be happy to offer technical expertise as well if need be, as I've built up infrastructure for large website's before.
Loumedia ago
Nice! Got a spot on the leader board. I'd like to move my position up, how is that done? I'm way more of a faggot keyboard warrior than any of those other casual faggots.
ChaseWegman ago
Why is voat bothering with it's own merchant account to sell stuff? Why is hosting costing so much? Seems like you are being ripped off. From the looks of it Voat is going to die due to mismanagement.
professor_hindsight ago
Create some kind of premium membership where you can give and receive actual money donations for the content or insight you provide. You take a 1% cut off all transactions.
Say I post my guitar tutorial channel and people dig it they can donate to me through you guys.
It incentifies quality content and gives people a new way to make money sharing.
a_random_sith ago
Maybe something like $5 a month or something small like that. Voat merchandise would be kinda cool. Easy stuff like shirts, coasters, and small things like that.
trecht ago
From my understanding you are students from Zurich, why would you register an American company then and not one in Switzerland?
Tydude ago
Patreon style crowdfunding perhaps? I know many of us would be willing to donate to keep this site alive ongoing.
rhabarba ago
A company needs to have a working financial concept to survive, see Twitter.
DrSmartV ago
Because bitcoin is a joke.
TheBigBlabberMouth ago
i would love to see what free market ads look like ^^
even thou i already know it will be a bunch of young porn \0/
rwbj ago
That's a non issue for two reasons. Even when paying taxes 'fairly', for corporations taxes are on net income. Imagine you only got taxed on what you had left at the end of the month after you paid for food, rent, insurance, etc. That's the deal corporations in America get. Beyond that Atko incorporated in Delaware which is a domestic tax haven. They have a well known legal exploit that allows corporations to pay minimal to no income tax. It's the reason the vast majority of, for example, fortune 500 companies are incorporated in the state.
od_man99 ago
Hey email me. I'm willing to invest in your platform.
Hyper_threaded ago
Something like a premium service that is 100% beyond arbitrary.
Want a star by your name? - 1 USD. Why? Because you have a mother fucking star next to your name. What's it mean? You spent a buck. You are amazing you glorious bastard!
Want a smile by your name? 1.50? Why? Because I made it that much, that's why...
I don't know. I'm just thinking. Would people pay for customized account/id flair? I feel like this idea (Let's face it, I'm trying to apply Micro transactions to Voat... So that this would be the "MicroTransaction Subverse... Universe.) needs to consist of one time purchases.
I fear that too much of the "Renew monthly" platform becomes another form of a /r/ circlejerk. But say I screwed up my post title and want to resubmit. It says "Please wait 60 seconds (whatever) before trying again. Or click "HERE" to resubmit now for a .20/cent donation.) Could this open you up to spam posting? MAYBE but they would have to be some well off (Or well connected with the Darknet) spammers.
Have I rambled on long enough yet? (Or used enough brackets?) (Because I could do both, more...)
edit: How do you keep people paying who just bought lifetime flair? You come out with new flair images every once in a while. People like change.. They also like spending change, to get change.
ialreadyhaveaccount ago
Give me an easy way to donate where I'm not giving my cc # to some shady bitcoin site and I'll drop some coin. I'm sure many others share that same mentality. Figure out and implement whatever Wikipedia did to be able to receive donations through people's Amazon accounts.
Why not start running small amounts of ads but create a pay-wall for ad free? I and many others would gladly support a couple bucks a month without even batting an eye...but you have to make it an easy adder to something they are already purchasing. i.e. selling merch shouldn't be overlooked. This is partly because if you create the account to purchase merch you can make it easy for users to donate or purchase other services from you. There are companies that can handle merch logistics from a-z, so it can be relatively painless.
RedditIsPropaganda23 ago
Voat really needs to lower it's costs.
Mildras ago
I have been wondering, is there a reason for why bitpay is used for donations? As far as I could see it would remove the "difficulty" of using bitcoin, please correct me if I am wrong.
sometimessage ago
At a certain point native advertisement is going to come to voat. I think it would be better if we created a subverse where companies could pay to advertise themselves openly, and provide users with some sort of discount or coupon. companies could pay a fat advertisement fee or some sort of per click schedule.
flat_hedgehog ago
Please not T-shirts. I don't wear them.
Non-intrusive ads would be great. Actually non-intrusive. I'm getting fed up of sites that ask me to turn off ad-block and promise their adverts and nice and then I get to see obscene Taboola clickbait.
Arotaes_Forgehammer ago
Bruh, I'm the one who's requesting /v/vaporwave.
Also, that one specific phrase is part of a somewhat long inside joke on IRC.
WhoFramedReaderRabit ago
@Atko if you go the ad route put a limit on the percent of ad revenue one person, company, or industry can buy. This prevent one company, industry, or person from influencing you financially.
Example 1: If Voat allowed Pharmaceutical ads that made up 70% of revenue, then one day the industry might decided they don't like Voat posting new articles critical of pharma drugs, so they say were going to stop advertising on Voat unless you start censoring your content.
Example 2: Domino's Pizza buy 50% of all the advertising on your site, your dependent on them for revenue, but then one day they say we don't like that Voat has a conspiracy, sub remove it or will stop advertising.
Example 3: Advertising company you rely on provides 63% of your ads, but then they say they want you to censor content about Muslim crime, or else they stop advertising. Which leave you in a bind.
If you limit the amount of ads one industry/person/company can buy to say 5 to 10% they won't be able to "twist your arm" into censorship.
Trash_Duchess ago
A Voat Goat plushie/t-shirt would be adorable...maybe if you donate a certain amount or something? Non-intrusive ads are really great too.
AlbinoStoic ago
USD$15,000/mo is a pretty high "Hosting" cost tbh, this site doesn't drive 1,000,000,000 daily visits, it's not an Alexa Top 10 ; there's no reason to need that many server(s) or extra service(s) unless the codebase is poorly optimized.
I run an Alexa 2.5m site for work, and we push 2,000,000 daily unique visitors on less than USD$1,400/mo worth of Amazon services. The site's content is entirely dynamic; and very close in format to voat (we use Teliscope, and MeteorJS ; a live data platform that uses much more bandwidth and CPU (server-side rendered) than a static platform (client side rendered) like Voat.))
All that being said, I hope Voat doesn't go anywhere, and you guys figure out some more ways to optimize. I heard the codebase was Open Source, so I'll be having a look at exactly what is unoptimized, and will feed back there (be it GitHub Issues or otherwise.)
4061552? ago
Considering the growth of the site has basically made the "report user" button a little too narrow (especially without a real way to kick spammers out permanently), one of the most important features that could still use some fixing would be the "block user" function (probably working similarly to the "block subverse" button, possibly a bit stronger than that, not sure).
Atko ago
5k. Not 15. For comparison, reddit is paying Cloudflare 5k/month for their enterprise plan (if not more, 5k is their starting price), we are paying 200. Voat is highly dynamic and almost everything is rendered server side (asp.net mvc with razor), but there is always room for improvement.
2 million daily unique visitors on less than 1.5k/month is something I would really love to see. Are you sure you did not mean daily page views? We push some 5 million daily pageviews.
TheRealAmalek ago
Thanks for all your good work!
TC10284 ago
I'd be happy to do a yearly or possibly monthly subscription.
Subtenko ago
Yall trust bitcoin to hold up n stuff still? Looked real promising at first but now idk whats going on with it or where its goinig and they talk about it being regulated soon. Was thinking about getting into it but it seemed like it was a waste of time mining bitcoins because it takes so long?
Idk Im trying to still wrap my head around it all
4053050? ago
It's a waste of time to mine them if you don't already have tens of thousands of upfront cash to buy the hardware.
Subtenko ago
Idk if the voat team is just atko and putitout but it would help if u split people into separate teams in different categorys ie. marketing, merch, content creators,average voat person, etc. That way ideas are organized.
I see this thread has 432 comments and thats gonna be a bit to read O_o and there were good ideas I saw in here when u first posted but I guess we're assuming everything is gonna be voated to the top too.
fackyuo ago
sell shares and make it community owned :)
kujda ago
How about bank transfers? I don't have paypal, nor bitcoing and would just like to donate money trhough a bank transfer. You could also establish some sort of possibility to pay a monthly fee for voat, which would allow some bonuses for those users who do.
smackdownfletch ago
Create a fresh bank account, link it to a bullshit LLC that the owners can create in any state, call it Vandalay Enterprises or something vague, and have Voat pay that company for "content aggregation" or something like that. Tons of large companies do things like this to get around liabilities and red tape. If you want to bullshit with the big dogs, you can play right along with them. When Paypal catches on 6 months to a year down the line. Close out the LLC, rinse, lather, repeat.
icemaze ago
I'd happily pay $1-2 per month to be able to voat, comment and save posts. It would also help with spam.
BustyChicksFTW ago
@Atko, don't know if you're going to read this, but here it goes:
NOW THIS IS KIND of an odd idea tbh. I seriously propose that Voat has their own subreddit with a crowd fund that will help fund a bitcoin mining machine. Yes, you heard me. We could donate to Atko/PutItOut so they can build a bitcoin mining enterprise. It would be the best thing so they can be self-sufficient. The subreddit will have biweekly updates on the number of videocards, the amount it costs to run, problems, etc. (Kind of like an odd video game). P.S. I don't mean something in grandma's basement. I mean literally a warehouse (small one to start) solely used for bitcoin mining. It's been done before. There's a guy that makes 8$M in bitcoins a month. We could also finance solar panels, etc. We could also help with choosing which are the best AMD cards for mining (Temperature, price, etc.) and whatnot.
Voat Goat for comments (same as Reddit Gold really tbh, I know we're copying but admittedly it works pretty well)
ad space in subverses that allow it as well as ad space in default subverses
volunteer subscription fee to become "VIP" which will remove all ads from the website and give us a badge (if we keep it for more than 6 months)
donate button that shows the amount donated (or not) - possible elitism that comes out of it though but that might actually help the website survive. The donation will show how many Voat Goats you gifted, if you're VIP, and a special rank depending on how much you donated in total. The rank takes into account subscription and Voat Goats. EX: (0, 10) = Citizen Goat, [10, 20) = Patriot, etc, etc. VIPs are allowed to have next to their username an pre-established icon of their choice on any subverse on the website (country's flag, a goat face, etc.)
Simple Voat merchandise (not clothes): Magnets, laptop stickers, BIG (like 16 oz) ceramic mugs with the voat goat on it, etc. Clothes work but let's face it, I'm not going to buy it and I don't know many that will. I'd totally buy little simple stupid things like laptop stickers, cool Voat posters (community contest for the design anyone?), etc.
P.S. We should have merchandise with this.
cat-facts ago
I agree with the others on allowing ads. As long as you don't go down the slippery slope of picking and choosing which content is appropriate you can simply say "We are just a platform that endorses no opinion but supports free speech much like the Internet and the United States at large. We don't stand behind opinions of voat subs or users we only provide a platform for open dialogue"
I think this puts advertisers in a place where they aren't forced to have to justify their decision to support the website. This is the same reason bittorrent is still around because it's just platform. This worked for reddit for a long time until they started filtering some legal content and at that point they became responsible for all content that was not removed sending them down a never ending path of "why is X removed but not Y?" as there will ALWAYS be someone offended by something once you go down that path.
