I can't believe this is happening. The same Deep State that KILLED JFK is being honored with the "PROFILE IN COURAGE" award to NANCY PELOSI. And the worst part is JFK's daughter thinks it's a GREAT IDEA.
"(BOSTON) — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is being honored with the 2019 JOHN F. KENNEDY Profile in Courage Award.
Pelosi is being recognized for her efforts to pass former President Barack Obama’s 2010 health care law and for helping Democrats RECLAIM CONTROL of the U.S. House during last year’s elections.
CAROLINE KENNEDY, the daughter of the late president, calls the California Democrat “the most important woman in American political history.”
Kennedy said Pelosi, who has served in the House since 1987, “leads with strength, integrity and grace under pressure.”
The award is being presented to Pelosi in a Sunday evening ceremony at the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum in Boston."
http://time.com/5591549/nancy-pelosi-jfk-profile-in-courage-award/
view the rest of the comments →
FromTelAvivWithLove ago
@lauraingalls is a known shill. Beware Patriots
Lauraingalls ago
RULES from GREATAWAKENING No posting about other users. We’ve, quite often, had people get mad at other users and make posts about them. The drama that causes is bad. Then you have people seeing it on the front page and they come here and also harass the user. That’s one thing I’m really firm about. That can get you banned. This morning a GA mod, a subject of recent harsh and obscene troll attacks on QRV, told some of the same SBBH people who had been blamed for it, to pretty much have at it in regards another GA subscriber who had been targeted as well. https://voat.co/v/SoapboxBanhammer/3227020
So the GA subscriber (who btw is likely a creation of SBBH to serve the purpose of punching bag alt) gets reported by the MOD to SBBD to be harassed. Shouldn't that be disclosed to subscribers in the rules as potential consequence? Like: 'If we decide to, the MOD will feel justified to throw your ass to SBBH members to troll and harass and at least one of them had already threatened the MODs own children. It was posted about here: https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3218522 A week later she finds it okay to report one of her own subscribers (real or not, but how do the other users know?) to that same sub? to the same accused username? @zyklon_b @srayzie link reply .
srayzie ago
I didn’t post about another user. I commented.
https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3227845/18696602
Lauraingalls ago
RULES from GREATAWAKENING No posting about other users. We’ve, quite often, had people get mad at other users and make posts about them. The drama that causes is bad. Then you have people seeing it on the front page and they come here and also harass the user. That’s one thing I’m really firm about. That can get you banned. This morning a GA mod, a subject of recent harsh and obscene troll attacks on QRV, told some of the same SBBH people who had been blamed for it, to pretty much have at it in regards another GA subscriber who had been targeted as well. https://voat.co/v/SoapboxBanhammer/3227020
So the GA subscriber (who btw is likely a creation of SBBH to serve the purpose of punching bag alt) gets reported by the MOD to SBBD to be harassed. Shouldn't that be disclosed to subscribers in the rules as potential consequence? Like: 'If we decide to, the MOD will feel justified to throw your ass to SBBH members to troll and harass and at least one of them had already threatened the MODs own children. It was posted about here: https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3218522 A week later she finds it okay to report one of her own subscribers (real or not, but how do the other users know?) to that same sub? to the same accused username? @zyklon_b @srayzie link reply .