Media feminist agenda? Why do they lie so blatantly about something this irrelevant? (Conspiracy)

submitted ago by wootnessmonsters

Wired: "Because she is a women!"

The Verge: "Much of this rage was aimed directly at Pao, sometimes with particularly vicious racism and misogyny"

The Guardian: "Why is the world so angry with Pao? Could it be she is a women..."

New York Times: "Fighter of sexism is out of reddit!"

There are a lot more. But everyone is pretty much the same: "Oh, the reddit community are sexist misogynist etc etc...that's why they hate Pao..."

Nothing is mentioned that this whole thing started because of Victoria being fired (AFAIK A WOMEN) and EVERYONE defended her. So...what's going on?

EDIT: Archived links! Thanks @the_subhorizon for help!!

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

the_subhorizon ago

Click bait. You say it's something radical like misogyny so people who agree will share to celebrate and people who disagree will share to say it's bullshit.

You linked multiple articles about it. Congratulations, you contributed.

wootnessmonsters ago

Well I needed to provide evidence for my claims but how do I use archive and such? I have no idea how that works...

Many say click bait but I tend to think it's much deeper than that.

the_subhorizon ago

Go to archive.is, paste the link, it crunches out the archive and gives you a new url. Paste that where ever you want.

wootnessmonsters ago

Thanks! The magic is real :3