I think there are advertisers that are willing to buck the safe space nonsense and advertise here.
Something I have brought up in the past with reddit is many times publishers will write a clickbait title and do a poor job of writing an article, load the page up with ads, and then way for people on reddit to drive piles of traffic their way and corrections and useful information ends up being in the comments rather than the publisher webpage which is often time some shitty block rather than the direct source. This seems like an unfair division of labor since social media users are doing a lot of the actual work and the blog writer is collecting the lions share of the ad revenue.
One method to get around this is to create a monetized publishing platform where people can create page layouts and attach images, monetize the article, and then submit the entry to reddit or voat rather than just filling out a text box. It gives people who curate and submit a lot of content a way to make money for the website through ad revenue on the article and maybe a way for the website to share back some revenue with those users as a reward if their content brings in a lot of revenue.
I was thinking about blogging on some topics I am into but I haven't decided on a platform to host it. I don't want to be a paid writer for someone but it would be cool if I could publish articles a month and get like 20% of whatever ad revenue my articles bring in. I would be doing it more to inform and educate than to make money but doing buzzfeed style "Top 25 reasons dogs are better than cats" type of articles would be really easy to create on such a platform.
Most articles that get written are done by professional writers that need to make money but as a hobbyist writing about things I am interested anyway it doesn't matter to me if I write a few articles a month and only make $20 a month. Sometimes sitting down to explain things in a blog post is easier than explaining concepts to multiple people individually on forums anyway.
It would be like an imgur for articles and some of the popular authors could probably bring in $1,000/month (or probably more) in ad revenue.
ECW ago
Just throw some ads in. You guys deserve it.
srven ago
i'd have no issues disabling adblock on this site as i have done now, and see a few ads, wouldn't be an issue providing they are not pop ups or invasive, sidebar would be a non issue
k3mist ago
Hey @Atko,
I don't have the time to read through all the comments so I am not sure if this was said or not. But what would really be nice once you get that merchant account in place is a subscription option. Have a recurring payment that the user decides from a drop down or something (3,5,10,20,25,50,etc,etc). This way, people can "subscribe" to the site by donating monthly without having to remember to do so.
For busy people like myself, this would be awesome.
Edit: make the default $5, a little over 1000 people subscribing at that number will cover most costs.
FuckReddit- ago
Can we do a 3 dollar monthly thing happen? I'll happily pay that amount.
Slayfire122 ago
I see you are well trained in the art of rap.
k3mist ago
I'm gonna send a link of his comment over to Kayne. You never know!
Slayfire122 ago
Don't you miss the days when an ad showed a beautiful mountain view with a guy riding a bike instead of a disruptive add with a boring picture of a bike.
BoringHusband ago
Sell me a subscription using Amazon payments.
craschnet ago
Can we get a paypal donation page?
RectalLeakage ago
Well, maybe a badge, but no special powers.
heili ago
The goat poop badge, and the only special privilege is no ads.
mistryla ago
I would be more than happy to cancel my TotalFark subscription and move that payment to this site. I agree with the ad free subscription idea and really think it's worth following up on.
forgetmyname ago
-> #5 voatcams.
forgetmyname ago
@atko pay $.50 to never see posts from this user again! [button]
forgetmyname ago
If the SQL license expires soon, it is imperative to get that postgres up so that cost can be mitigated.
Techman ago
I don't mind non-intrusive advertising, especially text ads. I always loved text ads.
Vvswiftvv17 ago
Wow! I had no idea it cost this much! @atko I would be willing to pay a subscription fee. I know that's a double edge sword. Depending on how many hundreds of thousands of users you have, 99 cents a username per year is pretty fair I think. It would also add a sense of legitimacy to this site. People who are flocking just to troll probably wouldn't take the time to signup and pay 99 cents. However, people who have been here for a while, and those who want to produce quality content would. This would also take away the advertisement trap of controlling content to met advertising demands. This way it truly is users who control it.
Edit: I would pay more than 99 cents BTW, I would probably pay $25 a year honestly. But you would need to do a cost model to figure out pricing points and at what point you are just shooting yourself in the foot.
ChillyHellion ago
Thanks!
Genial ago
I would sell my soul for goat plushies.
Scruffy_Nerfherder ago
My idea was 'paid' subscriptions. They would be free for a year but then you had to pay to renew it. You could always just grab another free subscription if you had too, but could keep your user name by paying for it.
ChillyHellion ago
Do you have any tips on where to start? I know you can generate your own bitcoins, but not many at a time unless you have very powerful hardware. If you want to buy them, you either have to put up with the red tape or buy them person-to-person, and finding someone you trust that's into bitcoin can be a stumbling block as well.
ChillyHellion ago
That's true, and I wonder how many people have bitcoin set up from the early days before the regulations came down, and just don't realize what's changed. I only tried two, but both places wanted my photo ID and access to my banking account.
ChillyHellion ago
Voat's implementation could be completely anonymous, just sending a PM to the user without visually distinguishing their comment in any way. It would flip Reddit's "look at me" culture on its head by motivating people with the good feeling you get by supporting charity and Voat at the same time, even if you don't get a special badge indicating your action.
GreatWhiteNorth ago
Please don't go ad supported. I'll gladly pay a few dollars a month to keep Voat going.
TahTahBur ago
@atko @puttitout I was thinking this the other day. The biggest thing will be to street away from reddits trap they got into that regular people may want to re-create (as that's what's defined Reddit in the end).
Idea board:
Create a zeen/repost of top articles in a cheap ass news print that people can subscribe to. Even if it's just sending a post card for $9.99 a month in the beginning. You can figure it out and order per-country shitty post cards to be sent. I will do that as long as it isn't linked via direct account.
Allow paypal donations? Edit: create shitty voat store called notvoat.co for downloading digital goods like shitty drawn horses
Use the /v/anontalk idea @fuzzywords_undeleted created for doxxing to make a secrete Santa shitty post//donation store? Almost like gambling a delivery system @ some user name post pic/idea to thread /v/idonatedagift (pings user anonymously and posts what ever they decide). So $2.99 a discussion, $3.99 a picture.
Create an idea board subverse for raising money. I'm sure you will get some crazy good ideas there.
ChillyHellion ago
How about a polo shirt with a goat silhouette instead of the polo logo?
ChillyHellion ago
I donated through PayPal before they froze Voat's account, then tried to setup a bitcoin account to donate. The difference was like night and day. I tried Coinbase and one other competitor (maybe Circle?) and both wanted more information than I was comfortable providing. Linking directly to my existing bank account, uploading a scan of my photo ID or license. I understand it's all information they're required to obtain for regulatory reasons, but it's definitely not as simple as it gets, especially when other payment methods are as simple as keying in a credit card number.
JustCallMeCam ago
Try the mycelium bitcoin wallet. Literally a few pieces of personal information and you're good to go.
ChillyHellion ago
Nice, I will have to look into this one
Empire_of_the_mind ago
I'd like to suggest avoiding inline ads, "intrusive" or not.
Advertising is inherently intrusive, and it's also a fickle business at the moment. There are many factors involved in setting this up, all of which open you up to potential problems. At a certain point you have to ask if the overhead is worthwhile.
One thing people forget is that ad networks are a security risk. Additionally, the proliferation of scripts that support them slows down websites and ruins the user experience. Finally, I'd expect that your userbase isn't a terrific target and won't be generating much cashflow for clickthroughs because we're not a bunch of retards.
I'd like to suggest PAID ACCOUNTS. But make it totally optional - and offer no additional features.
First of all - you have to decouple the payment process from the account, of course, as has been discussed prior. Someone makes a payment and selects the account they want to pay for and throw the records out.
Next, these accounts would be indicated in some way - a simple different color for the poster name would be fine. Offer these users absolutely nothing else. Naturally this would create a tiered user status, where inevitably people will consider "paid users" as more serious than random accounts, which may more easily be shown as trolls and sockpuppets.
Paid users should cost like $80/year, and be paid annually with no saved payment data so it has to be manually renewed. Keep a visible, running list somewhere showing all paid accounts and the date they paid, to guard against a data loss on that.
Finally, no fucking warranty. Pay your money, consider it a donation to Voat.co, and you get a pretty color on your username. If you lose your password or your user account goes to shit, tough luck. Non-transerrable.
The key is that you're offering NOTHING of substance. This way you have no expectation for delivery, no power users with any actual powers. It's glorified donations, and there are a few hundred of us that would probably sign up immediately.
The annual payments generate a large cash-flow, to be supplemented by random donations you'll accept for smaller amounts (no payment plans, no customer service - if you want a "paid" account you pay up front in full). Additionally you need to sell awesome shirts and coffee cups and such mersh - the design is key and as others have stated it should be understated. I'm picturing a cup with a darker shade of your default blue and a gray, faded out goat head. Rip-off the Lasko Pivo logo, man! PBS has done well for decades by throwing in a merch item for annual donations - if you need to reward paid users do it this way. I'll totally buy an $80 voat coffee cup.
I also really like the idea of letting people pay $10 to have a special sidebar post for a period of time. This would be hilarious, even if it was just a running banner saying "Nigger" for days on end. They're paying the bills, it's not integrated into the main post-flow, and we can have a designated /v for making fun of them, appreciating it, etc. I suspect you'll find far more serious posters who want to be heard than trolls if it costs money.
Are there a thousand people willing to pay you $80/per account to keep this site running? There just might be.
The medium is the message, and you've shown that you understand this well. Keep it that way - a site with no google analytics, no fucking ads, no special status for people with money. A lightweight site with no heavy scripts and no advertising business plan makes a statement and is a better place to spend one's time.
downvotesattractor ago
@Atko and @PuttitOut
Here are some ideas, some of these are going to be repeats of the other suggestions here.
Cutting Costs
Revenue sources
If you have further questions, please shoot me a PM. I'm happy to support you guys in any way I can.
Edit: Can you talk to CrunchyRoll and Pornhub and see if a voat-gold like service can be redeemed for points there. They take a cut, you take a cut, users are happy both gifting and receiving. Everyone wins
Empire_of_the_mind ago
because it's not?
Damndirtyape ago
This guy gets it. Its easy for those who have bitcoin accounts. But it does take some time to set up. I can see why most people would want to just do a credit card payment.
4044344? ago
I have no problem with non-intrusive ads. Also, Voat merchandise would be awesome.
4044332? ago
Unless they linked to phishing sites, but those would (hopefully) be rejected.
TuMamaEnTanga ago
I'm ready to make annual donations
niggersreggin ago
Id donate a ton if there was a real block user option
weezkitty ago
Just as long as it isn't required. I think ads for free users and a subscription to get rid of ads is a decent compromise.
