You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

BB-3 ago

Great. My apartment is in range of like 8 or 10 WiFi networks. One more reason to get out of the city.

RoundWheel ago

Proximity is be a major factor. Signal falls off at the square of the distance.

BB-3 ago

Would it not be the cube of the distance?

qwop ago

Think of a ball around the antenna. This ball will receive all the radiation emitted, spread across its full surface.

Now what is the formula for the surface area of a sphere? It's (4 * PI * r^2).

That is, the surface of the sphere is relative to square of he radius.

This is where the inverse square law comes from - when you increase the distance, the radiation gets spread out over an increasingly big surface, and that surface grows by the square of the distance, which then gives the decrease in radiation as an inverse to the surface area, e.g. the inverse square law.

EngelbertHumperdinck ago

Brilliant explanation. The surface area model makes so much sense. Thanks!

1HepCat ago

"The poison is in the dose." With all the reflectors wrapped around a relatively small volume, the energy density might've been way more than was good for the seeds. Imagine being stuck in a tanning booth for days. That doesn't mean you can't withstand some exposure to light.

It's an interesting result but it might be even more so if they follow up, varying different energy densities and seed varieties, etc.