ChillyHellion ago
Agreed! I think that's the best of both worlds. A free option that still funds Voat but allows the site to remain accessible and democratic for free, and a paid option for people who don't like ads and prefer to fund Voat directly. It's a tried and true model, as long as the advertisers don't get any clout over the site's function.
Dereliction ago
One of the largest websites on the net, Wikipedia, manages to get all it needs and more with quarterly donation drives. I feel confident that this would work for Voat. The users here have a vested interest in seeing it thrive. Ask, and they will give.
Don't complicate it with merchandise or "premium" accounts or other shit like that. Not necessary. Tell us what you need and keep up the transparency. Asking will work.
Somali ago
Goat + Trump tshirts
http://www.billygoattavern.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Goat_Trump.jpg
smackdownfletch ago
Voat gold, and add ads. Just code in a reminder to remind us ad blocking folks to add to whitelist.
4043579? ago
Create voat.ad it would be voat.co full of ads. Kinda puts the whole adblocker debate into perspective.
farmer- ago
Maybe we can start that partnership thing, eh atko? I would love to drive up activity with some new, spooky & spicy memes.
Scandinavian ago
This is why we can't have nice things.
omegletrollz ago
I think many users like me have a hard time contributing financially to Voat be it due to financial situation, difficulty with payment methods or even ideological issues against donating money or already donating to other institutions (maybe more honorable than a website, even if I love Voat!).
So my question would be - how can we help you in other ways than financially? You have a lot of willing manpower at your disposal if you ask for help - anything we can do to reduce operational costs, for example? Something that could be easily developed in Javascript, Python or whatever that you could easily adopt later on (especially after the new API comes out)? Anything in special that could be contributed to the core C# code? Is there someone we can as a large group come into contact with that could help us in any way?
I have contributed thousands of dollars in development time to open-source projects that I could not contribute financially to. Let me know if I can do anything that isn't C# since I don't have Windows installed and am a total noob with .NET programming.
You made it very clear that you need financial help but it's just not possible for a lot of us to help for different reasons. As the phrase goes time is money though and you are only 2 people running a big-ass website with huge operational costs. Let us know if there is anything we can help you with so that maybe you can focus on more important things with your own time.
If I was in a position to donate, which is not gonna happen soon I'd love to contribute with a monthly fee through an in-site method, PayPal or Patreon - even though I think none of these would be trivial for me to use since I don't have an international credit card and am not based on the US.
I think this is a necessity, unless you can greatly improve performance (and thus lower costs). I did a little math and it seems like every person who upvoated this post so far would have to contribute with ~60 dollars a month for you to close out even at the end of each month. That is a lot of good will right there, even more if you're depending on every single upvoater here to set up a subscription and pay for it for years on end.
I don't think it would be wise to let go of CloudFare though - without it Voat could as well been dead already! Chances are it will come in handy again.
Thanks for the best platform for discussion (and many other things) the Internet has to offer! Voat is in many ways the pinnacle of technological evolution up to this point - you're doing the good work and I wish us all the best of luck :)
RobotussinMcGibbs ago
Sounds like Voat is gonna need to get some gibs. Someone gib Voat gibs! There are many avenues to get gibs and Robotussin McGibbs only takes gibs but would consider gibbing some gibs to maintain this platform.
EdSnowden ago
I'd be fine paying a few bucks a month, I'm sure others would too.
emtpayislow ago
I would do a subscription. Is there a way to invest in voat? Buy a piece of the pie so to speak? User owned website type thing where you get shares? I dunno, it might be cool. Or not.
Fibbideh ago
I'M IN DELAWARE! :D
brody9311 ago
Hate to make this a circlejerk here, but I would just like to say thank you @Atko and @PuttitOut for all your hard work here. Without you guys none of us would be here.
Can't wait to see what the future holds.
smokratez ago
I don't care about voat's financial status. You are letting it turn into reddit. It will be dead within a year.
OhBlindOne ago
My opinion on ads is this (as alot of people are all for this idea) unless you're rock solid about advertising, Voat may end up just like that other place. The other place was all well and good until profits and ads got mixed in. Now it's just an ad farm, a business looking to make a profit and screw anyone who gets in the way of the bottom line.
I would honestly pay a monthly donation subscription to Voat just for a little badge next to my name that says I am a monthly donor, I don't need more than that.
I would honestly pay for no benefits, just to keep the site going. That's enough for me.
go1dfish ago
You can watch bitcoin donations here: https://blockchain.info/address/1BFqer7P9qqqiirbC63KqxfuZYXxk6RrBZ
OldTrux ago
I know it wouldn't be popular. I know it would be difficult, but have you considered forming a corporation of some form? I would love the opportunity to purchase a share of ownership. Especially if we did start having ads, the opportunity to share in potential profits and having a true investment would get me 100%. It also would allow people to have a reason to purchase and also to perhaps purchase at a larger percentage or amount. As an investor you may never make a dime, but you might.
un_salamandre ago
Voat Gold FFS!
TH3_1D10T ago
How many times are you going to post this comment?
Scandinavian ago
Hi Atti and Putt,
Here's my quick analysis, feel free to expand Voaters:
COMMERCIALIZATION VIABILITY
The demand for the service Voat, Inc. provides rests upon its commitment to free speech and community control; not its financial independence from commercial interests.
As long as Voat is completely transparent about its revenue, commercialization to a certain extent won't hurt Voat's credibility.
It's imperative to separate the hidden financial interests in similar services from transparent ones. Surely, quiet money is good money in the short run, but we should definitely be able to monetize Voat to an extent of $15,000/mo. without sacrificing transparency.
COMMERCIALIZATION OPTIONS
Voat has three overall revenue stream options:
A: Directly from users
B: From advertisers who pay to expose users to advertising messages.
C: Political or corporate sponsorships
Let's explore option A first:
OPTION A: DIRECT REVENUE FROM USERS
We can imagine a few models here:
A1 will severely restrict intake to Voat and it's a killer move, to be honest.
A2 can work in some forms, like Reddit Gold did to an extent - pay more, get more. Gold as a super-upvoat is a bit dishonest, but hey; it pays the servers.
A3 is interesting on its own, but only on a project-by-project basis. We could very well do donation drives (give users badges and flairs in return!), but they work best if targeted towards a goal.
In summary, a sort of freemium model could be implemented as a steady income stream. On top of this, donation drives towards specific goals could be held in exchange for symbolic tokens like badges.
However, as great as it would be, my qualified hypothesis is we can't keep Voat running ourselves. Not directly, at least.
OPTION B: ADVERTISING
This breaks down into:
B1 could be a steady revenue stream, while probably not enough to sustain Voat on its own (click-throughs would be bad and media space would not come at a premium due to the non-PC nature of Voat and the weak demand outside larger economies for niche media space.
Reddit successfully uses B2, but it would kill Voat at this stage - as it should, btw.
B3 would disrupt Voat as well, but I'm not sure about how it could be done. It would have to be clearly marked links - just one erroneous click by a user would lead to instant animosity towards Voat.
B4 would be an insta-kill to Voat as well with limited financial upside. Reddit has the size and VC payback demands - see the new privacy policy - but for Voat, it would pose a great risk for little reward.
In summary: Digital displays could bring a supporting source of steady income, but probably not enough to reach a sustainable financial model for Voat on its own.
OPTION C: POLITICAL OR CORPORATE SPONSORSHIPS
This option would require a political, ideological or corporate entity to agree to cover Voat's running costs up to and even beyond break-even.
Option C is very muddy, as it relies on some ideologically independent sponsor, who is willing to foot the bill without getting equity in exchange. The second equity is given en bloc is the second Voat loses its core value - an honest, free place to meet.
I don't see a viable road here, but please - if someone is more creative than me, speak up.
REVENUE MODEL
As cold as it sounds, Voat needs to deploy several tactics at once:
FINAL THOUGHT: LET'S OWN THIS TOGETHER
You could, all things going well, decide to 'go public' with Voat over the course of several months. You could offer up 49% of the equity in Voat for the users, but sell it in increments to keep prices sufficiently high. I'd easily value Voat's equity at a couple million at this point, provided I had full commitment from you founders.
It's worth thinking about, too. The dispersed ownership might give Voat financial ballast while providing a unique position for the site in the market - I mean, how great is that?
These are things to consider. Reach out if you want any elaborations.
/Scandinavian
TH3_1D10T ago
I'll have to read this latter, spotted some interesting ideas.
caelaorn ago
If you're a MS shop have you looked into Microsoft's Bizspark program?
I'd think they would jump at the chance to get what has the potential to be a huge user community advertised as being hosted on Azure.
DickHertz ago
I doubt they would jump when they see the content.
pyres ago
Hats, bumper stickers, Coffee Mugs, t-shirts and baseball bats (for those fighting refugees) with the voat logo.
go1dfish ago
Yeah couchbase includes the entire dataset in memcache and eventually persists to disk.
Memcache is a great tool for caching in general, not sure if it's an option on microsoft systems though.
ChillyHellion ago
@Atko, what do you think of this suggestion for monetizing Voat? Basically users are able to select a favorite charity on their profile page, and other users can "tip" their helpful/insightful comments to benefit that charity, with the understanding that the money tipped is shared 50% with Voat and 50% with the charity (or 100% with Voat if the tipped user doesn't have a charity selected).
Tipped comments wouldn't need any kind of visual indicator, just a PM sent to the tipped user to let them know a donation has been made to their chosen charity as well as used to support Voat directly. It would be good PR for Voat to be a constant source of charity support, it would provide a funding option for Voat in a way that doesn't mess with comment rankings, and people could feel good about supporting their favorite charities through Voat.
The only caveat would be that you'd have to somehow vet charities to avoid paying money to "ChillyHellion's gaming fund" or similar setups, but I know Amazon's Smile program already has some kind of system set up (a portion of your purchases on Amazon go to your own selected charity). It might be possible for Voat to mimic this kind of setup in its own way using publicly available charity information.
Super_Cooper ago
I'm willing to fund this site however you choose. As long as free speech is protected, I will support it.
hijinked ago
Ask Protein World to advertise here. I'm sure they like us.
dchem ago
I will definitely buy voat goodies once they become available.
Subtenko ago
This makes me think of something done back in school....it was like a bake sale or something.
mudcatca ago
We should have VoatCoin, with a 1% exchange fee back to Bitcoins or currency to fund Voat
skymod ago
Most voaters seem to welcome non-intrusive ads. I will gladly turn off my ublock for you guys :)
Subtenko ago
hm...theres that too... :/ still theres other ways than ads tho.
kltpzyxm ago
You could sell Voat brand merchandise with pics of little Goatie (does the goat have a real name)? I'd kill for a 'im checking your bits' hoodie.
There are companies that make small as order batches so you wouldnt need to pay for all the merch up front.
Subtenko ago
You can put non-instrusive ads (pllllz make sure they arent shady malintent ads) Theres many other ways to cover cost without ads tho even if people hate non intrusive ads.
Have people help you with: merch, sites, code, finances.
Theres a whole ton of people here good and different stuff atko. No matter how big or small if we all combine our efforts and have a plan directed by you we'll be goaten (golden) :p
edit: btw I pm'd u atko about goat.video
sakuramboo ago
I would gladly toss Voat 100 bucks a year if there was also some incentive, like no CCP restriction for downvoats, or 25 subverses that I could mod, or 5 alt's can I can create from the same IP address.
Feeds_On_Vegans ago
I'm not in favour of an ad model. While it would generate revenue, it would also change the fundamental character of the site. If it comes to it, so be it - I'd unblock for voat, but I really hope not.
I think a reliable way to donate, particularly subscriptions is the key. Steady and predicable stream of revenue is necessary so that you're not worrying from month to month whether you'll make rent. Paypal clearly didn't work out so well. Patron is having great success in the podcasting world, I'd say give it a try. They do take a cut, but it's a reasonably trusted platform that would take the payment burden off you so you could focus on the real work.
Sadly, you'd probably have to go "Jimmy Wales" on us once in a while, shilling for money, but I think you'll be surprised how many users would pony up to keep the site funded and unsullied by an ad model.
shmegegy ago
so $0,10/month per user? I''m in.
aileron_ron ago
Not long ago twit.tv started asking for donations to buy everything to start a new streaming TV station. Contact them and see how they did it. I for one would donate money and yes to non-intrusive sidebar ads.
Foralltoosee ago
Could you start up a funding page on something like patreon that would allow us to basically subscribe to Voat? If you did something like this soon, you could see how well it worked before your current funds ran out and figure out if this would be viable before falling to the side-bar ad alternative. The numbers they have up look promising, as you would (hopefully) get a decent sized batch of us willing to sign up so that this place doesn't need to make any changes to suit the tastes of advertisers.
FlapjackWindChimes ago
Whatever happened to the warrant canary?
foxel ago
I'd pitch in to keep voat up, but there needs to be an easy and a straight forward way to do this
OmicronPersei8 ago
Give people flair next to their name if they contribute on a monthly basis. Have different levels, 5/20/100 per month billy goat/mountain goat/ etc
priva ago
I think running this site with only donations is little problematic. Is the active user base who donates big enough to cover the expenses? I don't think I'm prepared to donate more than max $12/year for this site and there are probably many who don't want to donate at all. I think you should consider ads.
zak_the_mac ago
I've tried to donate before, but gotten confused as to how to do it. What I'd like is a big 'DONATE' button at the side, that takes you to a page where it explains clearly how I can send you money. It shouldn't assume I have a bitcoin account, and if I need one to donate, a link to a trustworthy page where I can make one would be useful.
I prefer not to see ads, but I don't mind paying for valuable stuff online. And I value Voat, so please let me give you money!
Quadling ago
So a diversified suite of recurring revenue products and services is probably the best bet. Some people would like to donate, some would like to buy shirts and merch, some would like to tip others. However, each of these things will take developer, project management, and testing/QA time. So my suggestion would be this. If @atko and @puttitout are ok with it, create a list of paths. each path would be one of the items I listed above, and some I no doubt missed. For the next couple of months, let people donate money to whichever path they wish to use/see put into effect. The money can be used to hire developers to build that functionality. Enough people donate, it gets built. Not enough people donate, it hibernates till someone gets annoyed, and wants it built. Function Bounties. My $.02. Hope you don't mind.
rosary505 ago
Let /v/letsdraw and other artistic subs come up with a rad design for you to use if you do decide to sell merch.
Thread here: https://voat.co/v/letsdraw/comments/815426
neonneophyte ago
a highly visible donate button. my favorite private torrent tracking site has been surviving for over a decade that way.
fagnig ago
Like something tshirt worthy? Cant wait
big_fat_dangus ago
Is there a way to make a regular, scheduled donation? I'd be up for it.
omegletrollz ago
A Patreon page, perhaps?
ilovepussy ago
The way I see it, Ads by Sub-verse is about the only way this can work long term.
Donations - Sure, donations can bring some revenue, but it is not consistent, and is pretty much totally dependent on the community. Only a fraction will donate, and then only once or twice. Some will do reoccurring, but not enough IMHO.
Sell stuff - I'd buy a T-Shirt, a mug, maybe even a bumper sticker, but beyond that, I'm not going to be buying stuff every month. Plus, running a store is a pain in the ass, and @Atko or @Puttitout probably do not have the time to devote to a store.
General Advertising. Front page, maybe, but only if @Atko and @Puttitout are willing to filter the front page, and that's where that other site ended up having major issues. I'm sure many advertisers are not interested in having @hecho posts or the MH101 trolls next to their products.
So this leaves Ads by Sub-verse. Let the advertisers decide which sub-verses they are willing to place ads, and lets the chips fall where they may. I could see Vivid wanting to have ads on the NSFW subs, and HP or Dell wanting ads in Technology subs.
Just my 2 cents
crashtestgenius ago
I think making some t-shirts for a few specific subverses or monthly designs would help to keep people buying. If you look at what tek syndicate does, they have a t-shirt of the month, plus they come out with new designs fairly often. If these were created by the community, that would make it even better.
Harvo ago
Allow People (namely me) to invest in an equity stake.
dirkgently ago
Thanks @atko and @putitout for all the hard work and info, you guys have been great. My ideas...
T-shirts, mugs, etc. You don't have time for that shit so hire with some ambition like the shirtwascash guys to do it. he/they gets a cut to help do the work and you get money, the merch sales stay fresh and the money keeps flowing.
Mother Fucking Patreon. We both know reoccurring payments are where it's at and while I am not sure if Patreon will be dicks because of certain subs, its a good solution for re-occurring payments.
Your own version of gold. Maybe Voat Goats or something where the users can buy this for other users who do something good, post good content, etc. They could get a custom goat avatar, access to special subs, some flair, etc when a user gets it.
Ads, I fucking hate them but they help pay the bills and a part of life. Set that shit up.
I'm going to say no on have subscription based site, making it as voluntary as possible is the way to go. You will find your core users will be generous enough along with ads, voat goats, and merch, you should be able to cover your costs and maybe make some money.
-DG
Aducknamedjoe ago
Voat logo on 80% AR15 lowers.
knightwarrior41 ago
sorry but i think i wouldnt pay a dime for posting something on a message board like this.i'm already burdened with having to pay to my isp for my internet. i think that ads could be the way to go as long is a reputable ad agency that doesnt like to inject malaware in to their adverts.other than that i wish atko and co. good luck in their endeavors
p s: wouldnt mind the ability of people to donate freely as well
rwbj ago
So $5k a month. That works out to about $166 per day. Here's a really simple idea: for $10 you get to create a post up to 'x' words that's displayed on the sidebar and visible to every single person on Voat - for one hour. Self promotion, subverse promotion, rants, and amateurism in general obviously fully encouraged. Basically you're making a post that everybody will see. That's cheap enough that I think you'd have no trouble whatsoever filling it out and may even have to turn down people who want to buy up too many hours. A full month's booking works out to be $7,200 in revenue for Voat.
Keep it fun and simple. So no special rates relative to display time for instance. If somebody gets stuck at 4am (relative to voat primetime) sorry - buy another slot, it's only $10! And only display what time the ad will be shown once the person has paid. The touchy issue would be what's allowed content wise. The racist folk would line up from here until next year to be able to have a racist rant viewed by every single voater at $10/hour, so you'll have to make some decisions that are going to end up with people upset either way you go - but aside from that this seems like a simple and all but guaranteed way to keep Voat a truckin and even make a few bucks for you guys that started the show.
Spear1000 ago
This is by far the best idea. I would use the shit out of this.
4053011? ago
I don't think this will work for voat being a free speech platform. You can't not let someone post something just because people will be offended by the content.
SWIMsfriend ago
perfect idea, just double the price and its great*
*there clearly won't be a full month's booking each month, so i'd rather they have a cushion, so even if its only 1/3rd booked they still break even.
xklevin1 ago
Coke ads, Pepsi ads and so on and so on
Gill6150 ago
by far my favorite here, I think if racist comments get up. They get taken down, with no refund. They lose out on their hour plus the 10 bucks.
JustCallMeCam ago
I think that rather than this, maybe there be a button that says that you want to hide the message that is up, and it just hides it. Relative to the amount of people online, if enough people choose to hide it or vote to take it down or whatever, say 2/3 of people, then it gets taken down. This is much better than a single or two people being in charge of what is fit to be shown, and if you don't like it you can just hide it.
Gill6150 ago
Much better idea, love it.
frankenmine ago
Voat is dedicated to free speech. I think you are looking for safespace dot com.
Gill6150 ago
Racism should not fall under free speech.
Loumedia ago
Mouth breather.
frankenmine ago
Unfortunately for you, it does, and it will continue to for as long as we all live. Get used to it.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/05/07/no-theres-no-hate-speech-exception-to-the-first-amendment/
Gill6150 ago
I didn't mean that's what the first amendment says. That's my personal opinion. If you're okay with racism in any form, you are a terrible person. (Not saying you directly, just saying in general.)
jeegte12 ago
i disagree with this, but fine, whatever. this is where it becomes an issue:
that is 100% dead wrong. you don't get to decide what free speech is. that's the entire fucking point of free speech.
Gill6150 ago
Should be, as in That's what i think. All these down votes because of my opinion isn't really warranted.
jeegte12 ago
that's not an opinion. that's a prescription, and it's wrong. everything should fall under free speech, so men like you and i can't decide what other people get to say. i'd love for SJWs to stop talking out of their ass, but i'd never say that they shouldn't be allowed to say those things. that's blatantly evil.
Gill6150 ago
It's blatantly evil to be okay with racism.
Elcycs ago
jeegte12 ago
i wouldn't say it's blatant. i'd say probably evil, yes, depending on how you define "racism."
Gill6150 ago
That's my main opinion. I'm not okay with racism, Got a lot of hate just for that.
jeegte12 ago
i hope you're not referring to your downvotes here, because i can assure you those came from the fact that you're trying to prescribe allowable speech, which should always be reviled.
Gill6150 ago
I guess I can see where that makes the majority of Voat angry, Wasn't my goal. but in the long run. Racism & hate speech isn't really free speech?
jeegte12 ago
how are you not getting this?
why do you get to decide what free speech is? why can't every man decide for himself what they should be allowed to say?
frankenmine ago
You made a universal statement. That is more than personal opinion. It is a claim of fact and it is wrong.
You are against arguably the most fundamental human right there is, the right to free speech. You are a terrible person. Saying you directly.
Gill6150 ago
I made a statement about my opinion.
frankenmine ago
No, you didn't. Your statement is right up there. We can all see it. And you are still lying about it. Holy fuck, you're shameless.
Gill6150 ago
My statement does not say anything to suggest one way or another. No way for you to know my intent on the subject. I told you, then you call me a liar. I'm not sure what you mean.
thesuperpapagai ago
Because it doesn't matter how much proof you produce or how good your arguments are, you argument is automatically invalidated and should never be heard by anyone just because someone called it racist.
jeegte12 ago
of course it does. it absolutely does. are you a troll?
homosexuals_are_gay ago
Fuck you liberal
Dumb_Comment_Bot ago
Hey man, I'm the dumb comment bot, not you!
ChillyHellion ago
Sounds good! I'm not sure how helpful I can be at the designing/merchandising part of things, but it is a neat idea.
And that's great to hear, I hope everything goes smoothly and congratulations on being homeward bound :)
guinness2 ago
Show donations as a heart icon against the user's name
I've noticed that some users have donated cash and it shows up as an icon when viewing their profile... however I think it would be a far better form of advertising and use of people's pride if a little heart appeared next to their username... to prove they are a better quality of person than everyone else. It would also advertise the fact that people can donate. Hyperlink the heart icon directly to the donations page.
Reddit Gold
What's wrong with a Reddit Gold style service that only lasts a few months?
It's not a once-off purchase and it won't necessarily require any additional functionality beyond adding a tiny icon to the person's user name.
Make it just like my first suggestion, with a visible icon that users can click that will take 'em directly to the purchase page... but set a window of a few months before it expires.
Annual drive
Set a special date (perhaps over two days to accommodate users from all over the globe), once a year, and have a funds raising day to pay for Voat servers. Is there some way you can display a bar at the top of every Voat page that shows progress to the next milestone, with a big "Donate" button? In keeping with my other two "icon" suggestions, perhaps entice users with a special "Voat Day" icon (perhaps a crown) that will be displayed against their username for the next 11 months... if they donate on that day / days?
Static advertising
Also, if you were forced to display static adverts as a source of income, consider allowing people who really love Voat to increase the number of ads displayed on each window. Yeah, it's not ideal, however I'd be more than willing to max-out that setting and display an ugly amount of ads... if it meant that Voat would remain financially viable.
Charity service
I noticed that many Reddit pages used to have periodic charity drives for various reasons... (especially /r/Islam who promoted "charity" through the Islamic Relief "charity" with global links to terrorism funding). Perhaps Voat could provide all subverses with a similar service... except skim the top to pay to keep the servers running? You'd need to find a way to make that sound moral though... perhaps by calling it an "administration fee"?
Themed functionality for subverses... a bit like how the Google logo changes for specific dates
The recent Christmas snow theme looked really nice on /v/News... what with the snowing etc. Perhaps such functionality for specific occasions could be purchased for the various subverses? Perhaps the mods and the users could pay to spread the Christmas cheer, Easter, subverse-cake-day, moon landing, Australia Day (and other Nationalistic dates). Allow users to code and upload their contributions to a gallery that other users can purchase a once-off theme from for a few dollars. I'm unsure if this would raise much cash, but I suspect clever people would be willing to show-off their skills by freely donating to the available themes for rent.
Voat shop with mugs, t-shirts, sticker etc.
I've seen this in lots of web stores, but I have no idea if anybody purchases such stuff... felt compelled to mention it anyhoo.
Atko ago
I already looked at PostgreSQL and it sure looks like a good direction to take. SQL is by far the biggest cost we have right now and we can definitely cut our costs by going this route.
Long term plans? I find it increasingly difficult to find uneditorialized/unfiltered sources of information and places where people can say what they want. Big "players" are censoring content as instructed by various governments (for example Twitter reactively withholds content from users in a specific country, source: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20169222?lang=en) and comments on news articles have almost disappeared from Swedish web. Imagine going to a bar and getting a piece of silver tape over your mouth as you enter the bar... That's what the web seems to have become. If someone out there wants to have their voice heard without having to fear the consequences (for example political pressure which I personally experienced), platforms like Voat are probably their best option. Both me and PuttItOut are together on this one - and we will do everything we can to keep Voat alive, for as long as people want to use it.
notacylon85 ago
And my axe!
4044186? ago
You're a hero, Atko. PuttItOut too. It's plain and simple. The two of you aren't just standing, you're fighting for this cause that so many of the "powerful" out there want to quench. The userbase of this website is willing to fight, too.
If it gets to the point where advertisements become necessary to support Voat financially, I think the majority of us will be fine with that "last resort". That said, if you could find some way of donation easier to use than Bitcoin, I am also confident a good many of us would be willing to pay small monthly fees (which would amount to a great deal if enough of us contributed in that way).
From reading replies on this thread and others before now, that is the impression I get. If I could pay through PayPal or even just with a credit card, I would donate every month, perhaps as much as $10 monthly. Perhaps more (not that it would take that much if enough of us chipped in). Voat means a lot to me, as I know it means a lot to others. The entirety of the digital world is being censored and locked down, manipulated, sold out, used as propaganda engines, you name it. Except for Voat.
Keep up the good fight, guys. One way or another we'll fund this beast.
go1dfish ago
I'll second the recommendation for PostgreSQL but it might also be worth looking into a key->value store with eventual consistency instead since something like Voat is more write heavy than what SQL is typically optimized for.
I've seen couchbase do wonders with crazy amounts of data.
If you do stick with SQL I'd probably recommend getting more aggressive about caching result sets.
DKSArt ago
Start displaying adds. Maybe even offer a fee to remove adds from page for people who dont want to see them. Also maybe even have a subverse just for promotions and charge people to post in it. So if someone/company wants to promote a product they make a post in the promotional subverse and you get paid and maybe even charge extra to make it a sticky on the front page for 24 hours or something like that. I guess you would have to limit this to maybe 1 sticky per 24 hours incase you get alot of people who want to advertise... so the whole front page is nothing but paid for stickies ;-p.... if you want to stay in business you have to make profit, people will understand if you sell out a bit ;)
luckyguy ago
Make a cff.voat.co (cloudflare free) that requires a premium account. I'll pay a couple bucks a month to disable that thing. Bitcoin though. You don't want to have to handle credit card data and I don't want to give it to you and paypal's being a bitch.
wuzizname ago
Subtenko ago
I kinda like the lotto thing becuz it seems a bit unique and because someone mentioned a tipping share.
ie. if voat takes 20% of a dollar instead of 10% then that extra just goes towards a lotto. the user could choose to keep it or donate it back to voat (any option is fine, no discrimination)
go1dfish ago
A lotto would be great, but they are illegal pretty much everywhere because government hates competition.
Subtenko ago
Never have read up on this. giveaways must be excluded. So if they can do it in the form of a giveaway maybe thats an option, or even a giveaway of a merch trinket.
middleman79 ago
Who do we contact and how, if we have ideas and help to keep you online?
ChillyHellion ago
That could end up being really cool :) I feel like even though I love Voat as a whole, /v/gaming is really my home, and I wonder how many voaters feel the same about their favorite sub. Why not allow users to create their own designs, donate designs to Voat, and that way you'd have two benefits:
On top of that, if someone asks me what Voat is, I can probably give a good explanation. But if someone asks me what /v/gaming is, it allows me to segue more clearly into what Voat is in terms of subcommunities: "It's the best gaming-focused discussion and news community on the internet, and part of a number of communities on Voat.co"
cyks ago
This is you
Question_Authority ago
I will happily cancel my reddit gold for Voat ! .. Instead of Voat gold, can i just get shitlord status?
Subtenko ago
voat milk?
Ariastrasza ago
I would not mind some adds. as long as there are no auto play videos.
novictim ago
"we will obviously need your help to stay online. "
You got it, Atko. When the bank situation is clear, provide the link for us to donate without Paypal blocking us.
Lag-wagon ago
Bake-off ... I'll make the cupcakes.
G4 ago
If you opened back up Bitcoin donations, I would gladly give you guys half of the Bitcoin I produce.
Keep fighting the good fight guys.
go1dfish ago
The address is still listed on the about page:
https://voat.co/about
https://blockchain.info/address/1BFqer7P9qqqiirbC63KqxfuZYXxk6RrBZ
G4 ago
I've given coin to that address before, never got the donor thing on my account for it. I wonder if it's actually under their control still or if they just haven't updated the address
go1dfish ago
Did you tell them about it? There is no way to link a bitcoin donation to your account unless you tell them about it. I've donated some as well.
@Atko mentions "We have some 21k in bitcoin" in this post which matches up to the USD value of that address so I assume that yes they do still have control over it.
G4 ago
Oh yeah, I probably should have checked the wallet amount. When I sent them the money, I sent a message along with it, but that might be exclusively a Coinbase thing. I'll let them know.
fagnig ago
Under the heading Donations. go1dfish is right, but it could be a lie in general, go to the source.
go1dfish ago
By this fagnig means that I could lie about what the address was to steal donations myself, this is why I originally just linked to the about page so that you can confirm the address from a Voat controlled page.
fagnig ago
Just idiotproofing it bud
go1dfish ago
If they were just like sticky links the community could even comment on them to warn if there were any problems.
FriedFood100 ago
@Atko ...Maybe think about getting someone to implement a tipping system so users could tip other users for comments, posts, contributions, etc. and Voat.co would get a % of each tip.
Al_Rubyx ago
Wow this is such a good idea I forgot mine. Fuck.
SandorClegane ago
Sounds too reddit-y. Maybe make a character limit so you don't get people flooding something dumb like "Am I the only one that dislikes this series?" with "gold."
the-niceguy had something like that before it became possible to pay out themselves, and those posts went in the "Best of..." forum.
LostGener ago
This
Giraffricana ago
Genius. 75% to the user, 25% to VOAT. Just beware the number of people stealing content and ideas from other people could become a huge issue.
TheSafeWasALie ago
So twitch style?
Doofenshmirtz ago
Reminds me of the useless steam cards. I like that.
fr33europe ago
Amazing
jeegte12 ago
this is one of the most powerful ways to ensure circlejerks. you will kill original content this way. why post something interesting and controversial when you can post something not interesting but that people will tip you for?
FriedFood100 ago
We could still downvote lame posts so that they get nowhere.
go1dfish ago
I'd love to see a site sponsored tipping system, @putitout if you are interested in exploring this option I bet http://changetip.com would be more than willing to help integrate their stuff here.
Scandinavian ago
You missed a -t in Puttitout for your tag to work, buddy.
Subtenko ago
not bad, its something. tip someone a doller, voat gets 50cents or w/e.
I think something like merch should come first tho maybe
ChillyHellion ago
What do you think about allowing users to pick a favorite charity in their profile page, and tipped comments would contribute a portion to Voat and the rest to the chosen charity? It wouldn't need to visually mark the comment like Reddit Gold does, just give the tipped user a PM indicating that their comment was tipped and their chosen charity received a small donation in addition to directly supporting Voat.
Edit: The idea was originally from /u/GreffeDuFoie's suggestion in /v/IdeasForVoat
UncontrollableSphere ago
I think it would make more sense the other way around. I give you a tip because I want to super-upvoat your post. You only get a blingy icon, while Voat and a charity of my choice gets the actual money. That way I don't have to check to make sure your preferred charity isn't, like, the KKK or something.
Or Voat can offer a choice of well-rated charities to choose from.
ChillyHellion ago
That's a really good point, I can see it working well that way. I see it as "your comment was insightful, so I want to reward you indirectly by contributing to your named charity", but you have a good point. I think having people "tip" comments by contributing to Voat + their own named charity would be just as much an incentive to contribute.
Edit:
This might be the best way to get an idea like this off the ground, actually. I think it's important to have an element of personal choice to encourage people to use the system, but having 10-20 diverse options would probably be plenty to start with.
FriedFood100 ago
I think that's putting the cart before the horse. The first focus should be getting Voat financially stable. Maybe down the line something like that could be implemented, but I don't think now is the time to be concerned with that.
ChillyHellion ago
I'd say at worst it's paying a bill with pennies when you're looking for dollars. It might only be a drop in the bucket, but it would be more than zero, which Voat really needs right now. Even if the charity portion is scrapped, being able to tip users like you mentioned is a great idea; the charity portion just adds a few things into the mix:
I agree that a simple direct donation system is the necessary first step, but since we're talking about variations of that system, this could be a worthwhile addition in the long run.
Scandinavian ago
Only on Voat do I find myself upvoating the whole comment thread because both sides make good arguments.
ChillyHellion ago
Also pinging /u/FriedFood100 in on your comment since it's very much a compliment to him as well. Thanks for commenting!
FriedFood100 ago
Cheers to you & @Scandanavian
ChillyHellion ago
And it's voaters like you who recognize the merit of both sides that make this a great community. I've always said that Voat's greatest community asset is the ability to disagree respectfully - it allows for cheerful dissent and keeps this place from being an echo chamber - but it's more than that; voaters also seeing the merit on both sides of a discussion keeps either side from being buried just because of majority disagreement. A lot of the time a best fit solution lies somewhere in the middle, or a debated issue may have more than one factor to consider. It's this kind of intellectual honesty that keeps me coming back for more each day.
FriedFood100 ago
Seems like a good idea in the long run.
0ed ago
The greatest problem with this is that every user would then have to get a bitcoin wallet or something. And not every user would be willing to do that - it seems like a lot of hassle for a site where you can post shit and have fun.
Another potential problem that I can forsee is that, if Voat ever strikes it big, money-driven power users might become a thing. I'm not sure that they'd be a terrible idea yet - because honestly, if their desire for money gives us better content, it might actually be a good thing - but there's some tiny alarm bell warning against the idea of a monetized userbase that I can't really understand yet.
Perhaps I am simply afraid that monetary incentives will corrupt the original incentives to go on Voat - that Voat will become a place where the aim is to get tips instead of having fun.
umpaloompa ago
Maybe it will become a hugbox like reddit where everyone competes to get gold.
FriedFood100 ago
Valid points, I'd tip you if I could. ;)
SilverBanana ago
What a great idea!
ThisIsCathartic ago
This is one of the best answers, if not the best. Voat wants original content. There are so many ways to make this work.
@Atko, you know what you're doing but please consider looking into this if you haven't already.
4044354? ago
They have that partner thing on trial still, no? Not the exact same concept, but it's similar.
51rH0n3y84d93r ago
This would be better than ads.
Kubrick_Stare ago
I love this site and I want it to thrive because it really is a great place for sharing and discussing. I'm not really business savvy but what about getting more investors to be partners with you? Maybe sell ad space like others have mentioned or have something like an award or badge system where a user can buy to give to another user for a great comment or post? Those are just some ideas. I'm also willing to donate or help any way I can :)
RedditIsPropaganda23 ago
Is there any way we can reduce these costs?
Atko ago
I already looked at PostgreSQL and it sure looks like a good direction to take. SQL is by far the biggest cost we have right now.
go1dfish ago
https://blockchain.info/address/1BFqer7P9qqqiirbC63KqxfuZYXxk6RrBZ
TheDude2 ago
Find a way to monetize the voat platform as a service.
Sell websites that work just like voat, but don't require any level of nerd to set them up and use them. Hell, make it a monthly service that people can use to promote events and then it deletes itself. Have an add-on that advertises those sites on voat.co (in a very clear and non-sneaky reddit way)
Official_ISIS ago
I would unblock voat on adguard.
4040272? ago
Maybe you can offer a paid membership tier, where for $5 a month a user gets some special flair and access to beta features. I'd pay for that if only to support Voat.
notacylon85 ago
Thank you for letting us know what is going on! I'd definitely rock Voat swag if it could help.
LetsBeNakedOutside ago
I would love what another voater suggested- do the equivalent of Reddit gold, but have a portion of the proceeds go to various goat-related charities.
One month it could be buying goats to help rural farmers around the world, the next month could be an animal sanctuary that helps out goats, you get the idea. As a community, we could suggest where/which charities could be nominated.
I'm not saying that all of the money has to go to it, but maybe 5%?
Also I'm dying for some Voat shirt options!
idk ago
I really don't like the idea of a gold system, it rewards reposts and shitty puns.
go1dfish ago
Cloud flare provides more services besides DDoS protection like caching and CDN.
Voat is still using cloud flare, just not the DDoS protection.
I_like_paint ago
Far out
Boukert ago
Good to see you guys taking voat to the next level! It is much appreciated.
We have been discussing voat's financial issues in the modernpowers irc over the last few months and have been bouncing ideas of each-other to see what we could add for voat. We have been looking into reoccurring merchandising actions and have a financier willing to pre invest once plans are solid. We would love to discuss our ideas and opportunities with you and @puttitout.
You can find myself, @PM_ME_YOUR_ARCHES or @Gill6150 in the irc channel most of the time.
https://kiwiirc.com/client/irc.goat.chat:+6697#modernpowers
On behalf of /v/modernpowers we love what your doing and keep voat strong!
p.s we would really appreciate better search options and an extra sticky as options but that's another matter
Elcycs ago
Ah, I remember him from this very thread. The guy on voat that doesn't believe in or understand free speech. Better be careful on the IRC channel. Might say something that Gill won't allow.
Why are you hanging around with people like that?
Gill6150 ago
Cause they are mature, and can be around people who have differing opinions. btw, never said i don't believe in free speech. Just don't agree with Racism
Boukert ago
@Elcycs ^ this and cause he is a good guy. If ppl do not agree with you it doesn't mean they are against free speech, This is the rhetoric of a 5 year old.
Elcycs ago
He basically flat out said it. Doesn't require rhetoric beyond that of a 5 year old to quote a guy.
I'm no big fan of racism either. Allowing people to saying things you disagree with is the cost we must pay.
Gill6150 ago
Wow I'm late but busy. Key word 'should'
Gill6150 ago
Thanks for the support bk.
Gill6150 ago
I've been busy with life, so usually not in the irc. Boukert can relay any message to me if needed, i'll try to be on more though.
721r ago
Ads which depend only on page content are okay with me (without personalization or tracking). Also I'm okay with coarse-grained ad personalization ("choose ad themes you are interested in" in account options).
pembo210 ago
A 280px sidebar pic could work. It would probably need an "allow on NSFW subs" option, or even a "show only on NSFW subs" option too.
I would also love to get some goat merchandise. Thanks again for all your hard work.
ChillyHellion ago
I appreciate the transparency! I know this is a huge project for two individuals to spearhead alone, so I don't think any of us expect it to be handled perfectly, just openly and with the best of your ability. You're both doing a great job with something that few people would be brave enough to attempt, so I hope you and /u/PuttitOut know you're appreciated even if you don't feel appreciated every day on Voat. Thanks for the update, and for all the work you do on Voat.
goatboy ago
Make it easy to take our money.
Tecktonik ago
Such a simple idea that seems to mystify businesses around the world.
Stavon ago
If you find the time, you could offer users to buy or crowdfund for new features. If the price is high enough to pay for the work and for hosting.
omegletrollz ago
This is a good but treacherous idea. With enough money someone could start steering the site into a direction or another by choosing features. If it is well thought-out (for example people can't just suggest any feature they want, for startes) then it would be great and if it's a free-for-all then it could be Voat's demise.
But to be honest, between that and Voat shutting down for lack of funds I'd rather we try.
Stavon ago
I was more thinking about Atko and PuttitOut defining features and costs. Treacherous features could be sent today by pull request but I doubt that will be a problem, or the new feature will be taken down again. I don't see it as a problem, more like a solution, by getting improved what the community wants. I'm aware such a thing is gonna be hard and isn't tried much but I still hate spam on sites I try to like. It's not like sidebar spam wouldn't make claim spammers that spam posts are acceptable.
We could also pay for Voat to move to platforms which won't cost licence fees every month, it would be a win in the long run.
omegletrollz ago
I agree largely with everything you say but whenever money comes in tied with the the future of the website it opens the potential for big players to direct the evolution of the site. And trust me: there a few players out there that don't think about money in the way we do - for them a hundred thousand dollars to disable a website in one way or another is literally insignificant. Not even worth taking a note of - so why not do it?
I know I'm being paranoid but that doesn't mean I'm wrong at all - you have but to look at reddit to see how in-bound money changes a community. But as I said that is still a lot better than shutting Voat down.
TH3_1D10T ago
Hopefully this means we can start donating again.
NedTaggart ago
I am cool with non intrusive ads. I would also be willing to may a small subscription service, if you guys could work up some cool functionality.
Fooj ago
Voat T-shirts. Just put the goat on it. User submitted designs and polls to choose what to sell would also be pretty cool.
Somebody more dedicated than myself should definitely jump the gun on this.
Al_Rubyx ago
Yeah this was what I thought would be cool. Shop.voat.co or something with cool voat merch. Maybe an in joke or something. "Ignore me I'm just an amalek alt."
123_456 ago
The t-shirt idea is really good. You don't even have to do any (active) work. All we need is a design, and then upload it to a shop that does everything for you.
Zazzle.com is a good example. I actually made some money from them. They really do pay out. Also, it's not just t-shirts. Voat.co can sell mugs too, and keychains.
thesuperpapagai ago
We should set up a Voat merch store. Each subverse would have their own section where they could sell or suggest ideas for merchandise specific to their subverse. People would also have the option of sending merchandise as gifts to other Voat users. A percentage of all sales would go back to Voat.
Techius ago
I'd consider buying Voat merch if I had the chance to.
xaric ago
Go beyond t-shirts: Setup an account with a vendor who makes shirts, mugs, mousepads, pens, etc., and let subvoats create their own swag. All profit for purchased items go to Voat. (/v/Motorcycle could have a goat patch for motorcycle jackets, etc.)
Scandinavian ago
While I don't think merch can run Voat sustainably, I'd easily pay $100 for a hoodie with the Voat Goat on it with some silly text like "Free speech is a bitch" on it :) If I knew at least half that went to running the site, of course.
christ93 ago
I would pay $100 for that hoodie.
Impuredeath ago
It might be nice for when a subverse gets big enough they can submit designs. So you could have subverse specific tshirts.
thesuperpapagai ago
I can't wait for the T-Shirts v/niggers and v/SoapDoxBanHammer are going to end up making.
Impuredeath ago
Well, I am sure voat wouldn't mind very provocative shirts. However their tshirt partnership company might have an different opinion on that.
7CheeseSundae ago
"Coonburg"
Jesus wtf
ChillyHellion ago
This is a great idea. I'd love a specialized /v/gaming goat, and I think playing to people's hobbies/interests by way of subverses is a great motivator when people buy things, especially T-shirts.
fagnig ago
No offense, the goat has taken on a nostalgic feel almost, cuz voat got bigger, but its not tshirt material. It definitely needs updating/pimping.
SandorClegane ago
Bad Dragon partnership? Bad Dragon partnership.
Subtenko ago
I like the look/facial expression of the offical voat goat. someone make custom ones, i didnt like them personally.
ChillyHellion ago
I'm sure you're right, but the concept is there, and that's the hard part :)
fagnig ago
I wouldnt change it for the world, but it need remixing somehow.
Milty ago
Just out of curiosity, what was the reasoning behind no longer accepting bitcoin donations? Or is there still an address somewhere we can donate to?
go1dfish ago
It's on the about page: https://voat.co/about
Edit: https://blockchain.info/address/1BFqer7P9qqqiirbC63KqxfuZYXxk6RrBZ
QR Code
Milty ago
Ah thanks!
FriedFood100 ago
Well that's the first thing that can be done is making the bitcoin donation visible on the side or upper corner at all times. Why's is it so bloody hidden?
sinjinsmythe ago
I like cool t-shirts. Everyone likes cool t-shirts.
go1dfish ago
Thank you for the update, it's impressive that you've managed to keep this place running but it's clear that the community is really going to have to step up with donations and/or purchases if we want to keep the place afloat.
ChillyHellion ago
I think just being able to someday take credit cards is going to see a surge in donations. I donated through PayPal before they shut down Voat's account, then tried to donate through bitcoin after. Bitcoin is a great concept, but it has more hoops to jump through than traditional payment methods. I don't know if donations are a sustainable model, but I think making donations as easy as possible will see a good return for the site.
go1dfish ago
Purchasing Bitcoin requires a bunch of hoops because of all the regulations around money transmission services, but once you have it, sending Bitcoin is actually much easier and hassle free than any other currency in the world precisely because it is not controlled and regulated by governments with ulterior motives.
ChillyHellion ago
Very true, I was just stymied at the point where Coinbase was asking for a scan of a photo ID and other information I wasn't comfortable giving out. My main point is just that bitcoin (even through no fault of its own) has some hoops that people don't like jumping through even if they're interested to begin with, and that ends up cutting down on the number of people who can donate to Voat. I figure opening the door to more options will only benefit Voat, and will probably see a big upswing in donations from people who want to donate but can't/won't use bitcoin, which is probably a good percentage of potential donors.
Omegametroidhunter ago
For some reason the first thing that popped into my head was teeshirts
ChillyHellion ago
I'd wear one. Especially if I could get a specialized /v/gaming one. I think playing to people's hobbies via subverses would be a compelling way to continue selling goods. I don't think merchandising is going to sustain Voat by itself, but it might be a good holdover for a while.
go1dfish ago
I'd buy a goat shirt, I'd also be willing to pay a $5 a month subscription like I do for Liberty.me
thesuperpapagai ago
You should allow subverses to buy ad space on the front page. It produces ad revenue, increases the size of smaller subverses and it doesn't involve third parties who are going to control and influence the site.
Al_Rubyx ago
I like this idea a lot! It lets subs advertise, and makes money, and since the ads only link within voat they won't be malicious.
Driverdc5 ago
This is a great idea.
Al_Rubyx ago
Ohhh I like this idea. Don't think it'll pay for everything though.
Ripper ago
This is a titties idea!
tanukihat ago
I'd buy a rotating spot on the front page for my dumb little subverses. Voat needs money, small subverses need exposure.
frankenmine ago
Allow anyone to buy text-only ads. Make them cheap. Make them run on the same code that Voat entries do, so people can be assured of no malware, and it isn't taxing on slow computers and phones.
jackofdiamonds ago
I don't see this generating the kind of revenue we're talking about here. How much would people really pay to give exposure to a sub that isn't making them money? Maybe a few people would pay $5/month, but my guess is that this would generate maybe $100/month for Voat.
Feeds_On_Vegans ago
Sounds way too much like PTW gaming. Sub promotion should be based on merit, not funds.
lackscompassion ago
The SDBH users would save all of their tendies money to put up awful ads.
frankenmine ago
It doesn't matter. What's the worst they can put up? Colorful language? Grow up.
thesuperpapagai ago
We should probably set up limits on how much a subverse can advertise and make it more restrictive for larger subverses. For example, we would have the first few advertisements be cheaper, but the more ads you buy the more you have to pay. Larger subverses would also be expected to pay more for an ad space than smaller ones.
ChillyHellion ago
I don't really like the idea of paying for visibility; I think we'd run into the same problem that you have with Reddit Gold: it's a great way to monetize, but paying for visibility just means giving less valuable content a leg up over potentially more valuable content. I don't mind having a featured subverse on the front page, but I'd hate for that to be a "pay to play" privilege.
Al_Rubyx ago
If they're just non-intrusive ads on the top or side, they won't mess with the results of people ignoring them.
Subtenko ago
I see what ur saying, if they do figure out a way if they went this route, it should be on a time limit once a month kinda thing or something.
Donbuster ago
What about having it (featured sub) in a separate area, such as the sidebar, and a formula for cost where every day you have paid to be up, it gets more expensive at a faster rate, and resets at a slower cool down rate, so if I buy space for a day, its 100 dollars. If I buy it the next day, its 150, third day 250, but then I wait, don't rent on day 4, day 5 its 175. But then I wait 2 months, and buy another day, and its 100 again, with priority being given to smaller subs or subs that have advertised less frequently if multiple groups pay for the same day. That way it can still be cheap to advertise a sub, yet can generate a lot of income if you want to expose yourself to a full week cycle (important consideration in advertising), while making it exorbitantly pricy to manipulate the sites message by covering up all dissenting opinions
Subtenko ago
Thats an interesting concept. Never thought about that b4. It woudlnt be the first thing I concentrate on but its something to look into (whoevers field of expertise it falls into)
ChillyHellion ago
Yeah, it would have to come with a good amount of safeguards if it's possible.
pembo210 ago
I like this idea too. It's hard to get small subs exposure.
brucethemoose ago
This ^. It's a nice way to expose smaller subverses to the masses and generate a bit of revenue.
fagnig ago
Its hit and miss to advertize a new sub, and im sure some people would pay $5 to get up on some front page rotation (like atko was doing manually for a while, but automated for paying customers).
thenerd ago
I would be happy to disable my adblock for you, please don't hesitate to put up ads!
Damndirtyape ago
Ads are a slippery slope to sponsored content. What ever happened to the once a year donation till we hit our goal model? It works for wikipedia and public radio stations.
SandorClegane ago
I think the userbase might need to be slightly larger.
(Or messages advertising that need to be posted in bigger boards, one of the two.)
It's only 15k but the whole thing runs into that trouble of "someone else will surely chip in before I do and make it happen."
I think advertising your board (here, or possibly elsewhere) for a fee on the rotation is fine and dandy.
Probably best idea in the thread so far.
Also, speaking of "sponsored content..." Could always ask Ian Cheong to make some v/all posts for cash :^]
I figure sponsored content might work ok so long as everyone is on the ball and knows it's sponsored.
aka either they make and use an official corporate account (ala imgur) or longtime users pay to put some cause close to their heart up at the top for a day, with the understanding they will likely get mauled if other voaters find it disagreeable.
Dereliction ago
Ads are like SJWs -- they infect everything with their bullshit and nobody really wants them around.
No thanks. I'll give to the Bitcoin address every month if they keep one up. Additional support options is good.
thatguyiam ago
... is there a way to whitest sites with any of the adblocks?
ShinyVoater ago
The plugins for Firefox should have a whitelist option if you click the logo(at least Adblock Plus always did when I used it; I switched to Palemoon when FF when Chromey and Adblock Latitude maintains the same behavior).
thatguyiam ago
Any such options for mobile browsers?
Edit: nvm , there is Firefox for mobile as well.
HeavyBrain ago
Already doing it, so keep the ads coming, I dont even mind a video/pop up ad every 24h or so.
FringeSociety ago
Agreed. Some sidebar ads seem like an easy idea that will at least help the cause!
PM_ME_YOUR_ARCHES ago
Put Monsanto ads on every Amalek alt post, and Voat will create enough income to stay online until the dawn of the next epoch.
Also, I totally called it.
Falcon2_0 ago
That actually could happen by the end of this year.
PM_ME_YOUR_ARCHES ago
Well fuck. Amalek isn't the sustainable financial model I thought he was.
umatbro ago
Empire Earth reference?
PM_ME_YOUR_ARCHES ago
Unfortunately not.
It does sound like a good name for a terrible black metal band though.
4040545? ago
Amalek must use so many browsers and VPNs that advertising to him alone could probably keep the site afloat. I say fill his page with ads and make him sign up to win iPads every time he creates more than 50 accounts.
kurfu ago
I honestly wouldn't mind non-intrusive (non animated) sidebar ads.
AngrySOAngry ago
Yes, non clickable. Please trial some of these. Sorry I can't donate right now, or I would. Hope this site won't go POOF in a hundred days :( More and more former Redditors are turning up daily.
llagerlof ago
I don`t mind too. I even disabled uBlock for this site.
ChaseWegman ago
A small amount of tasteful advertising would more than pay for the site.
Gooust ago
I would groom this comment if grooming were a thing.
hatesniggasandfags ago
To be fair, given that voat exercises actual free speech, very few brands would be interested if any. Brands like politically correct websites.
dvdgrdll ago
I'm not sure the ads would work, not because of the community here, but because marketers are still reluctant to advertise in "Reddit", it will be even harder to convince them to advertise here. Subscription or something similar to "Gold" would be the best option
swfreak ago
I realize they need to stay afloat and I'm probably not going to be donating directly, so ads is probably their only option.
squiremarcus ago
can we make each subreddit responsable for its own ads? and they have to pay 50% to atko
Blackjack147 ago
Since they won't be intrusive, what kinds of ads should show on the front page? What companies can advertise and bring in the most money for voat?
ThisIsntMe123 ago
Ones that don't track me, but scan the post for relevant ads are fine. I already white listed Voat a while back.
sonic_sabbath ago
I know a lot of people use VPNs, but what about location/city based ads? Im sure there are a lot of small business owners on here who would pay a (smaller than normal worldwide internet ad costs) fee to have their ad shown to people in their area.
Would also mean you can have more ads using the same space based on area.
With a lower price it will mean more people can benefit and will be more community minded. As it will be more people from this community using it, I would predict there would be less pressure for content censoring etc as well.
fabulousalpaca ago
This. I don't mind adds. Go ahead.
dancemonkey ago
This. I don't have a problem with ads or even clearly marked sponsored content. I would disable adblocker for voat if this blank space over here-------------------------> had some ads which keep voat financially viable.
teatime ago
I'd voat against ads personally, but if it came down to it I would prefer a static banner to sponsored posts or something like that. My favorite radio station is ads free and this is what they do:
They've managed to stay afloat for a few years doing just that.
ShortWarrior ago
I don't like ads, but I would be willing to look at them if it meant voat would stay open.
Caboose_Calloway ago
Ads As Personal Opt-In For Every User
This means that every user can go to their settings and turn on the ads if they wish to contribute to Voat.
I believe this is the best of both worlds, it remains unobtrusive but does not take away the opportunity to contribute to the site.
Sosacms ago
Esspecially if they are sub themed. Gaming ads of /gaming, tech ads on /technology, penis enlargement ads on /preteens, etc. That's just good customer service.
Alpha_Machine ago
I don't mind ads if they're simply images and links, no tracking bullshit, non-intrusive and clearly ads.
nigganaut ago
ONLY IF THEY ARE MADE AND POSTED IN HOUSE. NO AD NETWORKS.
Ad networks is how you get malware. I will not block gif ads made by voat, but if they chine from an ad network, you bet your ass they are getting blocked. This means no flash.
0ed ago
I think the problem with ads, is that there is no guarantee that people would advertise on Voat. Voat has been slandered repeatedly as a racist, sexist website simply because it espouses free speech - and for advertisers, associating with Voat will seem like a bad idea.
What we need to do most, is to get Voat's reputation going again. We have a wonderful community here, so I'm sure it can be done if we try hard enough to submit quality content.
thesuperpapagai ago
If we do ads, we should let each subverse decide the type of adverts they want to show so people will see ads that contain products relative to their interests.
jackofdiamonds ago
Voat has been whitelisted in my Adblock since I signed up. I'm not really a bitcoin guy. This is all I can do for now.
Foralltoosee ago
The problem I have with advertisements is they come with advertisers who, once you're reliant on their funds can threaten to pull them if you don't make the changes they want to see and then we're reddit all over again. That said, I'm not sure what a viable alternative would be.
Ilikebordercollies ago
I would pay a monthly subscription to not see any ads.
Not having ads on the page is one of the things that made me switch to Voat from Reddit.
elbrum ago
I think some variant of this is the most practical solution. Unfortunately advertising is the only long term option to cover costs. Donations and Voat branded gear may provide temporary boosts but aren't viable as the primary income stream. I think it could work if ads are; bought for each subverse (probably on a rotation basis for larger subverses), don't play music or video clips and if at all possible don't track IP address.
whisky_cat ago
I'm just wondering who would pay to advertise here. I'd hope it doesn't turn into ads for every survival/prepper product out there (e.g. infowars).
And if ads happen, I'd totally pay a fee to not see them.
jerry ago
I think most wouldnt mind as long as they arent in the way. Ads like on youtube, where im trying to click the video at the top of the search list right as youtube loads their first pick, which is a fucking unrelated ad, that shit fucking kills me.
moneyshift ago
I hate ads and far too many people use adblock / ublock at this point to be of value, at least if they're still tracking impressions. I'm not sure if they do.
It would be better to do what that other site did to raise awareness of the costs -- develop a widget that shows a funding goal and progress toward that goal. Then make it easy for users to click on a button and submit a donation or setup a subscription ($5/mo, etc.). This means supporting credit cards via a real merchant account (and no, PayPal does not count...fuck PayPal and the retarded, dysfunctional horse it rode in on).
novictim ago
I agree.
Perspektiv ago
The problem with this is that most advertisers don't want their ads to be mixed with anything not considered PC. To keep the advertisers voat would need stricter moderation which leads down the path reddit took, and nobody here wants that.
That said, I have given this a lot of thought and the only solution I've found is p2p hosting, but that's a much bigger technical challenge and something which a few sites are already attempting (and seemingly failing at).
go1dfish ago
How about instead of this, just let users buy sticky posts on the homepage for any purpose with few restrictions.
ExpertShitposter ago
This. I hate ads, but i hear people also hate working for free so.....perhaps a small optional subscription that removes ads. Because without something of that sort....the site will eventually shut down.
iamanoldguy ago
I'd gladly subscribe for $5 a month to keep Voat running smoothly. Maybe a voluntary, pay what you think it's worth, from $1 to $10 a month with an option to change or cancel at anytime. Someone might fall on difficult times and have to cut back or come into a windfall and be able to afford more. Obviously no restrictions on content regardless of subscription level. I wouldn't mind non intrusive ads if it helps. Oh, and please make sure the Voat t-shirts and merchandise are available in 3XLT (yes, I'm an American but to be fair I'm 6'5")
heili ago
I would pay 20 or 30 dollars per year to subscribe ad free if they wanted to go that model.
slithica ago
This! a $1 a month subscription or something to remove ads. It would be cool.
IdSay ago
maybe even if it was for awesome stuff, like Vat19, ThinkGeek, or some artists like Jonathan coulton or Paul and Storm.
just, things that are Voat'y.
thesuperpapagai ago
If we implement this, wouldn't we need to block AdBlock? And if we do block AdBlock, won't that end up pissing some people off?
RectalLeakage ago
Just put a "Please disable adblock" in place of the ad, with some sort of story that without the ad, the site could die...
thesuperpapagai ago
And we should add a picture of a crying goat, just to be sure they get the message.
Mmatiasn ago
We shall allow one add
sonic_sabbath ago
And a shrubbery!
RectalLeakage ago
I would shit if they actually put a shrubbery...
sonic_sabbath ago
Just not in the shrubbery please!
Jefiakra ago
So...like reddit gold?
Dumb_Comment_Bot ago
That removes ads instead of just making you feel special.
LonElliott ago
This is a great idea and I would gladly pay for it. You could charge 1.00 a month to remove the ads and most would do it, which would help greatly with the costs of the site.
foshizzle ago
You're greatly overestimating how much people care.
LonElliott ago
That is a fair point, but to cover his hosting cost he would only need what, 1 percent of the userbase to actually pay a dollar a month. I think that is doable.
4043820? ago
Judging from earlier traffic statistics, it looks like if he could get 10% of users to pay $2.00 a month, that would work.
heili ago
I'm in. A yearly subscription of 24$ is well worth it.
smackdownfletch ago
I second this. I'd put a buck or two a month on autopay thru paypal to help Voat grow.
ExpertShitposter ago
Yeah. Lots of people would pay a dollar per month for something they love. How big is the pool of "regulars" that we are dealing with on Voat anyway @Atko ?
kyprioth ago
I would go with a 'pay what you want' option, cuz I'd pay more than that sometimes at least.
Sullysq ago
To keep it simple there could just be the $1 subscription and an avenue of donation always available for those willing to contribute more from time to time like yourself.
ExpertShitposter ago
Also optional 1$ per month automatic recurring payment as well as say a 10$ yearly payment option.
Omegametroidhunter ago
Ehh considering how much malware in ads in general maybe not
That said I would be down with croud funding
Cum_control ago
Crowdfunding*
Subtenko ago
He would need to use a trusted ad platform, theres other ways too tho
weezkitty ago
What if the admins handled the ad space themselves instead of using an ad server?
onegin ago
Is there danger of this if it is just an image ad? I wouldn't think that with <img src="..." /> that there would be any exploits since is just an http GET whose data gets passed to an image decoder. I am totally guessing though-- I don't know much about web security.
fagnig ago
Dead simple, host it on Voat, and its being paid for hosting wise, so no issue with the extra cost it would incur. There should be no offsite hosting for embedded pictures in css or ads. This puts user tracking in the hands of mods.
ChillyHellion ago
Most of the adware comes from ad networks, which companies use to maximize efficiency and profits. If Voat ever gets big enough to call its own shots, it could easily do ads that are vetted beforehand and not provided by an ad network. Unfortunately it's a cart before the horse kind of problem :(
fagnig ago
I know this could get annoying, but reddit allowed users to buy an advertisement in a subreddit or subreddits.
Its the kind of thing dumb users trolling their favorite or rival sub would do for $5 for a week of mandatory smack/love on the target subverse. Its not exactly gonna make a lot of money tho, no one would actually use it for advertising like they do on reddit.
ChillyHellion ago
I think you might have the heart of an idea here. You're right that it might be abused, but it would allow for advertising that is both targeted (which is valuable to advertisers) and somewhat anonymous (which is valuable to users).
fagnig ago
While /v/conspiratard could use it to say "What did the Jews do today guise, tell us over at /v/conspiratard" and annoy users of hostile subs, it could also be used as friendly banter between allied subs.
While im getting devious, flairing others. As a (cheap) purchase (for a day maybe). No this is getting...
faissaloo ago
What about adverts like what 8chan has where you pay $5 and get to put up an image only ad for I think it was the week or something
Amadameus ago
This could be a good way for communities to promote themselves as well.
Sops ago
Manhood 101 ads everywhere
Ina_Pickle ago
I could see that getting really entertaining really fast.
NoneOfTheAbove ago
Image only, no animation and no cookies? Take my voat. But I'd love to just give Atko money.
faissaloo ago
Pretty much
TH3_1D10T ago
Now imagine the MH101 guys putting up an ad on voat.
Surely there would be some regulation with this.
Adminstrater ago
Having control over the content is what makes it safe. No javascript.
faissaloo ago
That's the idea, only images (and not svgs)
BASH_SCRIPTS_FOR_YOU ago
svgs are a type of image tho
faissaloo ago
SVGs are also a great attack vector, so they should be excluded.
dv1155 ago
Exactly this. There are enough startup/sm business owners on voat to advertise. The slots could be filled with affiliate banners when there aren't any paid ads to run.
crashtestgenius ago
That'd be cool. I'd love to see that happen.
Lev-ice ago
$2 for a sub specific, $5 for site wide. Would be pretty cool, but could also end up with spam.
Fagtardicus ago
that would be really cool if i could put up a
coontownv/niggers ad sitewidefaissaloo ago
So? The spam will still pay the costs so it won't matter unless it's nsfw or something
Mr_YUP ago
I don't really feel like casually browsing when suddenly wild boobs appear. That would not be very effective.
jeegte12 ago
atko and co. are not idiotic enough to put NSFW images in SFW places.
ArchmageMordenkainen ago
You could do the same thing 8chan does: Boob ads only appear on boards marked NSFW.
E-werd ago
Hah, that would surely turn into a game.
FeelinFroggy ago
Five bucks to get a still image in the rotation for a month? Oh hell yes, I've got five bucks and a whole bunch of ideas for you ... you people to look at.
KingMortales ago
You could post a wealthy self made black guy on /v/niggers haha
Arotaes_Forgehammer ago
A game of A E S T H E T I C
ChillyHellion ago
This is the second time I've seen this referenced and I'm completely lost.
Techman ago
He's spammed this junk on Techtronix a few times, ugh.
Arotaes_Forgehammer ago
It's a Baphonet thing.
faissaloo ago
A game that will keep voat running no doubt